Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: CLAREMONT PROPERTIES, LLC

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of CLAREMONT PROPERTIES, LLC in 425 WASHINGTON STREET, CLAREMONT, NH 03743 (NAICS 493110). OSHA activity number 338742836.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Claremont Properties, LLC — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Claremont Properties, LLC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
425 WASHINGTON STREET
City
CLAREMONT
State
NH
ZIP
03743
Mailing
425 WASHINGTON STREET, CLAREMONT, NH 03743
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
493110
Employees
13
Ownership type
A

7 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.176 B

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 13 exposed
Issued
Apr 25, 2013
Abate by
May 7, 2013
Penalty
Initial $2,000 · Current $2,000
29 CFR 1910.176(b): Storage of material created a hazard:    a. Employees were not protected from struck-by and crushing hazards where storage racks loaded with material were not repaired after sustaining structural damage from being struck by powered industrial trucks.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2000

1910.178 L01 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Apr 25, 2013
Abate by
May 14, 2013
Penalty
Initial $2,000 · Current $2,000
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(1)(i): The employer did not ensure that each powered industrial truck operator is competent to operate a powered industrial truck safely, as demonstrated by the successful completion of the training and evaluation specified in this paragraph (l):    a. Warehouse- Employees were not protected from struck-by and crushing hazards where the employer failed to provide powered industrial truck training for forklift and electric pallet jack operators.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2000

1910.178 L04 III

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Apr 25, 2013
Abate by
May 14, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(4)(iii): An evaluation of each powered industrial truck operator's performance was not being conducted at least once every three years:    a. Warehouse- Employees were not protected from struck-by and crushing hazards where the employer failed to provide an evaluation of each powered industrial truck operator every three years after initial operator training was provided.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.178 Q07

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 8 exposed
Issued
Apr 25, 2013
Abate by
May 14, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.178(q)(7): Industrial trucks were not examined before being placed in service:    a. Warehouse- Employees were not protected from struck-by and crushing hazards where the employer failed to inspect powered industrial trucks before placing them into service on a daily basis.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.133 A01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 8 exposed
Issued
Apr 25, 2013
Abate by
May 1, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.133(a)(1): Protective eye and face equipment was not required where there was a reasonable probability of injury that could be prevented by such equipment:     a. Warehouse- Eye and face protection was not required to be worn by employees when adding water to powered industrial truck batteries which contain sulfuric acid.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.138 A

Other-than-serious 1 instance 8 exposed
Issued
Apr 25, 2013
Abate by
May 1, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.138(a): The employer did not select and require employee(s) to use appropriate hand protection when employees' hands were exposed to hazards such as those from skin absorption of harmful substances; severe cuts or lacerations; severe abrasion:    a. Warehouse- Hand protection was not required to be worn by employees when adding water to powered industrial truck batteries which contain sulfuric acid.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.151 C

Other-than-serious 1 instance 8 exposed
Issued
Apr 25, 2013
Abate by
May 7, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.151(c): Where employees were exposed to injurious corrosive materials, suitable facilities for quick drenching or flushing of the eyes and body were not provided within the work area for immediate emergency use:    a. Warehouse- An eye wash was not provided by the employer where employees were adding water to powered industrial truck batteries which contain sulfuric acid.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (O) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 338742836.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.