SANTA RITA, GU —
OSHA Inspection: GUAM INDUSTRIAL SERVICES, INC.
Planned inspection · Health discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned health inspection of GUAM INDUSTRIAL SERVICES, INC. in BUILDING 20 NAVAL BASE GUAM, SANTA RITA, GU 96915 (NAICS 336611). OSHA activity number 338640832.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- GUAM INDUSTRIAL SERVICES, INC.
- Site address
- BUILDING 20 NAVAL BASE GUAM
- City
- SANTA RITA
- State
- GU
- ZIP
- 96915
- Mailing
- P.O. BOX 13010 NAVAL ACTIVITES, SANTA RITA, GU 96915
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Health
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 336611
- Employees
- 380
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
17 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.134 C01
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $4000.00 · Current $2000.00 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1): A written respiratory protection program that included the provisions in 29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1)(i) - (ix) with worksite specific procedures was not established and implemented for required respirator use: Guam Shipyard: On February 1, 2013, and at times prior thereto, the employer did not have a written respiratory protection program for employees who were required to wear a variety of respiratory protection. This provision is applicable to shipyard employment by 29 CFR 1915.154.
Recent events (3)
- — C (S) $4000
- — F (S) $2000
- — Z (S) $4000
1910.134 G01 I B
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $4000.00 · Current $2000.00 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(g)(1)(i)(B): Respirators with tight-fitting facepieces were worn by employees with a condition that interfered with the face-to-facepiece seal or valve function Guam Shipyard: On February 1, 2013, and at times prior thereto, employers did not ensure employees who were exposed to metal fumes were wearing their respiratory protection properly in the following locations; A. Fabrication Shop: Employees who were exposed to manganese, iron oxide fume, and cadmium were wearing bandanas under their respirators. B. Big Blue Dry Dock: Employees who were exposed to copper fumes, manganese, zinc oxide, and iron oxide fume were wearing bandanas or balaclavas under their respirators. This provision is applicable to shipyard employment by 29 CFR 1915.154.
Recent events (3)
- — C (S) $4000
- — F (S) $2000
- — Z (S) $4000
1910.1027 D01 I
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $3000.00 · Current $1500.00 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1027(d)(1)(i): The employer did not determine whether any employee was exposed to cadmium at or above the action level: Guam Shipyard, Fabrication Shop: On February 1, 2013, and at times prior thereto, the employer had not conducted air monitoring to determine employees who were involved in welding, grinding, torch or plasma cutting were exposed to cadmium. On February 1, 2013, an employee welding on metal from the ballast tank for a total of 345 minutes (sample S1-LL was taken for 180 minutes and S2-LL was taken for 165 minutes) was exposed to an eight hour time weighted average of 0.0006 milligrams per cubic meter of cadmium. The PEL is 0.005 milligrams per cubic meter and zero exposure was assumed for the remaining 135 minutes (in which the employee was not in this area preforming this job task). This provision is applicable to shipyard employment by 29 CFR 1915.1027.
Recent events (3)
- — C (S) $3000
- — F (S) $1500
- — Z (S) $3000
1910.1027 M01 III
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $4000.00 · Current $2000.00 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1027(m)(1)(iii): Employers did not include cadmium in the hazard communication program established to comply with the HCS ( 1910.1200): Guam Shipyard: On February 1, 2013, and at times prior thereto, the employer did not include cadmium in the Hazard Communication Program. The employer did not have a written Hazard Communication Program. This provision is applicable to shipyard employment by 29 CFR 1915.1027.
Recent events (3)
- — C (S) $4000
- — F (S) $2000
- — Z (S) $4000
1910.1200 E01
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met: Guam Shipyard: On February 1, 2013, and at times prior thereto, the employer did not develop, implement, or maintain a written Hazard Communication Program for employees who were exposed to hazardous materials including but not limited to; flammable gases, paints, metal fumes such as cadmium, and sandblasting media. This provision is applicable to shipyard employment by 29 CFR 1915.1200.
Recent events (3)
- — C (S) $0
- — F (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1915.56 E
- Issued
- Penalty
- Initial $3400.00 · Current $1700.00 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1915.56(e): Arc welding and cutting operations were not shielded by noncombustible or flameproof screens to protect employees in the vicinity from the direct rays of the arc: Guam Shipyard, Fabrication Shop Cylinder Storage: On January 31, 2013, an employee was welding in an open area where other employees were working without the protection of a welding screen.
