CHICAGO, IL ·
OSHA Inspection: ADVANCED LASER BODY CARE INSTITUTE
Complaint inspection · Health discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of ADVANCED LASER BODY CARE INSTITUTE in SUITE 313 1165 N. CLARK ST., CHICAGO, IL 60610 (NAICS 812199). OSHA activity number 338907694.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- ADVANCED LASER BODY CARE INSTITUTE
- Site address
- SUITE 313 1165 N. CLARK ST.
- City
- CHICAGO
- State
- IL
- ZIP
- 60610
- Mailing
- 3155 BOOK RD. SUITE 103, NAPERVILLE, IL 60610
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Health
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- Non-union (B)
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 812199
- Employees
- 10
- Ownership type
- Private (A)
Citations
6 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.133 A01
- Issued
- Mar 8, 2013
- Abate by
- Apr 3, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $1,400 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.133(a)(1): The employer shall ensure that each affected employee uses appropriate eye or face protection when exposed to eye or face hazards from flying particles, molten metal, liquid chemicals, acids or caustic liquids, chemical gases or vapors, or potentially injurious light radiation. a) During the period of October 26, 2012 through February 26, 2013, at the above located workplace, employees were required to work with a Palomar StarLux hair removal system. The employees were exposed to Intense Pulsed Light (IPL). The employer provided and required the employees to wear a pair Intrgra P Z87.1 safety glasses. The safety glasses had cracks in both side shields and the lenses did not provide the required (ANSI Z136.3) eye protection.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1400
- · Z (S) $2800
1910.1030 C01 I
- Issued
- Mar 8, 2013
- Abate by
- Apr 3, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $1,200 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1030(c)(1)(i): The employer having employee(s) occupational exposure did not established a written Exposure Control Plan designed to eliminate or minimize employee exposure: a) During the period of October 26, 2012 through February 26, 2013, at the above located workplace, employees were exposed to contaminated needles during Botox procedures. The employer had not established an effective written bloodborne pathogens exposure control plan to eliminate or minimize the employee's exposure.
Recent events (2)
- · I (O) $0
- · Z (S) $1200
1910.1030 D02 I
- Issued
- Mar 8, 2013
- Abate by
- Apr 3, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $1,600 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1030(d)(2)(i): Engineering and work practice controls were not used to eliminate or minimize employee exposure: a) During the period of October 26, 2012 through February 26, 2013, at the above located workplace, employees were required to work with BD Insulin Syringes with BD Ultra-Fine Needles and BD 3 ml Syringes with BD Precision Glide Needles. These syringes and needles did not have engineered sharps injury protection, and placed the employees at an increased risk of needle sticks. Effective and appropriate sharps with engineered sharps injury protection were commercially available. Employees using the syringes and needles without engineered sharps injury protection were therefore exposed to the hazards associated with blood borne disease.
Recent events (2)
- · I (O) $0
- · Z (S) $1600
1910.1030 D02 VII
- Issued
- Mar 8, 2013
- Abate by
- Apr 3, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1030(d)(2)(vii): Contaminated needles and/or other contaminated sharps were bent, recapped, or removed: a) During the period of October 26, 2012 through February 26, 2013, at the above located workplace, employees were required to recap contaminated needles. Recapping needles placed the employees at an increased risk of needlesticks. Employees were therefore exposed to the hazards associated with bloodborne disease.
Recent events (2)
- · I (O) $0
- · Z (S) $0
1910.132 D02
- Issued
- Mar 8, 2013
- Abate by
- Apr 3, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.132(d)(2): The employer did not verify that the required work place hazard assessment had been performed through a written certification. a) During the period of October 26, 2012 through February 14, 2013, at the above located workplace, employees were required to wear personal protective equipment such as gloves, eye protection, and other equipment. The employer did not verify that the required workplace hazard assessment had been performed through a written certification.
Recent events (2)
- · I (O) $0
- · Z (O) $0
1910.1030 D04 III C
- Issued
- Mar 8, 2013
- Abate by
- Apr 3, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1030(d)(4)(iii)(C): Disposal of all regulated waste was not in accordance with applicable regulations of the United States, States and Territories, and political subdivisions of States and Territories: a) During the period of October 26, 2012 through February 14, 2013, at the above located workplace, the employer did not maintain proof of proper disposal of contaminated needles and other regulated waste (as required by the Illinois Environmental Protection Agency).
Recent events (2)
- · I (O) $0
- · Z (O) $0
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 812199)
More inspections in IL
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 338907694.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.