Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,198,201Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-31 Last loaded 2026-09-03

OSHA Inspection: BRIGHT HARVEST SWEET POTATO CO.

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of BRIGHT HARVEST SWEET POTATO CO. in 509 TAYLOR, CLARKSVILLE, AR 72830 (NAICS 311999). OSHA activity number 338864838.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Bright Harvest Sweet Potato CO. for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Bright Harvest Sweet Potato CO. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
509 TAYLOR
City
CLARKSVILLE
State
AR
ZIP
72830
Mailing
P.O. BOX 528, CLARKSVILLE, AR 72830
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
Non-union (B)
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
311999
Employees
104
Ownership type
Private (A)

2 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.147 D04 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Mar 13, 2013
Abate by
Mar 28, 2013
Penalty
Initial $3,825 · Current $2,295 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.147(d)(4)(i):     Lockout or tagout devices shall be affixed to each energy isolating device by authorized employees.    On or about February 13, 2013 and times prior thereto, employer did not effectively lockout equipment when removing a guard to clear equipment.  In the mixing room employees remove the expanded metal screen from the hopper to clear clogged material without applying a lock to the energy isolating device exposing them to amputation hazards in the event of an unexpected startup.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $2295
  • · Z (S) $3825

1910.212 A01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Mar 13, 2013
Abate by
Mar 28, 2013
Penalty
Initial $3,060 · Current $1,836 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1):     One or more methods of machine guarding was not provided to protect the operator and other employees in the machine area from hazards such as those created by point of operation, ingoing nip points, rotating parts, flying chips and sparks:    On or about February 13, 2013 and times prior thereto, employees were exposed to rotating parts and ingoing nip points in the following instances:    instance a.) The South Bend Lathe in the maintenance area was not equipped with a chuck guard exposing employees to the rotating chuck and jaws.    instance b.) The end of the mesh chain conveyor where it exits the freezer in the pack-out area has an exposed ingoing nip point where it passes over the end roller exposing employees to caught-in injuries.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1836
  • · Z (S) $3060

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 338864838.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.