ALTOONA, PA —
OSHA Inspection: KEYSTONE PAIN INSTITUTE
Complaint inspection · Health discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of KEYSTONE PAIN INSTITUTE in 3109 FAIRWAY DRIVE, ALTOONA, PA 16602 (NAICS 621112). OSHA activity number 338911316.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- KEYSTONE PAIN INSTITUTE
- Site address
- 3109 FAIRWAY DRIVE
- City
- ALTOONA
- State
- PA
- ZIP
- 16602
- Mailing
- 3109 FAIRWAY DRIVE, ALTOONA, PA 16602
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Complete (A)
- Discipline
- Health
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 621112
- Employees
- 10
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
9 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.1030 C02 I
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $6300.00 · Current $2025.00 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1030(c)(2)(i): Each employer who has an employee(s) with occupational exposure as defined by paragraph (b) of this section shall prepare an exposure determination: a) In the facility, on or about February 15, 2013 - The employer did not prepare an exposure determination for employees with occupational exposure to blood and/or bloodborne pathogens. ABATEMENT NOTE: The exposure determination shall contain the following: A) A list of all job classifications in which all employees in those job classifications have occupational exposure; B) A list of job classifications in which some employees have occupational exposure, and C) A list of all tasks and procedures or groups of closely related task and procedures in which occupational exposure occurs and that are performed by employees in job classifications listed in accordance with the provisions of paragraph (c)(2)(i)(B) of this standard.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $2025
- — C (S) $6300
- — Z (S) $6300
1910.1030 D02 I
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $6300.00 · Current $0.00 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1030(d)(2)(i): Engineering and work practice controls were not used to eliminate or minimize employees exposure: a) In the Facility, on or about February 15, 2013 - The employer did not utilize engineering controls for the IV Catheters used at the facility.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $0
- — C (S) $6300
- — Z (S) $6300
1910.1030 D04 I
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $6300.00 · Current $2025.00 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1030(d)(4)(i): The employer did not determine and implement an appropriate written schedule for cleaning and method of decontamination based upon the location within the facility, type of surface to be cleaned, type of soil present, and tasks or procedures being performed in the area: a) In the Urine Processing Room, on or about February 15, 2013 - The employer did not implement a written schedule for the cleaning and method of decontamination.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $2025
- — C (S) $6300
- — Z (S) $6300
1910.1030 D04 III B 1II
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $6300.00 · Current $6300.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1030(d)(4)(iii)(B)(1)(ii): Regulated waste containers were not constructed to contain all contents and prevent leakage of fluids during handling, storage, transport or shipping: a) In the Urine Processing Room, on or about February 15, 2013 - The portable urine container holding regulated waste was not constructed to prevent leakage of fluids during handling.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $6300
- — C (S) $6300
- — Z (S) $6300
1910.1030 D04 III B1III
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1030(d)(4)(iii)(B)(1)(iii): Regulated waste was not labeled or color-coded in accordance with paragraph (g)(1)(i) of this standard: a) In the Urine Processing Room, on or about February 15, 2013 - The portable urine container holding regulated waste was not labeled or color coded.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $0
- — C (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.1030 D02 XI
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $6300.00 · Current $0.00 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1030(d)(2)(xi): Procedure(s) involving blood or other potentially infectious materials were not performed in such a manner as to minimize splashing, spraying, spattering, or generation of droplets of these substances: a) In the Urine Processing Room, on or about February 15, 2013 - The procedure of handling other potentially infectious materials, ie., urine, was not performed in a manner as to minimize splashing of the droplets of this substance.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $0
- — C (S) $6300
- — Z (S) $6300
1910.1030 F01 I
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $6300.00 · Current $2025.00 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1030(f)(1)(i): The employer shall make available the hepatitis B vaccine and vaccination series to all employees who have occupational exposure, and post-exposure evaluation and follow-up to all employees who have had an exposure incident: a) In the facility, on or about February 15, 2013 - The employer did not make available the hepatitis B vaccine and vaccination series to all employees who have occupational exposure to blood and/or bloodborne pathogens.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $2025
- — C (S) $6300
- — Z (S) $6300
1910.1030 G02 I
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $6300.00 · Current $2025.00 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1030(g)(2)(i): The employer did not provide training to each employee with occupational exposure in accordance with the requirements of this section: a) In the facility, on or about February 15, 2013 - The employer did not provide training to employees who have occupational exposure to blood and/or bloodborne pathogens.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $2025
- — C (S) $6300
- — Z (S) $6300
1910.132 D02
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $2700.00 · Current $2700.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.132(d)(2): The employer did not verify, through a written certification, the identity of the workplace evaluated, the person certifying that the evaluation had been performed, and the date the hazard assessment was done: a) In the facility, on or about February 15, 2013 - The employer did not verify through a written certification, that the required workplace personal protective equipment hazard assessment had been conducted. ABATEMENT NOTE: The required workplace hazard assessment shall be performed through a written certification that identifies the workplace evaluated; the person certifying that the evaluation has been performed; the date of the hazard assessment; and which identifies the document as a certification of hazard assessment.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $2700
- — C (S) $2700
- — Z (S) $2700
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 621112)
WEED, CA—2026-07-09
MOUNTAIN VALLEY HEALTH CENTER
CLAREMONT, NH—2026-06-22
WEST CENTRAL BEHAVIORAL HEALTH
SACRAMENTO, CA—2026-06-18
WELL SPACE HEALTH
SEDRO WOOLLEY, WA—2026-05-14
WA317991208 - TELECARE MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES OF WASHINGTON
ST GEORGE, UT—2026-04-20
ALTERNATIVE BEHAVIOR STRATEGIES, LLC
More inspections in PA
PHILADELPHIA, PA—2026-07-16
URUS CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION
JEFFERSON HILLS, PA—2026-07-16
MARATHON PETROLEUM COMPANY ASPHALT TERMINAL
SMITHFIELD, PA—2026-07-16
CARLISLE CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS
PITTSBURGH, PA—2026-07-15
DREAM GREENER LAWN & LANDSCAPE
COCHRANTON, PA—2026-07-15
CRAWFORD COUNTY HARDWOODS, LLC
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 338911316.