GRAND ISLAND, NE —
OSHA Inspection: METTENBRINK ELECTRIC CORP
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of METTENBRINK ELECTRIC CORP in 3445 STOLLEY PARK ROAD, GRAND ISLAND, NE 68802 (NAICS 238210). OSHA activity number 338658230.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- METTENBRINK ELECTRIC CORP
- Site address
- 3445 STOLLEY PARK ROAD
- City
- GRAND ISLAND
- State
- NE
- ZIP
- 68802
- Mailing
- PO BOX 548, GRAND ISLAND, NE 68802
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238210
- Employees
- 6
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
4 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.132 D02
- Issued
- Apr 18, 2013
- Abate by
- May 31, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $2,000 · Current $1,000 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.132(d)(2): The employer did not verify that the required workplace hazard assessment has been performed through a written certification which included the requirements as outlined in 29 CFR 1910.132(d)(2):(a)(LOCATION)(IDENTIFY SPECIFIC OPERATION(S) AND/OR CONDITIONS)(DESCRIBE HAZARD(S) WHERE NECESSARY) The employer failed to conduct hazard assessments prior to exposing employees to potential electrical hazards associated with employees working on high voltage electrical wiring without wearing the appropriate personnel protective equipment that meets the requirements of NFPA 70E and required by Subpart I of this part. This was most recently evident during the inspection of the facility located at 3445 Stolley Park Road, Grand Island, NE 68802, where the employer has an employee wiring in a Miller wire welder into an existing bus box with live exposed parts without requiring that they de-energize and lockout the bus bar or wear the necessary personnel protective equipment to prevent an employee from being injured in the event of an arc flash as demonstrated in this accident. Instances of personnel protective equipment include but are not limited to: i. Employee working on the bus box without wearing arc flash protective jacket or pants to protect body. ii. Employee working on the bus box without wearing arc flash protective hood and helmet to protect face, neck and head. iii. Employees working on the bus box without wearing arc flash protective gloves to protect hands.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1000
- — Z (S) $2000
1910.147 C07 IV
- Issued
- Apr 18, 2013
- Abate by
- May 23, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $2,000 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(7)(iv): The employer did not certify that employee training had been accomplished and kept up to date:(a) (LOCATION) (IDENTIFY SPECIFIC OPERATIONS AND/OR CONDITIONS) (IDENTIFY MACHINERY OR EQUIPMENT) (DESCRIBE WHETHER LACK OF TRAINING, OR NOT KEPT UP TO DATE, OR BOTH) The employer failed to certify that authorized lockout and tag out employees were trained in accordance with this subpart on the potential electrical and stored energy hazards associated with employees working on high voltage electrical wiring and the application of locks and tags used in maintaining de-energized equipment. This was most recently evident during the inspection of the facility located at 3445 Stolley Park Road, Grand Island, NE 68802, where the employer has an employee for whom he has no certification to demonstrate what training he has received, wiring in a Miller wire welder into an existing bus box on a live bus bar system without locking out the live bus bar first.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $2000
1910.333 B02
- Issued
- Apr 18, 2013
- Abate by
- May 31, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $1,960 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.333(b)(2): While an employee was exposed to contact with parts of fixed electric equipment or circuits which were deenergized, the circuits energizing the parts were not locked out or tagged or both in accordance with the requirements of this paragraph (b) of 29 CFR 1910.333(b)(2): The employer failed to protect employees from potential electrical hazards associated with employees working on high voltage electrical wiring without locking out and or tagging out the live energy source to the equipment they were working on. This was most recently evident during the inspection of the facility located at 3445 Stolley Park Road, Grand Island, NE 68802, where the employer has an employee wiring in a Miller wire welder into an existing bus box with live exposed parts without requiring that they de-energize and lockout the bus bar.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1960
- — Z (S) $2800
1910.335 A01 I
- Issued
- Apr 18, 2013
- Abate by
- May 31, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $2,800
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.335(a)(1)(i): Employees working in areas where there were potential electrical hazards were not using electrical protective equipment that was appropriate for the specific parts of the body to be protected and for the work to be performed:(a) (LOCATION) (IDENTIFY SPECIFIC OPERATIONS AND/OR CONDITIONS) The employer failed to protect employees from potential electrical hazards associated with employees working on high voltage electrical wiring without wearing the appropriate personnel protective equipment that meets the requirements of NFPA 70E and required by Subpart I of this part. This was most recently evident during the inspection of the facility located at 3445 Stolley Park Road, Grand Island, NE 68802, where the employer has an employee wiring in a Miller wire welder into an existing bus box with live exposed parts without requiring that they de-energize and lockout the bus bar or wear the necessary personnel protective equipment to prevent an employee from being injured in the event of an arc flash as demonstrated in this accident. Instances of personnel protective equipment include but are not limited to: i. Employee working on the bus box without wearing arc flash protective jacket or pants to protect body. ii. Employee working on the bus box without wearing arc flash protective hood and helmet to protect face, neck and head. iii. Employees working on the bus box without wearing arc flash protective gloves to protect hands.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2800
- — Z (S) $2800
More inspections at Mettenbrink Electric Corp
View Mettenbrink Electric Corp's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238210)
More inspections in NE
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 338658230.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.