WOLCOTT, CT —
OSHA Inspection: ARTIE'S AUTO BODY, INC.
Complaint inspection · Health discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of ARTIE'S AUTO BODY, INC. in 49 POTUCCOS RING RD, WOLCOTT, CT 06716 (NAICS 811121). OSHA activity number 338785439.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- ARTIE'S AUTO BODY, INC.
- Site address
- 49 POTUCCOS RING RD
- City
- WOLCOTT
- State
- CT
- ZIP
- 06716
- Mailing
- 49 POTUCCOS RING RD, WOLCOTT, CT 06716
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Health
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 811121
- Employees
- 9
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
4 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.107 H12
- Issued
- Feb 14, 2013
- Abate by
- May 9, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.107(h)(12): Fire protection. All areas used for spraying, including the interior of the booth, shall be protected by automatic sprinklers where this protection is available. Where this protection is not available, other approved automatic extinguishing equipment shall be provided. Facility: Employees were required to conduct auto body spray operations within a spray booth where there were no automatic sprinklers to provide fire suppression.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.134 E01
- Issued
- Feb 14, 2013
- Abate by
- May 9, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $1,360 · Current $952 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace: Facility: Employees were required to utilize respirators without being provided a medical evaluation to determine if the employee was medically cleared wear a respirator.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $952
- — Z (S) $1360
1910.134 F
- Issued
- Feb 14, 2013
- Abate by
- May 9, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(f): The employee was required to use a respirator without being fit tested with the same make, model, style and size of respirator that was to be used: Facility: Employees were required to utilize respirators without being fit tested prior to use to determine proper fit of the mask to the employee.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.134 C
- Issued
- Feb 14, 2013
- Abate by
- May 9, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(c): The employer did not develop and implement a written respiratory protection program with required worksite-specific procedures and elements for required respirator use: Facility: The company required employees to wear respirators but did not have a written respiratory protection program in place with site-specific procedures and elements outlining respirator use.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (O) $0
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 811121)
More inspections in CT
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 338785439.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.