NORTH HUNTINGDON, PA ·
OSHA Inspection: SCOTTDALE BUILDERS
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of SCOTTDALE BUILDERS in BOB MASSIE TOYOTA SITE, NORTH HUNTINGDON, PA 15642 (NAICS 238120). OSHA activity number 338907355.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- SCOTTDALE BUILDERS
- Site address
- BOB MASSIE TOYOTA SITE
- City
- NORTH HUNTINGDON
- State
- PA
- ZIP
- 15642
- Mailing
- 320 WESLEY CHAPEL ROAD, SCOTTDALE, PA 15683
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- Non-union (B)
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238120
- Employees
- 11
- Ownership type
- Private (A)
Citations
4 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.453 B02 V
- Issued
- Feb 27, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $1,360 · Current $810 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.453(b)(2)(v): A body belt with lanyard attached to the boom or basket was not worn by employee(s) working from an aerial lift: (a) Jobsite, Bob Massie Toyota, North Huntingdon, PA: On or about 02/15/13 employees working in JLG aerial lifts were not wearing a harness with a lanyard attached to the boom or basket. The potential fall hazard to the employees was approximately 24 feet to the ground.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $810
- · Z (S) $1360
1926.760 A01
- Issued
- Feb 27, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $1,700 · Current $1,000 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.760(a)(1): Each employee engaged in a steel erection activity who is on a walking/working surface with an unprotected side or edge more than 15 feet (4.6 m) above a lower level was not protected from fall hazards by guardrail systems, safety net systems, personal fall arrest systems, positioning device systems, or fall restraint systems: (a) Jobsite, Bob Massie Toyota, North Huntingdon, PA: On or about 02/15/13 employees engaged in a steel erection activity, laying decking, who were approximately 24 feet above a lower level, were not protected from falling by the use of guardrail systems, safety net systems, personal fall arrest systems, positioning devices systems or fall restraints in accordance with the requirements of this standard.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1000
- · Z (S) $1700
1926.454 C03
- Issued
- Feb 27, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $1,020 · Current $590 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.454(c)(3): The employer failed to retrain affected employees who were working with scaffolds that showed indications through work performance of not retaining the requisite proficiency: (a) Jobsite, Bob Massie Toyota, North Huntingdon, PA: On or about 02/15/13 the employer failed to retrain employees who were working from aerial lifts without adequate fall protection which indicated the employees had not retained the requisite proficiency of working safely from scaffolds.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $590
- · Z (S) $1020
1926.761 B
- Issued
- Feb 27, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.761(b): The employer did not train each employee exposed to a fall hazard in accordance with the requirements of this section. The employer shall institute a training program and ensure employee participation in the program: (a) Jobsite, Bob Massie Toyota, North Huntingdon, PA: On or about 02/15/13 the employer did not train all employees engaged in steel erection activities that were exposed to fall hazards of approximately 24 feet in accordance with the requirements of this section. Employees were performing steel erection activities and were utilizing a "safety monitor" as a method for fall protection which is not a viable option under this section.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238120)
More inspections in PA
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 338907355.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.