SYRACUSE, NY —
OSHA Inspection: EAGLE JANITORIAL SERVICES
Complaint inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of EAGLE JANITORIAL SERVICES in 1419 SALT SPRINGS ROAD, SYRACUSE, NY 13214 (NAICS 561720). OSHA activity number 338408719.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- EAGLE JANITORIAL SERVICES
- Site address
- 1419 SALT SPRINGS ROAD
- City
- SYRACUSE
- State
- NY
- ZIP
- 13214
- Mailing
- P.O. BOX 282, SYRACUSE, NY 13206
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- A
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 561720
- Employees
- 41
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
7 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.132 D02
- Issued
- Feb 15, 2013
- Abate by
- Mar 23, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $3,500 · Current $2,450 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.132(d)(2): The employer did not verify, through a written certification, that the required workplace hazard assessment had been performed: a. Throughout the workplace, the employer had not performed a hazard assessment to ensure employees were provided with the proper personal protective equipment (PPE). Abatement certification must be submitted for this item.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2450
- — Z (S) $3500
1910.133 A01
- Issued
- Feb 15, 2013
- Abate by
- Mar 3, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.133(a)(1): The employer did not ensure that each affected employee uses appropriate eye or face protection when exposed to eye or face hazards from flying particles, molten metal, liquid chemicals, acids or caustic liquids, chemical gases or vapors, or potentially injurious light radiation: a. Throughout campus buildings, on or about 01/23/13: Employees using corrosive cleaning products without any type of eye and/or face protection. Abatement certification must be submitted for this item.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.151 C
- Issued
- Feb 15, 2013
- Abate by
- Mar 23, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.151(c): Where employees were exposed to injurious corrosive materials, suitable facilities for quick drenching or flushing of the eyes and body were not provided within the work area for immediate emergency use: a. Wthin Mitchell Halland Foery Hall, on or about 01/23/13: Employees using corrosive cleaning products where no facilities were provided for flushing the eyes in an emergency situation. Abatement certification must be submitted for this item.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.1200 E01
- Issued
- Feb 15, 2013
- Abate by
- Mar 23, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $2,100 · Current $1,470 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met: a. At the worksite, on or about 01/23/13: The employer had not developed w written hazard communication program which addressed the requirements as listed in the standard. Abatement certification must be submitted for this item.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1470
- — Z (S) $2100
1910.1200 E01 I
- Issued
- Feb 15, 2013
- Abate by
- Mar 23, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1)(i): The written hazard communication program did not include a list of the hazardous chemicals known to be present, using an identity that was referenced on the appropriate material safety data sheet: a. At the worksite, on or about 01/23/13: The employer had not developed a chemical iinventory list as required by the hazard communication standard. Abatement certification must be submitted for this item.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.1200 F05
- Issued
- Feb 15, 2013
- Abate by
- Mar 3, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $2,100 · Current $1,470 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(f)(5): The employer did not ensure that each container of hazardous chemicals in the workplace was labeled, tagged, or marked with the identity and appropriate hazard warnings regarding the chemicals contained therein. a. In Mitchell Hall, on or about 01/23/13: A spray bottle was not labled as to what chemical was in the bottle. Abatement certification must be submitted for this item.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1470
- — Z (S) $2100
1910.1200 H01
- Issued
- Feb 15, 2013
- Abate by
- Mar 23, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $1,960 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area: a. Throughout the facilities, on or about 01/23/13: Non-english speaking employees were not provided with effective information and training on the hazards associated with their use of hazardous chemicals such as but not limited to Acidulate. Abatement certification must be submitted for this item.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1960
- — Z (S) $2800
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 561720)
More inspections in NY
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 338408719.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.