GRAFTON, WI —
OSHA Inspection: KAPCO, INC.
Referral inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a referral safety inspection of KAPCO, INC. in 1000 BADGER CR., GRAFTON, WI 53024 (NAICS 332116). OSHA activity number 338914542.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- KAPCO, INC.
- Site address
- 1000 BADGER CR.
- City
- GRAFTON
- State
- WI
- ZIP
- 53024
- Mailing
- P.O BOX 227, GRAFTON, WI 53024
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Referral (C)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 332116
- Employees
- 150
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
6 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.147 C04 II
- Issued
- May 2, 2013
- Abate by
- Jun 28, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $5,000 · Current $5,000
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(4)(ii): Procedures did not clearly and specifically outline the scope, purpose, authorization, rules, and techniques to be utilized for the control of hazardous energy, and the means to enforce compliance including, but not limited to, 29 CFR 1910.147(c)(4)(ii)(A), (c)(4)(ii)(B), (c)(4)(ii)(C) and (c)(4)(ii)(D): (a) The Lock Out Control Plan did not address all of the required items such as but not limited to: specific procedural steps to control all energy sources and techniques to be utilized for the control of hazardous energy.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $5000
- — Z (S) $5000
1910.147 C06 I
- Issued
- May 2, 2013
- Abate by
- Jun 19, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $5,000 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(6)(i): The employer did not conduct a periodic inspection of the energy control procedure at least annually to ensure that the procedure and the requirement of this standard were being followed: (a) The company did not conduct periodic inspections of the energy control procedures and authorized employees to ensure there were no deficiencies.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $5000
1910.212 A01
- Issued
- May 2, 2013
- Abate by
- May 29, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $4,000 · Current $2,800 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1): One or more methods of machine guarding was not provided to protect the operator and other employees in the machine area from hazards such as those created by point of operation, ingoing nip points, rotating parts, flying chips and sparks: (a) The Leadwell MCV-1500i (Vertical Machining Center) had doors which could be opened during operation and the loading/unloading of the parts which was not properly guarded exposing employees to moving parts. (b) The Kitamura mycenter 5 (Vertical Machining Center) had doors which could be opened during operation and the loading/unloading of the parts which was not properly guarded exposing employees to moving parts. (c) The Leadwell MV-50i (Vertical Machining Center) had doors which could be opened during operation and the loading/unloading of the parts which was not properly guarded exposing employees to moving parts. (d) The Haas 20 HP Vector Drive CNC had doors which could be opened during operation and the loading/unloading of the parts which was not properly guarded exposing employees to moving parts.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2800
- — Z (S) $4000
1910.212 A03 II
- Issued
- May 2, 2013
- Abate by
- May 29, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $7,000 · Current $4,900 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(3)(ii): