Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: REESE ENTERPRISES, INC.

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of REESE ENTERPRISES, INC. in 14101 INDUSTRIAL PARK BLVD., NE, COVINGTON, GA 30014 (NAICS 326199). OSHA activity number 338446032.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Reese Enterprises, INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Reese Enterprises, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
14101 INDUSTRIAL PARK BLVD., NE
City
COVINGTON
State
GA
ZIP
30014
Mailing
P.O. BOX 2299, COVINGTON, GA 30015
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
326199
Employees
34
Ownership type
A

7 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.147 C04 II A

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Mar 27, 2013
Abate by
Apr 22, 2013
Penalty
Initial $2,975 · Current $1,785 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(4)(ii)(A): The energy control procedure did not have a specific statement of the intended use of the procedure:    On or about January 24, 2013, employees were exposed to struck-by hazards when the lockout procedures for the extruders, pullers, cut/punch machines, and cutting machine did not describe when the procedures were to be used.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1785
  • — Z (S) $2975

1910.147 C04 II C

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Mar 27, 2013
Abate by
Apr 22, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(4)(ii)(C): The energy control procedure did not clearly and specifically outline the steps for placement, removal and transfer of lockout devices or tagout devices and the responsibility for them:    On or about January 24, 2013, employees were exposed to struck-by hazards when the lockout procedures for the extruders, pullers, punch/cut machines, and cutting machines did not include statements describing the steps to be used to remove the lockout devices.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.147 C06 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Mar 27, 2013
Abate by
Apr 22, 2013
Penalty
Initial $2,975 · Current $1,785 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(6)(i): The employer shall conduct a periodic inspection of the energy control procedure at least annually to ensure that the procedure and the requirements of this standard are being followed.    On or about January 24, 2013, employees were exposed to struck-by hazards when the employer did not periodically audit the lockout procedures to insure that they were being followed and did not need modifications.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1785
  • — Z (S) $2975

1910.212 A01

Serious Gravity 5 5 instances 10 exposed
Issued
Mar 27, 2013
Abate by
Apr 22, 2013
Penalty
Initial $2,975 · Current $1,785 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1): One or more methods of machine guarding was not provided to protect the operator and other employees in the machine area from hazards such as those created by point of operation, ingoing nip points, rotating parts, flying chips and sparks:    On or about January 24, 2013, employees are exposed to struck-by hazards when the in-going nip points on the pullers and punch/cut machines were not completely guarded.     a. Large pullers with tractor feed: cardboard guards did not completely cover the tractor feed and were easily moved or damaged; tractor feed could also be accessed under the side guards which were mesh or plywood.   b. Small pullers with belt feed:  paper clip guards were not installed to completely cover the openings and did not prevent access to the bottom of the belt feed; belt feed could also be accessed under the mesh guard.   c. Punch/cut machines: paper clip guards on belt puller were not installed to completely cover the openings.   d. Cutting machine: index feed with no guard to limit access to nip point.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1785
  • — Z (S) $2975

1910.305 B01 II

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 10 exposed
Issued
Mar 27, 2013
Abate by
Apr 22, 2013
Penalty
Initial $2,975 · Current $1,785 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.305(b)(1)(ii): Unused openings in boxes, cabinets, or fittings were not effectively closed:    On or about January 24, 2013, employees were exposed to electrical hazards when a hole on the side of the #9 grinders electrical control box permitted access to the wiring inside.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1785
  • — Z (S) $2975

1910.178 Q07

Other-than-serious 1 instance 10 exposed
Issued
Mar 27, 2013
Abate by
Apr 22, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.178(q)(7): Powered industrial truck(s) which were used on a round-the-clock basis were not examined for defects after each shift:    On or about January 24, 2013, employees were exposed to struck-by hazards when the forklifts were not inspected on a daily basis on each shift.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.1030 F02 I

Other-than-serious 1 instance 9 exposed
Issued
Mar 27, 2013
Abate by
Apr 22, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1030(f)(2)(i): Hepatitis B vaccination was not made available after the employee had received the training required in 29 CFR 1910.1030(g)(2)(vii)(I) or within 10 working days of initial assignment to employees who had occupational exposure:     On or about January 24, 2013, employees were exposed to bloodborne pathogens when the employer had not offered hepatitis B vaccinations to the members of the first responder team.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

View Reese Enterprises, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 338446032.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.