Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,196,991Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-24 Last loaded 2026-08-27

OSHA Inspection: ADVANCED LASER BODY CARE INSTITUTE

Complaint inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of ADVANCED LASER BODY CARE INSTITUTE in SUITE 313 1165 N. CLARK ST., CHICAGO, IL 60610 (NAICS 812199). OSHA activity number 338907694.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Advanced Laser Body Care Institute for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Advanced Laser Body Care Institute is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
SUITE 313 1165 N. CLARK ST.
City
CHICAGO
State
IL
ZIP
60610
Mailing
3155 BOOK RD. SUITE 103, NAPERVILLE, IL 60610
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
Non-union (B)
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
812199
Employees
10
Ownership type
Private (A)

6 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.133 A01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Mar 8, 2013
Abate by
Apr 3, 2013
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $1,400 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.133(a)(1): The employer shall ensure that each affected employee uses appropriate eye or face protection when exposed to eye or face hazards from flying particles, molten metal, liquid chemicals, acids or caustic liquids, chemical gases or vapors, or potentially injurious light radiation.    a) During the period of October 26, 2012 through February 26, 2013, at the above located workplace, employees were required to work with a Palomar StarLux hair removal system. The employees were exposed to Intense Pulsed Light (IPL).  The employer provided and required the employees to wear a pair Intrgra P Z87.1 safety glasses. The safety glasses had cracks in both side shields and the lenses did not provide the required (ANSI Z136.3) eye protection.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1400
  • · Z (S) $2800

1910.1030 C01 I

Other-than-serious 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Mar 8, 2013
Abate by
Apr 3, 2013
Penalty
Initial $1,200 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1030(c)(1)(i):  The employer having employee(s) occupational exposure did not established a written Exposure Control Plan designed to eliminate or minimize employee exposure:    a) During the period of October 26, 2012 through February 26, 2013, at the above located workplace, employees were exposed to contaminated needles during Botox procedures. The employer had not established an effective written bloodborne pathogens exposure control plan to eliminate or minimize the employee's exposure.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $0
  • · Z (S) $1200

1910.1030 D02 I

Other-than-serious 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Mar 8, 2013
Abate by
Apr 3, 2013
Penalty
Initial $1,600 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1030(d)(2)(i): Engineering and work practice controls were not used to eliminate or minimize employee exposure:    a) During the period of October 26, 2012 through February 26, 2013, at the above located workplace, employees were required to work with BD Insulin Syringes with BD Ultra-Fine Needles and BD 3 ml Syringes with BD Precision Glide Needles. These syringes and needles did not have engineered sharps injury protection, and placed the employees at an increased risk of needle sticks. Effective and appropriate sharps with engineered sharps injury protection were commercially available. Employees using the syringes and needles without engineered sharps injury protection were therefore exposed to the hazards associated with blood borne disease.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $0
  • · Z (S) $1600

1910.1030 D02 VII

Other-than-serious 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Mar 8, 2013
Abate by
Apr 3, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1030(d)(2)(vii): Contaminated needles and/or other contaminated sharps were bent, recapped, or removed:    a) During the period of October 26, 2012 through February 26, 2013, at the above located workplace, employees were required to recap contaminated needles. Recapping needles placed the employees at an increased risk of needlesticks. Employees were therefore exposed to the hazards associated with bloodborne disease.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.132 D02

Other-than-serious 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Mar 8, 2013
Abate by
Apr 3, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.132(d)(2):  The employer did not verify that the required work place hazard assessment had been performed through a written certification.    a) During the period of October 26, 2012 through February 14, 2013, at the above located workplace, employees were required to wear personal protective equipment such as gloves, eye protection, and other equipment. The employer did not verify that the required workplace hazard assessment had been performed through a written certification.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $0
  • · Z (O) $0

1910.1030 D04 III C

Other-than-serious 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Mar 8, 2013
Abate by
Apr 3, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1030(d)(4)(iii)(C):  Disposal of all regulated waste was not in accordance with applicable regulations of the United States, States and Territories, and political subdivisions of States and Territories:    a) During the period of October 26, 2012 through February 14, 2013, at the above located workplace, the employer did not maintain proof of proper disposal of contaminated needles and other regulated waste (as required by the Illinois Environmental Protection Agency).
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $0
  • · Z (O) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 338907694.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.