Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: QUALITY TRAILERS ENTERPRISE INC.

Complaint inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of QUALITY TRAILERS ENTERPRISE INC. in 1664 SALEM PARKWAY WEST, SALEM, OH 44460 (NAICS 336214). OSHA activity number 338671837.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Quality Trailers Enterprise INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Quality Trailers Enterprise INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
1664 SALEM PARKWAY WEST
City
SALEM
State
OH
ZIP
44460
Mailing
1664 SALEM PARKWAY WEST, SALEM, OH 44460
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
336214
Employees
30
Ownership type
A

12 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.95 C01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 30 exposed
Issued
May 10, 2013
Abate by
Jul 30, 2013
Penalty
Initial $4,900 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.95(c)(1): The employer did not administer a continuing, effective hearing conservation program, as described in paragraphs (c) through (o) of this section, whenever employee noise exposures equal or exceed an 8-hour time-weighted average sound level (TWA) of 85 decibels measured on the A scale (slow response) or, equivalently, a dose of fifty percent:    The employer had not developed and implemented a hearing conservation program for employees expsoed to 8-hour time-weighted average (TWA) sound levels of 85 dBA or greater (50% dose). An employee working in the tube making area was exposed to continuous noise at 66.3% of the permissible daily noise exposure during the 425 minute sampling period on 04/02/2013; exposure calculations include a zero increment for the 55 minutes not sampled.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (S) $4900

1910.107 G02

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 30 exposed
Issued
May 10, 2013
Abate by
Jun 6, 2013
Penalty
Initial $4,900 · Current $2,940 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.107(g)(2): All spraying areas were not kept as free from the accumulation of deposits of combustible residues as practical, with cleaning conducted daily if necessary:    On or about February 4, 2013, the employer did not keep surfaces, such as but not limited to, walls, floors, rafters and filters free from the accumulation of combustible residue.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2940
  • — Z (S) $4900

1910.132 D02

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 30 exposed
Issued
May 10, 2013
Abate by
May 25, 2013
Penalty
Initial $2,100 · Current $1,260 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.132(d)(2): The employer did not verify, through a written certification, the identity of the workplace evaluated, the person certifying that the evaluation had been performed, and the date the hazard assessment was done:    On or about February 4, 2013, the workplace hazard assessment had not been put in writing and certified with the person conducting the evaluation and the dates the hazard assessment was completed.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1260
  • — Z (S) $2100

1910.132 F01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 30 exposed
Issued
May 10, 2013
Abate by
May 30, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.132(f)(1): The employer did not provide training to each employee who is required by this section to use personal protective equipment:  On or about February 4, 2013, employees required to wear personal protective equipment have not been trained on its use. Employees are working with propane, acetylene, paints, oils and welding fumes. Employees are required to wear welding helmets and gloves during welding acitivities and full face respirators during painting acitivities.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.132 H01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 70 exposed
Issued
May 10, 2013
Abate by
May 30, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.132(h)(1): Personal protective equipement was not being provided by the employer at no cost to employees.    On or about February 4, 2013, the employer did not provide welding helmets to employees when the personal protective equipment was required.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.253 B04 I

Deleted Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 30 exposed
Issued
May 10, 2013
Abate by
May 20, 2013
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.253(b)(4)(i): Oxygen cylinders were stored near highly combustible material, especially oil and grease; or near reserve stocks of carbide and acetylene or other fuel-gas cylinders, or near other substance likely to cause or accelerate fire:     On or about February 4, 2013, the employer had a oxygen tank and acetylene tank stored together.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $2800

1910.1200 E01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 30 exposed
Issued
May 10, 2013
Abate by
May 30, 2013
Penalty
Initial $2,100 · Current $1,260 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met:    On or about February 4, 2013, the company did not implement and maintain a written hazard communication program at the site. Employees work with hazardous materials such as, but not limited to propane, acetylene, paint, oil, and welding fumes.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1260
  • — Z (S) $2100

1910.1200 H01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 30 exposed
Issued
May 10, 2013
Abate by
May 30, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area:    On or about February 4, 2013, the employer did not provide training or information to employees working with hazardous chemicals such as but not limited to propane, acetylene, paint, oil and welding fumes.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 C01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 30 exposed
Issued
May 10, 2013
Abate by
Jul 30, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1): The employer did not ensure that a written respiratory protection program with worksite-specific procedures was established and implemented to include the provisions of (i)-(ix), as applicable:    On or about February 4, 2013, the employer did not establish and implement a written respiratory protection program for employees including, but not limited to, those who are required to wear full face tight fitting respirator when painting trailers.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.134 E01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 30 exposed
Issued
May 10, 2013
Abate by
Jul 30, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employees ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace:    On or about February 4, 2013, the employees required to use full-face tight-fitting respirators, including but not limited to painters, had not received medical evaluations.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.134 F01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 30 exposed
Issued
May 10, 2013
Abate by
Jul 30, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(f)(1): The employer did not ensure that employee(s) required to use a tight-fitting facepiece respirator passed the appropriate qualitative fit test (QLFT) or quantitative fit test (QNFT):     On or about February 4, 2013, employees required to use full-face tight-fitting respirators had not received a fit test.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.134 K

Other-than-serious 1 instance 30 exposed
Issued
May 10, 2013
Abate by
Jul 30, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(k): The employer did not provide comprehensive, understandable training which did not occur annually and/or more often if necessary:      On or about February 4, 2013, employees required to use full-face tight-fitting respirators including, but not limited to the painters did not have respirator training.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

View Quality Trailers Enterprise INC.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 338671837.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.