Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,198,892Inspections Most recent open 2026-09-03 Last loaded 2026-09-07

OSHA Inspection: LEE TILLMAN

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of LEE TILLMAN in BEACH BLVD. WEST OF BUENA VISTA, PASCAGOULA, MS 39567 (NAICS 236115). OSHA activity number 338430432.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch LEE Tillman for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for LEE Tillman is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
LEE TILLMAN
Site address
BEACH BLVD. WEST OF BUENA VISTA
City
PASCAGOULA
State
MS
ZIP
39567
Mailing
10700 JIM BUSBY RD., THEODORE, AL 36582
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
Non-union (B)
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
236115
Employees
4
Ownership type
Private (A)

3 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.501 B13

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Feb 11, 2013
Abate by
Mar 1, 2013
Penalty
Initial $1,360 · Current $544 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13):     Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b):     (a)  Rear Porch - On or about January 22, 2013 employees were exposed to fall hazards while using a ladder at the edge of a porch 13 feet above the ground and they were not protected by guardrails, safety nets or personal fall arrest systems.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $544
  • · Z (S) $1360

1926.701 B

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Feb 11, 2013
Abate by
Mar 1, 2013
Penalty
Initial $1,360 · Current $544 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.701(b):     All protruding reinforcing steel, onto and/or into which employees could fall or come against, was not guarded to eliminate the hazard of impalement:    (a)   Rear of Residence - On or about January 22, 2013 employees were exposed to impalement hazards while working near reinforcing steel projecting 10 inches above formwork and the employees were not protected by caps over the reinforcing steel.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $544
  • · Z (S) $1360

1926.1053 B04

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Feb 11, 2013
Abate by
Mar 1, 2013
Penalty
Initial $2,040 · Current $1,768 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(4):     Ladders were used for purposes other than the purposes for which they were designed:    (a)   Rear Porch - On or about January 22, 2013 an employee was exposed to fall hazards while using a step ladder in a manner similar to a non self-supported ladder.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1768
  • · Z (S) $2040

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 338430432.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.