LINCOLN, IL —
OSHA Inspection: FEDEX FREIGHT, INC.
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of FEDEX FREIGHT, INC. in 151 OLSON DRIVE, LINCOLN, IL 62656 (NAICS 484122). OSHA activity number 338596836.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- FEDEX FREIGHT, INC.
- Site address
- 151 OLSON DRIVE
- City
- LINCOLN
- State
- IL
- ZIP
- 62656
- Mailing
- 151 OLSON DRIVE, LINCOLN, IL 62656
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Complete (A)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 484122
- Employees
- 83
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
7 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.36 G02
- Issued
- Mar 25, 2013
- Abate by
- May 15, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $3,000 · Current $1,000 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.36(g)(2): An exit access must be at least 28 inches (71.1 cm) wide at all points. Where there is only one exit access leading to an exit or exit discharge, the width of the exit and exit discharge must be at least equal to the width of the exit access. Near the electrical room, the path measured approximately 8 inches and the exit access was not maintained at least 28 inches at all times.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $1000
- — Z (S) $3000
1910.303 B01 I
- Issued
- Mar 25, 2013
- Abate by
- May 15, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $4,000 · Current $1,000 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.303(b)(1)(i): Electrical equipment was not free from recognized hazards likely to cause death or serious physical harm, in that the employer did not ensure that the electrical equipment had listing or labeling identifying the purpose for which it was designed by the manufacturer or approved for use by a nationally recognized lab: Employees were exposed to electrical hazards when operating forklifts and staging pallet jacks near dock station 1 because the electrical metallic tubing (conduit) was damaged; the conduit contained a break and was not fastened in place every ten feet.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $1000
- — Z (S) $4000
1910.305 B01
- Issued
- Mar 25, 2013
- Abate by
- Apr 4, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $4,000 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.305(b)(1) Unused openings in boxes, cabinets, or fittings were not effectively closed: Employees were exposed to electrical shock when accessing the panel box because the panels door had an unused opening.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $4000
1910.1200 F05 I
- Issued
- Mar 25, 2013
- Abate by
- Apr 4, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
1910.1200(f)(5)(i) The employer did not ensure that each container of hazardous chemicals in the workplace was labeled, tagged or marked with the identity of the hazardous chemical(s) contained therein: Employees were exposed to the hazards associated with an unknown substance in a container because the container was not labeled, tagged, or marked with the chemical in the container.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (O) $0
1910.1200 F05 II
- Issued
- Mar 25, 2013
- Abate by
- Apr 4, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
1910.1200(f)(5)(ii): The employer did not ensure that each container of hazardous chemicals in the workplace was labeled, tagged or marked with the appropriate hazard warnings: Employees were exposed to the hazards associated with an unknown substance in a container because the container was not labeled to convey general information regarding the products hazards.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (O) $0
1910.1200 G01
- Issued
- Mar 25, 2013
- Abate by
- Apr 4, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(g)(1) The employer did not have a material safety data sheet for each hazardous chemical which they used: Employees were exposed to hazardous chemicals including propane, windshield deicer, and hydraulic jack oil. The employer did not have a material safety data sheet (MSDS) for each of these hazardous chemicals.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (O) $0
1910.1200 H03 II
- Issued
- Mar 25, 2013
- Abate by
- Apr 4, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(3)(ii): Employees were not provided training on the physical and health hazards of the chemicals in the work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard was introduced into their work area: Employees were exposed to hazardous chemicals including propane, windshield deicer, and hydraulic jack oil and were not provided training on the physical and health hazards of the chemicals in the work area.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (O) $0
More inspections at Fedex Freight, INC.
View Fedex Freight, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 484122)
More inspections in IL
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 338596836.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.