FAIRPORT, NY — 2013-01-25 00:00:00

OSHA Inspection: PARKER HANNIFIN

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

At a glance

On 2013-01-25 00:00:00, OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of PARKER HANNIFIN in 83 ESTATES DRIVE WEST, FAIRPORT, NY 14450 (NAICS 326199). OSHA activity number 338501638.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Parker Hannifin — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Parker Hannifin is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.

Where did this inspection happen?

Establishment: PARKER HANNIFIN
Site address: 83 ESTATES DRIVE WEST
City: FAIRPORT
State: NY
ZIP: 14450
Mailing: 16 FLAGSTONE DRIVE, HUDSON, NH 03051

What kind of inspection was it?

Inspection type: Planned (H)
Scope: Complete (A)
Discipline: Safety
Advance notice: No
Union status: B

When did the case open and close?

Opened: 2013-01-25 00:00:00
Closing conference: 2013-01-31 00:00:00
Case closed: 2013-07-05 00:00:00
Last modified: 2026-07-21 00:00:00
Data loaded: 2026-07-22 00:19:52

Establishment context

NAICS code: 326199
Employees: 122
Ownership type: A

Citations

5 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.23 C01

Serious Gravity 10 3 instances 13 exposed

Issued: Feb 14, 2013
Abate by: May 1, 2013
Penalty: Initial $7,000 · Current $5,000 Reduced

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.23(c)(1):     Open-sided floors and/or platforms four feet or more above adjacent floor or ground level were not guarded with standard railings (or equivalent) and toeboards: Note:  Toeboards are only required when persons can pass, there is moving equipment or there is equipment with which falling materials could create a hazard.    a) On or about 1/31/13 in the Processing area: work platform on injection mold machine #19, at a height of 71.5 inches, used to access the hopper and the robot, did not have any fall protection system exposing employees to fall hazards.      b) On or about 1/31/13 in the Processing area; work platform on injection mold machine # 46, at a height of 74.75 inches, used to access the hopper and robot, did not have any fall protection system exposing employees to fall hazards.     c) On or about 1/31/13 in the Processing area; work platform on injection mold machine # 41, at a height of 72.75 inches, used to access the hopper and robot, did not have any fall protection system exposing employees to fall hazards.     d) On or about 1/31/13 in the Processing area; work platform on injection mold machine # 40, at a height of 73 inches, used to access the hopper and robot, did not have any fall protection system exposing employees to fall hazards.     Abatement Documentation Required

Recent events (3)

2013-06-03 00:00:00 — J (S) $5000
2013-03-08 00:00:00 — C (S) $7000
2013-02-14 00:00:00 — Z (S) $7000

1910.23 E01

Serious Gravity 1 9 instances 13 exposed

Issued: Feb 14, 2013
Abate by: May 1, 2013
Penalty: Initial $3,000 · Current $2,000 Reduced

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.23(e)(1): Standard railing(s) did not consist of top rail, intermediate rail and/or posts and/or did not have a vertical height of 42 inches (106.7 cm) nominal from upper surface of top rail to floor, platform runway, or ramp level: a) On or about 1/31/13 throughout the injection mold area; the work platform for injection mold machine #15 was at a height of 82 inches from grade. The guard rail system had a top rail of 35 inches and no mid rail. b) On or about 1/31/13 throughout the injection mold area; the work platform for injection mold machine #42 was at a height of 80.5 inches from grade. The guard rail system had no mid rail. c) On or about 1/31/13 throughout the injection mold area; the work platform for injection mold machine #7 was at a height of 93 inches from grade. The guard rail system had a top rail of 36 inches with a mid rail. d) On or about 1/31/13 throughout the injection mold area; the work platform for injection mold machine #49 was at a height of 80.5 inches from grade. The guard rail system had no mid rail. e) On or about 1/31/13 throughout the injection mold area; the work platform for injection mold machine #48 was at a height of 84 inches from grade. The guard rail system had no mid rail. f) On or about 1/31/13 throughout the injection mold area; the work platform for injection mold machine #52 was at a height of 92 inches from grade. The guard rail system had a top rail of 36 inches and with no mid rail. g) On or about 1/31/13 throughout the injection mold area; the work platform for injection mold machine #50 was at a height of 116 inches from grade. The guard rail system had a top rail of 36.5 inches and with no mid rail. h) On or about 1/31/13 throughout the injection mold area; the work platform for injection mold machine #34 was at a height of 90 inches from grade. The guard rail system had a top rail of 37 inches and with a mid rail. i) On or about 1/31/13 throughout the injection mold area; the work platform for injection mold machine #51 was at a height of 91 inches from grade. The guard rail system had a top rail of 36.5 inches and no mid rail. Abatement Certification Required

