DECATUR, GA —
OSHA Inspection: LEGACY OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY L.L.C.
Complaint inspection · Health discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of LEGACY OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY L.L.C. in 4166 SNAPFINGER WOODS DRIVE, DECATUR, GA 30035 (NAICS 621111). OSHA activity number 338590433.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- LEGACY OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY L.L.C.
- Site address
- 4166 SNAPFINGER WOODS DRIVE
- City
- DECATUR
- State
- GA
- ZIP
- 30035
- Mailing
- 4166 SNAPFINGER WOODS DRIVE, DECATUR, GA 30035
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Complete (A)
- Discipline
- Health
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 621111
- Employees
- 7
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
8 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.151 C
- Issued
- Apr 22, 2013
- Abate by
- Jun 27, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $2,000 · Current $1,000 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.151(c): Where employees were exposed to injurious corrosive materials, suitable facilities for quick drenching or flushing of the eyes and body were not provided within the work area for immediate emergency use: On or about January 31, 2013: Employees working in the specimen room were exposed to eye contact hazards associated with Haemo-Sol, a corrosive material while sterilizing equipment. The employer failed to ensure an eyewash station was available to employees.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1000
- — Z (S) $2000
1910.1030 C01 I
- Issued
- Apr 22, 2013
- Abate by
- Jun 27, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $1,600 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1030(c)(1)(i): Each employer having an employee(s) with occupational exposure as defined by paragraph (b) of this section did not establish a written Exposure Control Plan designed to eliminate or minimize employee exposure. On or about January 31, 2013: Employees working in the procedure rooms were exposed to blood and other potentially infectious material while performing various medical procedures. The employer failed to develop an Exposure Control Plan to protect employees performing these tasks.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1600
- — Z (S) $2800
1910.1200 E01
- Issued
- Apr 22, 2013
- Abate by
- Jun 27, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $1,400 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met: On or about January 31, 2013: Employees working in the specimen room were exposed to inhalation and skin/eye contact hazards associated with chemicals such as but not limited to formaldehyde, bleach, Haemo-Sol, and other disinfectants while processing specimens and sterilizing equipment. The employer failed to ensure a hazard communication program was developed to protect employees from chemical hazards.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1400
- — Z (S) $2800
1910.1200 G01
- Issued
- Apr 22, 2013
- Abate by
- Jun 27, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(g)(1): The employer did not have a material safety data sheet for each hazardous chemical in use: On or about January 31, 2013: Employees working in the specimen room were exposed to inhalation and skin/eye contact hazards associated with chemicals such as but not limited to formaldehyde, bleach, Haemo-Sol, and other disinfectants while processing specimens and sterilizing equipment. The employer failed to ensure a material safety data sheet for each chemical was available to employees.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.1200 H01
- Issued
- Apr 22, 2013
- Abate by
- Jun 7, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area: On or about January 31, 2013: Employees working in the specimen room were exposed to inhalation and skin/eye contact hazards associated with chemicals such as but not limited to formaldehyde, bleach, Haemo-Sol, and other disinfectants while processing specimens and sterilizing equipment. The employer failed to ensure employees were provided information and training on the chemicals they were exposed to.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.134 C
- Issued
- Apr 22, 2013
- Abate by
- Jun 7, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(c): The employer did not develop and implement a written respiratory protection program with required worksite-specific procedures and elements for required respirator use: On or about January 31, 2013: Employees working in the specimen room were required to wear 3M 1860 respirator while performing specimen processing duties. The employer failed to ensure a respiratory protection program was developed to protect employees from potential hazards.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (O) $0
1910.134 D01 I
- Issued
- Apr 22, 2013
- Abate by
- Jun 7, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(d)(1)(i): Selection of appropriate respirators was not based on the respiratory hazard(s) to which the worker was exposed and user factors that affect respirator performance and reliability: On or about January 31, 2013: Employees working in the specimen room were required to wear 3M 1860 Particulate respirator while performing specimen processing duties involving chemicals such as formaldehyde. The employer failed to ensure the respiratory protection required was appropriate for the hazards the employees were exposed to.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (O) $0
1910.157 E03
- Issued
- Apr 22, 2013
- Abate by
- Jun 7, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.157(e)(3): Portable fire extinguishers were not subjected to an annual maintenance check: On or about January 31, 2013: Employees performing duties in the doctor's office were exposed to fire hazards as the fire extinguishers in the facility had not been inspected annually as required.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (O) $0
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 621111)
More inspections in GA
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 338590433.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.