Recent events (3)
- — C (S) $3400
- — F (S) $1700
- — Z (S) $3400
1915.81 A01
- Issued
- Penalty
- Initial $5100.00 · Current $2550.00 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1915.81(a)(1): The employer did not maintain good housekeeping practices to eliminate hazards to employees: Guam Shipyard, Big Blue Dry Dock: On February 1, 2013, and at times prior thereto, the employer failed to maintain good housekeeping aboard the dry dock.
Recent events (3)
- — C (S) $5100
- — F (S) $2550
- — Z (S) $5100
1915.81 B01 IV
- Issued
- Penalty
- Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1915.81(b)(1)(iv): The employer did not place each hose and cord above the walkway in a location that would prevent injury to employees and damage to the hoses and cords: Guam Shipyard, Big Blue Dry Dock: On February 1, 2013, and at times prior thereto, the employer failed to ensure cords and hoses were kept out of locations such as walkways to prevent injury to employees.
Recent events (3)
- — C (S) $0
- — F (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1915.82 B02
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $4000.00 · Current $2000.00 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1915.82(b)(2): Lights with bulbs that are not completely recessed are equipped with guards to prevent accidental contact with the bulb; Guam Shipyard, Big Blue Dry Dock: On February 1, 2013, and at times prior thereto, several portable temporary light strings were missing a guard for the bulb or missing bulb itself aboard the dry dock.
Recent events (3)
- — C (S) $4000
- — F (S) $2000
- — Z (S) $4000
1915.505 F02 I
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $6000.00 · Current $3000.00 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1915.505(f)(2)(i): The fire response equipment was not kept in a state of readiness: Guam Shipyard: On Feburary 1, 2013, and at times prior thereto, the employer did not ensure that portable fire extinguishers were kept in a state of readiness; A. Big Blue Dry Dock, Fabrication Shop, Safety Office: Portable fire extinguishers were not subjected to an annual maintenance check. B. Fabrication Shop: A portable fire extinguisher was not mounted where it was advertised. C. Fabrication Shop and Safety Office: Portable fire extinguishers had not been hydrostatically tested within the allotted time frame.
Recent events (3)
- — C (S) $6000
- — F (S) $3000
- — Z (S) $6000
1915.507 B01
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1915.507(b)(1): The portable fire extinguishers and hose systems were not selected, installed, inspected, maintained, and tested by the employer according to NFPA 10-2002 Standard for Portable Fire Extinguishers: Guam Shipyard: On Feburary 1, 2013, and at times prior thereto, the employer did not ensure that portable fire extinguishers were kept in a state of readiness; A. Big Blue Dry Dock, Fabrication Shop, Safety Office: Portable fire extinguishers were not subjected to an annual maintenance check. B. Fabrication Shop: A portable fire extinguisher was not mounted where it was advertised. C. Fabrication Shop and Safety Office: Portable fire extinguishers had not been hydrostatically tested within the allotted time frame.
Recent events (3)
- — C (S) $0
- — F (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1915.508 E01 IV
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $4000.00 · Current $2000.00 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1915.508(e)(1)(iv): The fire watch employee was not trained annually: Guam Shipyard, Big Blue Dry Dock and Fabrication Shop: On February 1, 2013, and at times prior thereto, employees responsible for the fire watch where welding and grinding operations were occurring had not been trained in fire extinguisher use upon hire or annually.
Recent events (3)
- — C (S) $4000
- — F (S) $2000
- — Z (S) $4000
1910.253 B04 I
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $20000.00 · Current $10000.00 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.253(b)(4)(i): Oxygen cylinders were stored near highly combustible material, especially oil and grease; or near reserve stocks of carbide and acetylene or other fuel-gas cylinders, or near other substance likely to cause or accelerate fire: Guam Shipyard, Fabrication Shop Cylinder Storage: On February 1, 2013, and at times prior thereto, oxygen and acetylene cylinders were stored next to one another. Guam Industrial Services, Inc. was previously cited for a violation of this occupational safety and health standard 1910.253(b)(4)(i), which was contained in OSHA inspection number 315278036, citation number 01, item number 006 and was affirmed as a final order on 08/19/2011, with respect to a workplace located at Building 20, Naval Base Guam, Santa Rita, Guam.