Recent events (3)

2013-06-03 00:00:00 — J (S) $2000
2013-03-08 00:00:00 — C (S) $3000
2013-02-14 00:00:00 — Z (S) $3000

1910.147 C04 I

Other-than-serious 2 instances 15 exposed

Issued: Feb 14, 2013
Abate by: Mar 17, 2013
Penalty: Initial $5,000 · Current $0 Reduced

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.147(c)(4)(i):     Procedures were not developed, documented and utilized for the control of potentially hazardous energy when employees were engaged in activities covered by this section:    a) On or about 01/31/13 throughout the injection mold area; employees are involved in changing the molds on injection mold machines with tonnage less than 500, such as but not limited to, #7,#13,#15, #25,#41,#42,#48,#49, without the use of the applicable Webster Plastic Lockout Tagout Procedure ( form B-116-1602 ).      b) On or about 1/31/13 throughout the injection mold area; employees are involved in service and maintenance activities, such as but not limited to, removing, cleaning and reinstalling slides on injection mold machine #15 during production, removing short shots and plastic stuck on injection mold machine#41 during production, tie-in adjustments on various mold machines, without the use of the applicable Webster Plastic Lockout Tagout Procedure ( form B-116-1602 ).      Abatement Certification Required

Recent events (3)

2013-06-03 00:00:00 — J (O) $0
2013-03-08 00:00:00 — C (S) $5000
2013-02-14 00:00:00 — Z (S) $5000

1910.147 C04 II D

Other-than-serious 1 instance 15 exposed

Issued: Feb 14, 2013
Abate by: Mar 17, 2013
Penalty: Initial $3,000 · Current $0 Reduced

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.147(c)(4)(ii)(D):     The energy control procedures did not clearly and specifically outline the requirements for testing a machine or equipment to determine and verify the effectiveness of lockout devices, tagout devices, and other energy control:  a) On or about 1/31/13 throughout the facility; Webster Plastics Lockout/Tagout Procedures ( Form B-116-1602 ), such as but not limited to Procedure number LOTO-32, 43, 44,36,13, 61, did not include a step which required the authorized employee to test the operation of the machine or equipment to verify proper control of hazardous energy.     Abatement Certification Required

Recent events (3)

2013-06-03 00:00:00 — J (O) $0
2013-03-08 00:00:00 — C (S) $3000
2013-02-14 00:00:00 — Z (S) $3000

1910.305 B01 I

Other-than-serious 1 instance 2 exposed

Issued: Feb 14, 2013
Abate by: Mar 17, 2013
Penalty: Initial $0 · Current $0

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.305(b)(1)(i):     Conductors entering cutout boxes, cabinets, or fittings were not protected from abrasions:  a) On or about 1/26/13 in the Premier area; the conduit on the heated extruder head was not secured exposing live conductors (220 volts AC).       Abatement Certification Required

Recent events (3)

2013-06-03 00:00:00 — J (O) $0
2013-03-08 00:00:00 — C (O) $0
2013-02-14 00:00:00 — Z (O) $0

More inspections at Parker Hannifin

Mar 8, 2023 KEARNEY, NE Feb 23, 2018 ALLIANCE, NE Jul 2, 2015 GOSHEN, IN Sep 24, 2012 DAVENPORT, IA Aug 7, 2008 IRVINE, CA

View Parker Hannifin's full OSHA safety record →

More inspections in this industry (NAICS 326199)

Jul 16, 2026 Rehrig Pacific Company · LAWRENCEVILLE, GA Jul 14, 2026 Caplugs, LLC · ERIE, PA Jul 13, 2026 G & W Precision · WHATELY, MA Jul 13, 2026 Western Fiberglass INC. · SANTA ROSA, CA Jul 13, 2026 Continental Structural Plastics · CONNEAUT, OH

More inspections in NY

Jul 17, 2026 Sullivan County Care Center at Sunset Lake · LIBERTY, NY Jul 17, 2026 Vergara Electrical LLC · NEW YORK, NY Jul 17, 2026 Apple Converting, INC. · ONEONTA, NY Jul 17, 2026 Namicela Home Solutions INC · SYRACUSE, NY Jul 17, 2026 Cranesville Block CO., INC. · SYRACUSE, NY

Source

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 338501638.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.