Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,192,068Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-04 Last loaded 2026-08-07

OSHA Inspection: BORETS-WEATHERFORD U.S., INC.

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of BORETS-WEATHERFORD U.S., INC. in YOUNT B #1 WELL, SEC 2-11N-3W OKLAHOMA CTY, OKLAHOMA CITY, OK 73129 (NAICS 213112). OSHA activity number 338911571.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Borets-Weatherford U.S., INC. for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Borets-Weatherford U.S., INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
YOUNT B #1 WELL, SEC 2-11N-3W OKLAHOMA CTY
City
OKLAHOMA CITY
State
OK
ZIP
73129
Mailing
1600 N. GARNETT RD., TULSA, OK 74116
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
213112
Employees
4
Ownership type
A

3 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.219 F01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
May 16, 2013
Abate by
Jun 10, 2013
Penalty
Initial $3,400 · Current $2,000 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.219(f)(1): Gear(s) were not guarded by a complete enclosure or by one of the methods specified in 29 CFR 1910.219(f)(1)(ii) and (f)(1)(iii):(a)     Spooling trailer on the well site:  On or about February 13, 2013, and times prior to, an employee operated the electric cable spooling trailer to dispense electric cable into the well bore.  The spooling trailer drive chain and sprockets were not adequately guarded exposing the employee to the hazard of in-running nip points.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $2000
  • · Z (S) $3400

1910.133 A01

Other-than-serious 2 instances 2 exposed
Issued
May 16, 2013
Abate by
May 20, 2013
Penalty
Initial $2,550 · Current $1,200 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.133(a)(1): The employer did not ensure that each affected employee uses appropriate eye or face protection when exposed to eye or face hazards from flying particles, molten metal, liquid chemicals, acids or caustic liquids, chemical gases or vapors, or potentially injurious light radiation:     Well site:  on or about February 13, 2013, employees supporting the installation of a down hole electric pump were not wearing protective eyewear.  This exposed them to the hazard of being struck in the eyes by work generated debris.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $1200
  • · Z (S) $2550

1910.135 A01

Other-than-serious 2 instances 2 exposed
Issued
May 16, 2013
Abate by
May 20, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.135(a)(1): The employer did not ensure that each affected employee wear a protective helmet when working in areas where there is a potential for injury to the head from falling objects:    Well site:  On or about February 13, 2013, employees supporting the installation of a down hole electric pump were not wearing protective helmets.  This exposed them to the hazard of being struck in the head by work falling objects used in the installation.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 338911571.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.