Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: H & K TOOL & DIE

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of H & K TOOL & DIE in 5217 COYE DRIVE, STEVENS POINT, WI 54481 (NAICS 332322). OSHA activity number 338404833.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch H & K Tool & DIE — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for H & K Tool & DIE is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
H & K TOOL & DIE
Site address
5217 COYE DRIVE
City
STEVENS POINT
State
WI
ZIP
54481
Mailing
5217 COYE DRIVE, STEVENS POINT, WI 54481
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
332322
Employees
15
Ownership type
A

9 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.147 C01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Mar 27, 2013
Abate by
May 1, 2013
Penalty
Initial $2,000 · Current $1,400 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(1): The employer did not establish a program consisting of an energy control procedure, employee training and periodic inspections to ensure that before any employee performed any servicing or maintenance on a machine or equipment where the unexpected energizing, startup or release of stored energy could occur and cause injury, the machine or equipment shall be isolated from the energy source and rendered inoperative:    a) On or about January 23, 2013 the employer had not developed an energy control program to ensure that potentially hazardous energy sources were de-energized before employees performed servicing and maintenance activities on equipment.     Abatement Certification and Abatement Documentation Required.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1400
  • — Z (S) $2000

1910.147 C07 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Mar 27, 2013
Abate by
May 1, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(7)(i): The employer did not provide training to ensure that the purpose and function of the energy control program are understood by employees and that the knowledge and skills required for the safe application, usage, and removal of the energy controls are acquired by employees:    a) On or about January 23, 2013 the employer had not conducted the appropriate employee training to ensure employees understood the safe application, usage, and removal of energy isolating devices when engaged in servicing and/or maintenance activities or when affected by maintenance activities.     Abatement Certification and Abatement Documentation Required.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.178 L01 I

Serious Gravity 5 3 instances 12 exposed
Issued
Mar 27, 2013
Abate by
Apr 21, 2013
Penalty
Initial $2,000 · Current $1,400 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(1)(i): The employer did not ensure that each powered industrial truck operator is competent to operate a powered industrial truck safely, as demonstrated by the successful completion of the training and evaluation specified in this paragraph (l):    a) On or about January 23, 2013 the company had not verified that each employee operating an LP forklift in the facility was a trained and competent operator as demonstrated through successful completion of training and an evaluation.     Abatement Certification and Abatement Documentation Required.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1400
  • — Z (S) $2000

1910.178 L04 III

Serious Gravity 5 3 instances 12 exposed
Issued
Mar 27, 2013
Abate by
Apr 21, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(4)(iii): An evaluation of each powered industrial truck operator's performance was not being conducted at least once every three years:    a) On or about January 23, 2013 the company had not conducted an evaluation of each forklift operator's performance at least every 3 years to ensure safe operating procedures were being followed.     Abatement Certification and Abatement Documentation Required.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.178 L06

Serious Gravity 5 3 instances 12 exposed
Issued
Mar 27, 2013
Abate by
Apr 21, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(6): The employer did not certify that each operator has been trained and evaluated as required by this paragraph (l):    On or about January 23, 2013 the employer had not certified that each forklift operator was trained and evaluated per the requirements of this standard.     Abatement Certification and Abatement Documentation Required.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.212 A03 II

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Mar 27, 2013
Penalty
Initial $1,700 · Current $1,190 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(3)(ii): Point(s) of operation of machinery were not guarded to prevent employee(s) from having any part of their body in the danger zone(s) during operating cycle(s):     a) The Cincinnati brake press Serial No. 42589 was not guarded to prevent the operator from having any part of their body in the point of operation during the hazardous downward stroke.     No Abatement Certification or Abatement Documentation Required.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1190
  • — Z (S) $1700

1910.217 C01 I

Serious Gravity 5 7 instances 1 exposed
Issued
Mar 27, 2013
Abate by
May 1, 2013
Penalty
Initial $2,000 · Current $1,400 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.217(c)(1)(i): The employer did not provide and ensure the usage of point of operation guards or properly applied point of operation devices on every operation performed on mechanical power press(es):     a) The Cleveland mechanical power press was not guarded at the back of the press to prevent employee(s) from entering the point of operation during the hazardous downward stroke.     b) The front of the Niagara 34 ton mechanical power press was not guarded to prevent the operator from entering the point of operation during the hazardous downward stroke.     c) The sliding gates on the Wean United 300 ton mechanical power press were not engaged during the hazardous downward stroke to prevent the operator(s) from entering the point of operation from the front or back of the press.     Abatement Certification and Abatement Documentation Required.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1400
  • — Z (S) $2000

1910.217 E01 I

Serious Gravity 5 7 instances 1 exposed
Issued
Mar 27, 2013
Abate by
May 1, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.217(e)(1)(i): A program of periodic and regular inspections of mechanical power press(es) was not established and followed to ensure that all parts, auxiliary equipment and safeguards were in a safe operating condition and adjustment:    a) On or about January 23, 2013 the employer had not established or implemented a preventative maintenance schedule to ensure that all parts, auxiliary equipment and safeguarding were in safe operating condition on the Niagara 34 ton mechanical power press.     b) On or about January 23, 2013 the employer had not established or implemented a preventative maintenance schedule to ensure that all parts, auxiliary equipment and safeguarding were in safe operating condition on the Cleveland mechanical power press.     c) On or about January 23, 2013 the employer had not established or implemented a preventative maintenance schedule to ensure that all parts, auxiliary equipment and safeguarding were in safe operating condition on the Wean United 300 ton mechanical power press.     d) On or about January 23, 2013 the employer had not established or implemented a preventative maintenance schedule to ensure that all parts, auxiliary equipment and safeguarding were in safe operating condition on the Bliss 90 ton mechanical power press.     e) On or about January 23, 2013 the employer had not established or implemented a preventative maintenance schedule to ensure that all parts, auxiliary equipment and safeguarding were in safe operating condition on the Vernon No. 5 mechanical power press.     f) On or about January 23, 2013 the employer had not established or implemented a preventative maintenance schedule to ensure that all parts, auxiliary equipment and safeguarding were in safe operating condition on the two Rockford mechanical power presses.     Abatement Certification and Abatement Documentation Required.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.253 B04 III

Other-than-serious 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Mar 27, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.253(b)(4)(iii): Oxygen cylinders in storage were not separated from fuel-gas cylinders or combustible materials (especially oil or grease), a minimum distance of 20 feet (6.1 m) or by a noncombustible barrier at least 5 feet (1.5 m) high having a fire-resistance rating of at least an hour:     a) On or about January 23, 2013 three cylinders of acetylene were stored next to two oxygen cylinders without a noncombustible barrier at least 5 feet high.     No Abatement Certification or Abatement Documentation Required.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

View H & K Tool & DIE's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 338404833.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.