Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
2,004,209Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-13 Last loaded 2026-07-17

OSHA Inspection: TAIYO, INC.

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of TAIYO, INC. in 2660-A WAIWAI LOOP, HONOLULU, HI 96819 (NAICS 424490). OSHA activity number 338519234.

Watch Taiyo, INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Taiyo, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
TAIYO, INC.
Site address
2660-A WAIWAI LOOP
City
HONOLULU
State
HI
ZIP
96819
Mailing
P.O. BOX 31087, HONOLULU, HI 96820
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
424490
Employees
13
Ownership type
A

8 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.37 A03

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 11 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $1600.00 · Current $1200.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.37(a)(3): Exit route(s) were not kept free and unobstructed:    a) Warehouse, exit door: The employer exposed employees to entrapment and burn hazards due to a fire exit that was obstructed by a parked vehicle.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1200
  • — Z (S) $1600

1910.178 L04 III

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 8 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $1200.00 · Current $900.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(4)(iii): An evaluation of each powered industrial truck operator's performance was not being conducted at least once every three years:    a) Throughout the warehouse: Employees operating powered industrial trucks had not received refresher training at least once every three years, exposing employees to struck-by hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $900
  • — Z (S) $1200

1910.178 Q07

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 8 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $1600.00 · Current $1200.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.178(q)(7): Industrial trucks were being placed in services after the examination showed condition(s) adversely affecting the safety of the vehicle:    a) Warehouse area: The employer exposed employees to struck-by hazards as a forklift that was in operation had an inoperable horn.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1200
  • — Z (S) $1600

1910.305 B01 II

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $1600.00 · Current $1200.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.305(b)(1)(ii): Unused openings in boxes, cabinets, or fittings were not effectively closed:    a) Warehouse area, near roll-up doors:  The employer exposed employees to electrical shock hazards of 220 volts as an electrical panel had a blank opening that was missing a fitting.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1200
  • — Z (S) $1600

1910.1200 E01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 11 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $1600.00 · Current $1200.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met:    a) Written hazard communication program: The employer exposed employees to chemical hazards due to the company not developing or implementing a written Hazardous Communication Program prior to using chemicals, such as but not limited to, propane, degreasers, wd-40, and other cleaners.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1200
  • — Z (S) $1600

1910.110 F02 II

Other-than-serious 1 instance 8 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.110(f)(2)(ii): LP gas container(s) stored inside were located near or in area(s) normally used or intended for the safe exit of employees:    a) Warehouse, near roll-up doors: The employer stored a full propane gas cylinder near the roll-up doors that is used for employees to exit and load or unload products, exposing employees to potential fire, explosion, struck-by, and tripping hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.132 D02

Other-than-serious 1 instance 11 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.132(d)(2): The employer did not verify, through a written certification, that the required workplace hazard assessment had been performed:    a) Written documentation: The employer did not have a written certification that a personal protective equipment assessment had been conducted.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.157 C01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.157(c)(1): Portable fire extinguishers were not mounted, located and identified so that they were readily accessible without subjecting the employees to injuries:    a) Packaging department, entrance: The employer exposed employees to burn and tripping hazards caused by numerous fire extinguishers that were placed on the floor in unmarked locations.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 338519234.