OSHA Inspection: SO. CAL SHIP SERVICES

Issued

2013-02-26 00:00:00

Abate by

2013-03-12 00:00:00

Penalty

Initial $2100.00 · Current $2100.00

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.134(f): The employee was required to use a respirator without being fit tested with the same make, model, style and size of respirator that was to be used:      a) SoCal Ship Services,Bay Area operation:  A deck hand was using a 3M dual cartridge half mask respirator but was fit tested for use of a full face dual cartridge respirator.

Issued

2013-02-26 00:00:00

Abate by

2013-03-12 00:00:00

Penalty

Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.134(c)(2)(i): Respirator users were not provided with the information contained in Appendix D to 29 CFR 1910.134 when the employer determined that any voluntary respirator use was permissible:      a) SoCal Ship Services, Bay Area operation:  A deck hand was provided a 3M N95 respirator and not provided the information contained in Appendix D of this standard.

Issued

2013-02-26 00:00:00

Abate by

2013-03-12 00:00:00

Penalty

Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.134(d)(1)(iii): The employer did not identify and evaluate the respiratory hazard(s) in the workplace; including a reasonable estimate of employee exposures to respiratory hazards and identification of the contaminants chemical state and physical form:        a)  SoCal Ship Services, Bay Area operation : An evaluation of the workplace was not conducted to evaluate respiratory hazards, including a reasonable estimate of employee exposures to respiratory hazards or identification of contaminants chemical state and physical harm.

Issued

2013-02-26 00:00:00

Abate by

2013-03-12 00:00:00

Penalty

Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.134(l)(1): Evaluations of the workplace were not conducted to ensure the written respiratory protection program was being effectively implemented:      a) SoCal Ship Services, Bay Area operation:  An evaluation of the workplace was not conducted to ensure the respiratory protection program was being effectively implemented.