Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: LION OIL COMPANY, INC.

Follow-up inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a follow-up safety inspection of LION OIL COMPANY, INC. in 1000 MCHENRY, EL DORADO, AR 71731 (NAICS 324110). OSHA activity number 338542830.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Lion OIL Company, INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Lion OIL Company, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
1000 MCHENRY
City
EL DORADO
State
AR
ZIP
71731
Mailing
1000 MCHENRY, EL DORADO, AR 71731
Inspection type
Follow-up (F)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
A
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
324110
Employees
250
Ownership type
A

3 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.119 D03 II

Other-than-serious 1 instance 12 exposed
Issued
Mar 12, 2013
Abate by
Mar 27, 2013
Penalty
Initial $7,000 · Current $3,500 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(ii): The employer did not document that equipment complies with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices.    The employer does not ensure it documented that equipment in the process complied with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices.    The violation occurred in Crude Unit 7 on or about February 1, 2013 and at times prior thereto, the employer failed to adequately document that the calculated inlet pressure drop did not pose a safety ristk resulting from potential PSV chattering on identified relief valves including, but not limited to, PSV 107,109, 110, AND 191.       Pursuant to 29 C.F.R. 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date the employer must submit documentation showing it is in compliance with the standard, including describing the steps it is taking to ensure it documents that equipment in the process complies with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $3500
  • — Z (S) $7000

1910.119 D03 II

Deleted Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 12 exposed
Issued
Mar 12, 2013
Abate by
Mar 27, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(ii): The employer did not document that equipment complies with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices.    The employer does not ensure it documented that equipment in the process complied with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices.    The violation occurred on or about January 29, 2013 and at times prior thereto, in Crude Unit 7 the employer failed to ensure intervening block valve(s) to/from relief devices were open during operation in accordance with ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code, Division 1, Section VIII.  Identified relief devices include but are not limited to 07PSV-114 and 07PSV-127 .  This condition exposed employees to fire and explosion hazards.    Pursuant to 29 C.F.R. 1903.19, within (10) calendar days of the abatement date the employer must submit documentation showing it is in compliance with the standard, including describing the steps it is taking to ensure it documented that equipment in the process complied with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.119 F01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 12 exposed
Issued
Mar 12, 2013
Abate by
May 2, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.119(f)(1): The employer did not develop and implement written operating procedures that provide clear instructions for safely conducting activities involved in each covered process.     The employer does not ensure written operating procedures are implemented that provided clear instructions for safely conducting activities involved in each process.     The violation occurred on or about January 28, 2013 and at times prior thereto, in Crude Unit 7 where the employer failed to ensure written operating procedures were implemented that provided clear instructions for safely conducting activities involved in each process for the administrative control for the use of chains, locks, or car-seals to ensure the intervening block to/from relief devices were open during operation. Identified vessels are 007-100 and 007-101.  This condition exposed employees to inhalation, fire, and explosion hazards.      Pursuant to 29 C.F.R. 1903.19, within (10) calendar days of the abatement date the employer must submit documentation showing it is in compliance with the standard, including describing the steps it is taking to ensure written operating procedures were implemented that provided clear instructions for safely conducting activities involved in each process for the administrative control for the use of chains, locks, or car-seals to ensure the intervening block to/from relief devices were open during operation.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

View Lion OIL Company, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 338542830.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.