Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: B C DEVELOPMENT, LLC

Complaint inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of B C DEVELOPMENT, LLC in 8160 W. OVERLAND ROAD, BOISE, ID 83709 (NAICS 811192). OSHA activity number 338653637.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch B C Development, LLC — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for B C Development, LLC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
8160 W. OVERLAND ROAD
City
BOISE
State
ID
ZIP
83709
Mailing
835 E. FAIRVIEW, MERIDIAN, ID 83642
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
811192
Employees
12
Ownership type
A

10 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.132 A

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Jun 3, 2013
Abate by
Jun 27, 2013
Penalty
Initial $1,750 · Current $1,400 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.132(a): Employer did not provide personal protective equipment to be used when necessary whenever hazards capable of causing injury or impairment were encountered.   a) Wash Tunnel and Detail Shop: on or about February 1, 2013, and at times prior thereto, employees' hands were exposed to hydrofluoric acid while mixing and applying Wheel Brite while wearing torn nitrile gloves.   b) Wash Tunnel and Detail Shop: on or about February 1, 2013, and at times prior thereto, employees were exposed to chemical burn hazards while mixing and applying Wheel Brite without wearing chemical resistant aprons.  NOTE: Abatement certification IS required for this item.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1400
  • — Z (S) $1750

1910.133 A01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jun 3, 2013
Abate by
Jun 27, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.133(a)(1): The employer did not ensure that each affected employee uses appropriate eye protection when exposed to eye hazards from  acids or caustic liquids:    a) Wash Tunnel and Detail Shop: on or about February 1, 2013, and at times prior thereto, employees used Wheel Brite chrome and aluminum cleaner without chemical splash goggles.      NOTE: Abatement certification IS required for this item.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.151 C

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jun 3, 2013
Abate by
Jun 27, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.151(c): Where employees were exposed to injurious corrosive materials, suitable facilities for quick drenching or flushing of the eyes and body were not provided within the work area for immediate emergency use:  a) Detail Shop and Wash Tunnel: on February 1, 2013, and at times prior thereto, employees were not provided with a means of quick drenching of the eyes or flushing of the eyes and body.   NOTE: Abatement certification IS required for this item.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.1200 E01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jun 3, 2013
Abate by
Jun 27, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met:   (a) Wash Tunnel and Detail Shop: on February 1, 2013, and at times prior thereto, a hazard communication program was not in place to ensure that knowledge of the hazards of the chemicals, including but not limited to Wheel Brite, was transmitted to employees.   NOTE: Abatement certification IS required for this item.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 C01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jun 3, 2013
Abate by
Jun 27, 2013
Penalty
Initial $1,050 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1): A written respiratory protection program that included the provisions in 29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1)(i) - (ix) with worksite specific procedures was not established and implemented for required respirator use:     (a) Wash Tunnel: on February 1, 2013, and at times prior thereto, the employer did not develop and implement a written respirator program prior to requiring the use of respirators by employees exposed to corrosive cleaning compounds.     NOTE:  Abatement certification IS required for this item.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $1050

1910.134 D01 III

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jun 3, 2013
Abate by
Jun 27, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(d)(1)(iii): The employer did not identify and evaluate the respiratory hazards in the workplace:      a)Wash Tunnel: on February 1, 2013, and at times prior thereto, the employer required the use of respirators before evaluating worksite hazards.      NOTE: Abatement certification IS required for this item.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 E01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jun 3, 2013
Abate by
Jun 27, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace:     (a) Wash Tunnel: on February 1, 2013, and at times prior thereto, the employer did not provide a medical evaluation of employees prior to requiring them to use of respirators.    NOTE: Abatement certification IS required for this item.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 F02

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jun 3, 2013
Abate by
Jun 27, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(f)(2): Employee(s) using tight-fitting facepiece respirators were not fit tested prior to initial use of the respirator:     a) Wash Tunnel: on February 1, 2013, and at times prior thereto, the employer did not fit test employees prior to requiring them to use respirators.     NOTE: Abatement certification IS required for this item.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 H01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jun 3, 2013
Abate by
Jun 27, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(h)(1):  Respirators were not cleaned, disinfected, stored, inspected and repaired for employee's use:     a) Wash Tunnel : on or about February 1, 2013, and at times prior thereto, the employer provided employees with respirators that were: left out in the open, exposed to continual soaking in the wash tunnel, supporting incorrect cartridges and had broken head straps.     NOTE: Abatement certification IS required for this item.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 K

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jun 3, 2013
Abate by
Jun 27, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(k): The employer did not provide comprehensive, understandable training annually and/or more often if necessary.    a) Wash Tunnel : on or about February 1, 2013, and at times prior thereto, the employer did not provide training to employees required to wear a respirator.    NOTE: Abatement certification IS required for this item.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 338653637.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.