Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: PV ENGINEERING & MANUFACTURING, INC.

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of PV ENGINEERING & MANUFACTURING, INC. in 88 RABBIT ROAD, SALISBURY, MA 01952 (NAICS 332710). OSHA activity number 338603640.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch PV Engineering & Manufacturing, INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for PV Engineering & Manufacturing, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
88 RABBIT ROAD
City
SALISBURY
State
MA
ZIP
01952
Mailing
88 RABBIT ROAD, SALISBURY, MA 01952
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
332710
Employees
27
Ownership type
A

11 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.36 D01

Serious Gravity 5 3 instances 27 exposed
Issued
Mar 21, 2013
Penalty
Initial $2,529 · Current $1,700 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.36(d)(1):     Employee(s) were not able to open an exit route door from the inside at all times without keys, tools, or special knowledge:    Location:  Machine Shop    On or about 1/31/13, employees were exposed to fire and entrapment hazards due to locked exit doors in the machine shop.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1700
  • — Z (S) $2529

1910.132 D01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 27 exposed
Issued
Mar 21, 2013
Abate by
May 7, 2013
Penalty
Initial $4,900 · Current $2,100 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.132(d)(1):     The employer did not assess the workplace to determine if hazards are present, or are likely to be present, which necessitate the use of personal protective equipment:    Location: Facility    On or about 2/5/13, the employer did not assess the workplace of hazards for workers that remove chips from a CNC machine conveyor without adequate gloves.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2100
  • — Z (S) $4900

1910.132 D02

Deleted Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Mar 21, 2013
Abate by
May 7, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.132(d)(2):     The employer did not verify, through a written certification, the identity of the workplace evaluated, the person certifying that the evaluation had been performed, and the date the hazard assessment was done:    Location: Facility    On or about 2/5/13, the employer did not certify the workplace of hazards through a written hazard assessment for the workers that remove metal chips from CNC conveyors, cut wood and steel with the vertical and horizontal band saws, and utilize cutting torches.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.147 C01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 27 exposed
Issued
Mar 21, 2013
Abate by
May 7, 2013
Penalty
Initial $4,900 · Current $3,400 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(1):     The employer did not establish a program consisting of an energy control procedure, employee training and periodic inspections to ensure that before any employee performed any servicing or maintenance on a machine or equipment where the unexpected energing, startup or release of stored energy could occur and cause injury, the machine or equipment shall be isolated from the energy source and rendered inoperative:     Location: Facility    On or about 2/5/13, the employer did not perform training and/or utilize energy control procedures to protect employees from the unexpected start up and amputation hazards while performing set up and servicing to the CNC machines, milling machines, and the turn center machines.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $3400
  • — Z (S) $4900

1910.178 L04 III

Deleted Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 27 exposed
Issued
Mar 21, 2013
Penalty
Initial $2,529 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(4)(iii):     An evaluation of each powered industrial truck operator's performance was not being conducted at least once every three years:    Location:  Location    On or about 2/5/13, the employer did not re-evaluate the powered industrial truck operators' performance every three years.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $2529

1910.212 A01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Mar 21, 2013
Abate by
May 7, 2013
Penalty
Initial $2,975 · Current $2,800 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1):     One or more methods of machine guarding was not provided to protect the operator and other employees in the machine area from hazards such as those created by point of operation, ingoing nip points, rotating parts, flying chips and sparks:    Location: Turning center room    1. On or about 1/31/13, the employer did not guard the un-used portion of the rotating blade on the Hyd-Mech, model #H-14a horizontal band saw to protect employees from laceration and amputation hazards.    On or about 1/31/13, the employer did not ensure that a guard was in place to enclose the internal moving components of the CNC milling machines while in operation, exposing the operators to point of operation and amputation hazards for the following but not limited to machines;    2. Hardinge, model #CS-42  3. Mori Seiki, model #SL-3
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2800
  • — Z (S) $2975

1910.212 A03 II

Serious Gravity 10 10 instances 24 exposed
Issued
Mar 21, 2013
Abate by
May 7, 2013
Penalty
Initial $4,900 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(3)(ii):     Point(s) of operation of machinery were not guarded to prevent employee(s) from having any part of their body in the danger zone(s) during operating cycle(s):    Location: Facility    On or about 2/5/13, machine operators opened the by-passed and/or damaged interlocking door guard while the spindle was spinning to observe the alignment of the parts to the spindle, exposing the operators to point of operation and amputation hazards.  The employer by-passed the interlocking door guarding device on the following but not limited to CNC machines;    Location: Lathe Department  1. Nakamura-Tome, Methods Slant Jr., serial #14905  2. Tongta (Topper), Type #TNL-100A  3. Hardinge, model #CS-42  4. Mori Seiki, model #SL-3    Location: Milling Department  5. Matsura, model #MC-800VF	  6. Excel, model #PMC-5V-720  7. Matsura, model #510VS  8. Matsura, model #MC-600VF  9. Excel, model #810  10. Amera-Seiki, model #MC-2660
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $4900

1910.213 I01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Mar 21, 2013
Penalty
Initial $2,529 · Current $2,500 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.213(i)(1):     Non-working portion(s) of the blade of bandsaw(s) were not enclosed or guarded:    Location: Turning center room    On or about 1/31/13, the employer did not provide an adequate adjustable blade guard on the Spartan, model #526V vertical bandsaw, exposing workers to laceration hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2500
  • — Z (S) $2529

1910.219 D01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Mar 21, 2013
Penalty
Initial $2,529 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.219(d)(1):     Pulley(s) with part(s) seven feet or less from the floor or work platform were not guarded in accordance with the requirements specified in 29 CFR 1910.219(m) and (o):    Location: Lathe Department    On or about 1/31/13, the employer did not adequately guard the belt and pulley of the Bridgeport drill press, serial #J33501 to protect employees from in-going nip-points.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $2529

1910.303 B02

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 1 exposed
Issued
Mar 21, 2013
Penalty
Initial $2,529 · Current $2,500 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.303(b)(2):     Listed or labeled electrical equipment was not used or installed in accordance with instructions included in the listing or labeling:    Location: Milling Department    On or about 1/31/13, the employer did not ensure the electrical breaker cabinet covers were secured to the cabinets, exposing employees to arc flash/blast, electric shock, and fire hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2500
  • — Z (S) $2529

1910.305 B01 II

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Mar 21, 2013
Penalty
Initial $2,529 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.305(b)(1)(ii):     Unused openings in boxes, cabinets, or fittings were not effectively closed:    Location: Milling Department    On or about 1/31/13, two knockouts were missing on the 240-volt electrical cabinet and was missing a blank inside of the cabinet exposing employees that work in the room to electrical shock and fire hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $2529

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 338603640.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.