Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: A&G DEVELOPMENT LLC

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of A&G DEVELOPMENT LLC in 5940 MAIN STREET, TRUMBULL, CT 06611 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 338548035.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch A&G Development LLC — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for A&G Development LLC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
A&G DEVELOPMENT LLC
Site address
5940 MAIN STREET
City
TRUMBULL
State
CT
ZIP
06611
Mailing
15 CANTERBURY LANE, TRUMBULL, CT 06611
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238160
Employees
8
Ownership type
A

8 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.100 A

Serious Gravity 5 4 instances 4 exposed
Issued
Feb 7, 2013
Abate by
Feb 15, 2013
Penalty
Initial $2,000 · Current $1,200 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.100(a):     Employees working in areas where there was a possible danger of head injury from impact, or falling or flying objects, or from electrical shock and burns, were not protected by protective helmets:    Worksite:  Employees who were working on the ground in areas where material was being lifted and carried above them were not provided with and required to wear hard hats.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1200
  • — Z (S) $2000

1926.102 A01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Feb 7, 2013
Abate by
Feb 15, 2013
Penalty
Initial $2,000 · Current $1,200 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1):     Eye and face protective equipment were not used when machines or operations presented potential eye or face injury from physical, chemical, or radiation agents.    Worksite:  Employees who were using saws and pneumatic nail guns were not provided with and required to wear safety glasses.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1200
  • — Z (S) $2000

1926.451 F07

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Feb 7, 2013
Abate by
Feb 20, 2013
Penalty
Initial $2,000 · Current $1,200 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.451(f)(7):     Scaffolds were not erected, moved, dismantled, or altered, by trained and experienced employees under the supervision and direction of a competent person qualified in scaffold erection, moving, dismantling or alteration:; Such activities were not performed only by experienced and trained employees selected for such work by the competent person.    Worksite:  The employer did not ensure that the ladder jack scaffold had been erected under the supervision of a competent person.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1200
  • — Z (S) $2000

1926.451 G01 I

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Feb 7, 2013
Abate by
Feb 15, 2013
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $2,000 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.451(g)(1)(i):     Each employee on a boatswains' chair, catenary scaffold, float scaffold, needle beam scaffold, or ladder jack scaffold was not protected by a personal fall arrest system:    Worksite:  Employees who were working from a ladder jack scaffold while exposed to fall hazards of approximately 18 feet, were not provided with fall protection.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2000
  • — Z (S) $2800

1926.501 B11

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Feb 7, 2013
Abate by
Feb 15, 2013
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $2,000 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(11):     Each employee on a steep roof with unprotected sides and edges 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels was not protected from falling by guardrail systems with toeboards, safety net systems, or personal fall arrest systems:    Worksite:  Employees, who were performing roofing work on a steep pitch roof, approximately 20 feet above the ground, were not provided with and required to wear fall protection.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2000
  • — Z (S) $2800

1926.503 A01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 8 exposed
Issued
Feb 7, 2013
Abate by
Apr 8, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1):     The employer did not provide a training program for each employee potentially exposed to fall hazards to enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards:    Worksite:  The employer did not ensure that all employees who were performing roofing work were trained in the hazards associated with falling and the proper ways, methods and procedures to take in order to minimize these hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.1053 B01

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 8 exposed
Issued
Feb 7, 2013
Abate by
Feb 15, 2013
Penalty
Initial $1,600 · Current $700 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1):     Where portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface and the ladders length allows, the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface being accessed:    Worksite:  Employees were accessing the lower and upper levels of the roof using two separate extension ladders that did not extend at least three feet above the upper landing surface of the roof.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $700
  • — Z (S) $1600

1926.1053 B06

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Feb 7, 2013
Abate by
Feb 15, 2013
Penalty
Initial $2,000 · Current $1,200 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(6):     Ladders were used on surfaces which were not stable and level:    Worksite:  The employer did not ensure that the two extension ladders, which were used to support the ladder jack scaffold, had been set on a stable surface to prevent movement or displacement.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1200
  • — Z (S) $2000

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 338548035.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.