Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: VOORHIES MACHINE SHOP, INC.

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of VOORHIES MACHINE SHOP, INC. in 422 WEST WASHINGTON STREET, NEW IBERIA, LA 70560 (NAICS 332710). OSHA activity number 338909112.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Voorhies Machine Shop, INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Voorhies Machine Shop, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
422 WEST WASHINGTON STREET
City
NEW IBERIA
State
LA
ZIP
70560
Mailing
422 WEST WASHINGTON STREET, NEW IBERIA, LA 70560
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
332710
Employees
14
Ownership type
A

2 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.212 A01

Serious Gravity 10 7 instances 1 exposed
Issued
May 15, 2013
Abate by
Jun 4, 2013
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1): One or more methods of machine guarding shall be provided to protect the operator and other employees in the machine area from hazards such as those created by point of operation, ingoing nip points, rotating parts, flying chips and sparks:    Instance 1: On or about 02/14/2013, in the Machine Shop, the employer did not ensure that the rotating element/chuck of the 12" lathe used to repair steel parts was equipped with a chuck guard; manufactured by Yamazaki Machine Works, Ltd.     Instance 2: On or about 02/14/2013, in the Machine Shop, the employer did not ensure that the rotating element/chuck of the 20" lathe used to repair steel parts was equipped with a chuck guard; manufactured by LeBlond Ltd.     Instance 3: On or about 02/14/2013, in the Machine Shop, the employer did not ensure that the rotating element/chuck of the 16" lathe used to repair steel parts was equipped with a chuck guard; manufactured by ACRA Machinery.     Instance 4: On or about 02/14/2013, in the Machine Shop, the employer did not ensure that the rotating element/chuck of the 14" lathe used to repair steel parts was equipped with a chuck guard; manufactured by Kingston Machine Tool.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $2800

1910.212 A03 II

Serious Gravity 10 6 instances 1 exposed
Issued
May 15, 2013
Abate by
Jun 4, 2013
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $1,300 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(3)(ii): The point of operation of machines whose operation exposes an employee to injury shall be guarded. The guarding device shall be in conformity with any appropriate standards therefor, or, in the absence of applicable specific standards, shall be so designed and constructed as to prevent the operator from having any part of his body in the danger zone during the operating cycle:    Instance 1: On or about 02/14/2013, in the Machine Shop, the employer did not ensure that the points of operation of the vertical milling machines used to repair steel parts were equipped with a guard; manufactured by Republic Lagun Machine Tool Company.     Instance 2: On or about 02/14/2013, in the Machine Shop, the employer did not ensure that the point of operation of the horizontal milling machine used to repair steel parts was equipped with a guard.    Instance 3: On or about 02/14/2013, in the Machine Shop, the employer did not ensure that the point of operation/drill bit of the Wilton drill press was equipped with a guard to protect the operator while drilling holes in carbon and stainless steel.     Instance 4: On or about 02/14/2013, in the Machine Shop, the employer did not ensure that the point of operation/drill bit of the Tominaga Machinery Drill Press was equipped with a guard to protect the operator while drilling holes in carbon and stainless steel.    Instance 5: On or about 02/14/2013, in the Machine Shop, the employer failed to ensure that the point of operation/drill bit of the Republic Lagun Machine Tool Co. drill press was equipped with a guard to protect the operator while drilling holes in carbon and stainless steel.    Instance 6: On or about 02/14/2013, in the Machine Shop, the employer did not ensure that the point of operation of the Dake Machine Tools hydraulic press was equipped with a guard to protect the operator while pressing steel.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1300
  • — Z (S) $2800

View Voorhies Machine Shop, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 338909112.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.