Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: HAWK WELDING & FABRICATION COMPANY

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of HAWK WELDING & FABRICATION COMPANY in 2829 BRYAN AVE., FORT WORTH, TX 76104 (NAICS 332312). OSHA activity number 338644040.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Hawk Welding & Fabrication Company — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Hawk Welding & Fabrication Company is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
2829 BRYAN AVE.
City
FORT WORTH
State
TX
ZIP
76104
Mailing
2829 BRYAN AVE. #101-A, FORT WORTH, TX 76104
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
332312
Employees
13
Ownership type
A

9 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.23 D01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Mar 18, 2013
Abate by
Apr 11, 2013
Penalty
Initial $2,000 · Current $1,200 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.23(d)(1): Flights of stairs having four or more risers were not equipped with a standard railing as specified in paragraphs (d)(1)(i) through (v) of this section:      a) On or about January 31, 2013, the stairs leading to the Polishing Department was equipped with standard handrails but were not equipped with a midrail, exposing employees to the hazard of falling.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1200
  • — Z (S) $2000

1910.157 C01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Mar 18, 2013
Abate by
Apr 11, 2013
Penalty
Initial $1,600 · Current $960 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.157(c)(1): Portable fire extinguishers were not mounted, located and identified so that they were readily accessible without subjecting the employees to injuries:      (a) On or about January 31, 2013, the Amerexr fire extinguisher was not identified, exposing employees to the hazard of fire.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $960
  • — Z (S) $1600

1910.157 C04

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Mar 18, 2013
Abate by
Apr 11, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.157(c)(4): Portable fire extinguishers were not maintained in a fully charged and operable condition:      (a) On or about January 31, 2013, the Amerexr fire extinguisher was not fully charged and operable, exposing employees to the hazard of fire.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.178 L01 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Mar 18, 2013
Abate by
Apr 11, 2013
Penalty
Initial $2,400 · Current $1,440 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(1)(i): The employer did not ensure that each powered industrial truck operator was competent to operate a powered industrial truck safely, as demonstrated by the successful completion of the training and evaluation specified in this paragraph (l)      29 CFR 1910.178(l)(1)(i): The employer shall ensure that each powered industrial truck operator is competent to operate a powered industrial truck safely, as demonstrated by the successful completion of the training and evaluation specified in this paragraph (l).      a) On or about January 31, 2013, in the shipping department, the employees driving the Toyota 5000 pound forklift, serial number 000470L, were not trained, exposing employees to the hazard of being struck by the lift.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1440
  • — Z (S) $2400

1910.212 A01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Mar 18, 2013
Abate by
Apr 11, 2013
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $1,680 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1): Machine guarding was not provided to protect operators and other employees from hazard(s) created by ingoing nip points and rotating parts:       a)On or about January 31, 2013, in the welding department,  employer did not provide a guard over the Summit 12" chuck lathe,  exposing employees to the hazard of being struck by the jaws of the chuck.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1680
  • — Z (S) $2800

1910.215 A04

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Mar 18, 2013
Abate by
Apr 11, 2013
Penalty
Initial $1,600 · Current $960 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.215(a)(4): Grinding machinery was not used with work rest(s) to support offhand grinding work:        a)On or about January 31, 2013, in the welding department, no work rests were provided on the Baldor Bench Grinder, exposing employees to the hazard of being struck by the wheel.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $960
  • — Z (S) $1600

1910.215 B09

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Mar 18, 2013
Abate by
Apr 11, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.215(b)(9): The distance between the abrasive wheel periphery(s) and the adjustable tongue or the end of the safety guard peripheral member at the top exceeded one fourth inch:      a)On or about jamuary 31, 2013, in the welding department, the left tongue guard was not adjusted properly on the Baldor 1/2 HR Bench Grinder, exposing employees to the hazard of being struck by the wheel.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.305 B01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Mar 18, 2013
Abate by
Apr 11, 2013
Penalty
Initial $1,200 · Current $720 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.305(b)(1): Openings through which conductors enter boxes, cabinets, or fittings were not effectively closed:      (a)  On or about January 31, 2013, in the welding department, the emloyer did not ensure the electrical junction box with exposed wires had a cover plate, exposing employees to the hazard of electrical shock.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $720
  • — Z (S) $1200

1910.1200 E01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Mar 18, 2013
Abate by
Apr 11, 2013
Penalty
Initial $1,200 · Current $720 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met:      a) On or about january 31, 2013, there was no hazard communication program developed or maintained, when employees are using chemicals such as,  but not limited to, Sparkleen 307 cleaning oill, exposing employees to the hazard of skin irritations.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $720
  • — Z (S) $1200

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 338644040.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.