Recent events (3)
- — C (R) $20000
- — F (R) $10000
- — Z (R) $20000
1915.153 A01
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $20000.00 · Current $10000.00 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1915.153(a)(1): The employer did not ensure that employees used appropriate eye or face protection where there were exposures to eye or face hazards caused by flying particles, molten metal, liquid chemicals, acid, caustic liquids, gases, vapors, or potentially injurious light radiation: Guam Shipyard, Big Blue Dry Dock and Fabrication Shop: On February 1, 2013, and at times prior thereto, the employer did not ensure all employees who were exposed to flying particles, sparks, and potentially injurious light radiation were provided with eye protection, specifically, safety glasses. Guam Industrial Services, Inc. was previously cited for a violation of this occupational safety and health standard 1915.153(a)(1), which was contained in OSHA inspection number 315175372, citation number 01, item number 003 and was affirmed as a final order on 05/31/2011, with respect to a workplace located at Building 20, Naval Base Guam, Santa Rita, Guam.
Recent events (3)
- — C (R) $20000
- — F (R) $10000
- — Z (R) $20000
1904.29 A
- Issued
- Penalty
- Initial $1000.00 · Current $500.00 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1904.29(a): The employer did not use an OSHA 300, 301 and 300A Form or equivalent: Guam Shipyard: On January 31, 2013, and at times prior thereto, the employer forms used for recording injuries and illnesses were not an equivalent form for the calendar year 2012.
Recent events (3)
- — C (O) $1000
- — F (O) $500
- — Z (O) $1000
1915.55 A01
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1915.55(a)(1): Valve protection caps on gas Welding and cutting cylinders were not in place or secure: Guam Shipyard, Big Blue Dry Dock: On February 1, 2013, and at times prior thereto, the employer failed to ensure compressed oxygen and acetylene gas cylinders were properly capped.
Recent events (3)
- — C (O) $0
- — F (O) $0
- — Z (O) $0
1915.152 B04
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1915.152(b)(4): The employer failed to document an occupational hazard assessment which should have included; Occupations involved in the survey, the date in which the survey took place and the name of the person who performed the hazard assessment: Guam Shipyard, Big Blue Dry Dock: Guam Shipyard: On February 1, 2013, and at times prior thereto, the employer had failed to document and verify a personal protective equipment hazard assessment and occupational hazard assesment when employees were performing specific job tasks inlcuding, but not limited to, welding, grinding, plasma cutting, shift fitting, sand blasting and elelctrical work.
Recent events (3)
- — C (O) $0
- — F (O) $0
- — Z (O) $0
More inspections at GUAM INDUSTRIAL SERVICES, INC.
PITI, GU—2022-11-26 00:00:00
GUAM INDUSTRIAL SERVICES, INC.
SANTA RITA, GU—2022-07-21 00:00:00
GUAM INDUSTRIAL SERVICES, INC.
SANTA RITA, GU—2022-07-21 00:00:00
GUAM INDUSTRIAL SERVICES, INC.
SANTA RITA, GU—2022-01-27 00:00:00
GUAM INDUSTRIAL SERVICES, INC.
SANTA RITA, GU—2022-01-27 00:00:00
GUAM INDUSTRIAL SERVICES, INC.
View GUAM INDUSTRIAL SERVICES, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 336611)
NORTH CHARLESTON, SC—2026-07-14
DETYENS SHIPYARDS, INC.
KINGSFORD, MI—2026-07-14
LAKE SHORE SYSTEMS, INC DBA TRIDENT MARITIME SYSTEMS
AMELIA, LA—2026-07-10
CONRAD SHIPYARD, LLC
PORTSMOUTH, VA—2026-07-09
PALFINGER MARINE USA INC.
STUART, FL—2026-07-07
APPLIED CONCEPTS UNLEASHED, INC.
More inspections in GU
BARRIGADA, GU—2026-01-22
DURI CORPORATION
TAMUNING, GU—2026-01-21
DLR CORPORATION
BARRIGADA, GU—2026-01-21
DURI CORPORATION
TAMUNING, GU—2026-01-20
MG CONSTRUCTION COMPANY
BARRIGADA, GU—2026-01-20
PFM -VERTEX-LMS
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 338640832.