DARIEN, WI —
OSHA Inspection: BIRDS EYE FOODS LLC
Planned inspection · Health discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned health inspection of BIRDS EYE FOODS LLC in W8880 COUNTY ROAD X, DARIEN, WI 53114 (NAICS 311411). OSHA activity number 338486434.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- BIRDS EYE FOODS LLC
- Site address
- W8880 COUNTY ROAD X
- City
- DARIEN
- State
- WI
- ZIP
- 53114
- Mailing
- W8880 COUNTY RD X, DARIEN, WI 53114
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Health
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- A
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 311411
- Employees
- 700
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
8 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.23 C01
- Issued
- Jun 13, 2013
- Abate by
- Dec 13, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $5,000 · Current $5,000
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.23(c)(1): Open-sided floors and/or platforms four feet or more above adjacent floor or ground level were not guarded with standard railings (or equivalent) and toeboards: Note:Toeboards are only required when persons can pass, there is moving equipment or there is equipment with which falling materials could create a hazard. On or about January 18, 2013, the rooftop and three rooftop elevations of 4 feet or more were not guarded with standard railings (or equivalent) and toeboards.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $5000
- — C (S) $5000
- — Z (S) $5000
1910.24 B
- Issued
- Jun 13, 2013
- Abate by
- Dec 31, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $7,000 · Current $7,000
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.24(b): Fixed stairs were not provided were access to elevations was daily or at each shift for such purposes as gauging, inspection, regular maintenance, etc., where such work may expose employee(s) to acids, caustics, gases, or other harmful substances, or for which purposes the carrying of tools or equipment by hand is normally required: On or about January 18, 2013, the employer did not provide fixed industrial stairs for employee access to the rooftops and different rooftop elevations for inspection and gauging of the refrigeration system equipment each shift, which may expose employees to anhydrous ammonia.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $7000
- — C (S) $7000
- — Z (S) $7000
1910.132 A
- Issued
- Jun 13, 2013
- Abate by
- Jul 2, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $5,000 · Current $5,000
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.132(a): Protective equipment, including personal protective equipment for eyes, face, head, and extremities, protective clothing, respiratory devices, and protective shields and barriers was not provided, used, and/or maintained. On or about January 18, 2013, protective equipment for head and extremities was not provided and used properly in that personal fall arrest equipment for employees accessing the evaporative condenser for Engine Room 3 was not provided with anchorages that were not being used to support or suspend platforms, and were capable of supporting at least 5, 000 pounds per employee.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $5000
- — C (S) $5000
- — Z (S) $5000
1910.132 F02
- Issued
- Jun 13, 2013
- Abate by
- Jul 2, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $5,000 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.132(f)(1): The employer did not provide training to each employee who is required by this section to use personal protective equipment. On or about January 18, 2013, the employer did not provide training for employees using fall protection equipment, including but not limited to, training on proper anchorage points, inspection of equipment, and prompt rescue procedures.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $0
- — C (S) $5000
- — Z (S) $5000
1910.119 E03 I
- Issued
- Jun 13, 2013
- Abate by
- Jul 2, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $5,000 · Current $5,000
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.119(e)(3)(i): The process hazard analysis did not address the hazards of the process. On or about January 18, 2013, the previous process hazard analysis for the anhydrous ammonia refrigeration system and its various components did not address the hazards of the process, including but not limited to, the following: a) The Process Hazard Analysis for Engine Rooms 1, 2, 4 and 4b did not address the hazard of an anhydrous ammonia release in the engine rooms that involves employee contact with anhydrous ammonia and the need to utilize an emergency eye wash station and deluge body shower located external to the engine rooms due to ammonia concentrations and hazards within the engine room. b) The Process Hazard Analysis for Engine Rooms 1, 2, 4 and 4b did not address the hazard of an anhydrous ammonia release in the engine rooms and notification to employees prior to entering the engine rooms. c) The Process Hazard Analysis for Engine Room 2 did not address the hazard of an anhydrous ammonia release in the engine room and the need to employees to rapidly exit through an exit door that did not open outward. d) The Process Hazard Analysis for Engine Rooms 1, 2, 4 and 4b did not address the hazard of an anhydrous ammonia release in the engine rooms and the need for emergency remote controls for the emergency mechanical ventilation system immediately outside the designated principle exterior engine room doors. e) The Process Hazard Analysis for the anhydrous ammonia refrigeration system did not address the hazard of exposure to and contact with anhydrous ammonia at all ammonia handling points, such as but not limited to, the roof top evaporative condensers for Engine Rooms 1, 2, 4 and 4b.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $5000
- — C (S) $5000
- — Z (S) $5000
1910.119 E03 V
- Issued
- Jun 13, 2013
- Abate by
- Jul 2, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.119(e)(3)(v): The process hazard analysis did not address facility siting. On or about January 18, 2013, the employer did not conduct a process hazard analysis that addressed facility siting for the location and venting of safety relief valves for the anhydrous ammonia refrigeration system in relation to employee occupancy.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $0
- — C (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.119 D03 II
- Issued
- Jun 13, 2013
- Abate by
- Jul 2, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $5,000 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(ii): The employer did not document that equipment complies with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices. a) Engine Rooms 1, and 4 did not have an emergency eye wash station and deluge body shower located external to the engine rooms and readily accessible, per ANSI/IIAR 2 - 2008 "Equipment, Design, and Installation of Closed-Circuit Ammonia Mechanical Refrigeration Systems" - Section 13.1.6.1. b) Engine Rooms 1, 4 and 4b did not have an audible and visual alarm inside each refrigerating machine room and outside each entrance to the refrigerating machine room, per ANSI/IIAR 2 - 2008 "Equipment, Design, and Installation of Closed-Circuit Ammonia Mechanical Refrigeration Systems" - Section 13.2.1.2. c) On the rooftop, the discharge location from multiple pressure safety valves to the atmosphere were not 15 feet or greater from the adjacent grade or roof level, and were not arranged to avoid spraying refrigerant on persons in the vicinity, ANSI/IIAR 2 - 2008 "Equipment, Design, and Installation of Closed-Circuit Ammonia Mechanical Refrigeration Systems" Section 11.3.6.4. d) Irrigation facilities, and/or eye wash bottles were not available at all ammonia handling points, such as but not limited to, the roof top evaporative condensers for Engine Rooms 1, 2, 4 and 4b , IIAR Bulletin - 2008 "Equipment, Design, and Installation of Closed-Circuit Ammonia Mechanical Refrigeration Systems" Section 13.1.11.1.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $0
- — C (S) $5000
- — Z (S) $5000
1910.119 J04 II
- Issued
- Jun 13, 2013
- Abate by
- Jul 2, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $5,000 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.119(j)(4)(ii): The inspection and testing procedures did not follow recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices. On or about January 18, 2013, the inspection and testing procedures for the safety cutouts of the screw compressors did not follow RAGAGEP.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $0
- — C (S) $5000
- — Z (S) $5000
More inspections at Birds EYE Foods LLC
View Birds EYE Foods LLC's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 311411)
More inspections in WI
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 338486434.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.