OSHA Inspection: HAFA ADIA SHOOTING GALLERY

Issued

Mar 29, 2013

Abate by

Apr 10, 2013

Penalty

Initial $1,360 · Current $1,020 Reduced

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.134(c): The employer did not develop and implement a written respiratory protection program with required worksite-specific procedures and elements for required respirator use:  Facility: On Feburary 12, 2013, and at times prior thereto, the employer had not developed or implemented a written respiratory protection program when employees were required to wear half mask respirators with P100 filters when cleaning the shooting gallery.

Issued

Mar 29, 2013

Penalty

Initial $0 · Current $0

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace:  Facility: On Feburary 12, 2013, and at times prior thereto, the employer did not provide employees who were required to wear half mask respirators with P100 filters with medical evaluations.

Issued

Mar 29, 2013

Penalty

Initial $0 · Current $0

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.134(f)(1): The employer did not ensure that employee(s) required to use a tight-fitting facepiece respirator passed the appropriate qualitative fit test (QLFT) or quantitative fit test (QNFT):  Facility: On Feburary 12, 2013, and at times prior thereto, the employer did not provide employees who were required to wear half mask respirators with P100 filters with fit test.

Issued

Mar 29, 2013

Abate by

Apr 10, 2013

Penalty

Initial $2,040 · Current $1,530 Reduced

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.1025(h)(1): All surfaces were not maintained as free as practicable of accumulations of lead:  Facility: On Feburary 14, 2013, and at times prior thereto, the employer did not ensure all working surfaces were as free as practicable from lead accumulation;  A. A wipe, measuring less than one square foot, of the door knob leading into the gun range that employees touch and use throughout the day contained 612.0 micrograms of lead.  B. A wipe of an employee's hands after he had cleaned and removed his gloves, which he had believed were clean, contained 135.4 micrograms of lead.

Issued

Mar 29, 2013

Abate by

Apr 10, 2013

Penalty

Initial $1,360 · Current $1,020 Reduced

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.1025(l)(1)(i): Employee(s) working in an area where there is potential exposure to airborne lead at any level were not informed of the content of Appendices A and B of 29 CFR 1910.1025:  Facility: On Feburary 14, 2013, and at times prior thereto, the employer had not provided employees who were responsible for cleaning and maintaining the indoor shooting range, with the information required in this section.

Issued

Mar 29, 2013

Abate by

Apr 10, 2013

Penalty

Initial $0 · Current $0

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.132(d)(2): The employer did not verify that the required workplace hazard assessment has been performed through a written certification which included the requirements as outlined in 29 CFR 1910.132(d)(2):  Facility: On Feburary 12, 2013, and at times prior thereto, the employer had not certified a personal protective hazard assessment had been conducted which outlined what employees need to wear when performing a specific job task.

Issued

Mar 29, 2013

Abate by

Apr 10, 2013

Penalty

Initial $0 · Current $0

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.1025(d)(2): An initial determination was not made to determine if any employee may be exposed to lead at or above the action level:  Facility: On Feburary 14, 2013, and at times prior thereto, the employer had not conducted an initial determination for employees who were responsible for cleaning and maintaining the indoor shooting range.