OSHA Inspection: ANGELIC GROUP, INC.

Issued

May 17, 2013

Abate by

Jun 21, 2013

Penalty

Initial $400 · Current $400

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1903.19(c)(1): The employer did not certify to OSHA, within 10 calendar days after the abatement date, that the cited violation had been abated:  a)  For Citation 1, Item 1, issued on 3/27/2013 with an abatement date of 4/8/2013, the employer did not certify the complete abatement of the cited violation.  b)  For Citation 2, Item 1, issued on 3/27/2013 with an abatement date of 4/15/2013, the employer did not certify the complete abatement of the cited violation.  c)  For Citation 2, Item 2, issued on 3/27/2013 with an abatement date of 4/15/2013, the employer did not certify the complete abatement of the cited violation.  d)  For Citation 2, Item 3, issued on 3/27/2013 with an abatement date of 4/22/2013, the employer did not certify the complete abatement of the cited violation.

Issued

Mar 27, 2013

Abate by

Apr 8, 2013

Penalty

Initial $1,200 · Current $1,200

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.303(g)(2)(i): Except as elsewhere required or permitted by this standard, live parts of electric equipment operating at 50 volts or more were not guarded against accidental contact by use of approved cabinets or other forms of approved enclosures or by any means in [A] through [D] of this section:    Employees operating the circuit breaker switches were exposed to electrical shock and the employer did not ensure live parts were guarded against accidental contact.

Issued

Mar 27, 2013

Abate by

Apr 15, 2013

Penalty

Initial $0 · Current $0

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.134(c)(2)(ii):  The employer did not establish and implement those elements of a written program necessary to ensure that any employee using a respirator voluntarily was medically able to use that respirator, and that the respirator was cleaned, stored and maintained so as not to create a health hazard to the user:    Employees performing body repair work were exposed to respiratory use hazards and the employer did not establish and implement those elements of the standard necessary.

Issued

Mar 27, 2013

Abate by

Apr 15, 2013

Penalty

Initial $0 · Current $0

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1):  The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employees ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace:    Employees performing body repair work were exposed to respiratory use hazards and the employer did not establish and implement medical evaluation to determine the employees ability to use a respirator.

Issued

Mar 27, 2013

Abate by

Apr 22, 2013

Penalty

Initial $0 · Current $0

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200 will be met:    Employees were exposed to chemical hazards when using spray paint, kerosene, gasoline, brake cleaner and other chemicals.  The written hazard communication program did not address all of the requirements of the standard.  The written hazard communication program did not include:    a.	The methods the employer will use to inform employees of the hazards of non-routine tasks the employer assigns employees.    b.	The methods the employer will use to provide the other employers on-site access to material safety data sheets for each hazardous chemical the employees may be exposed to while working.    c.	The methods the employer will use to inform the other employers of any precautionary measures that need to be taken to protect employees during the workplace's normal operating conditions and in foreseeable emergencies.    d.	The methods the employer will use to inform the other employers of the labeling system used in the workplace.    e.	The methods the employer use to provide employee information on hazardous chemicals.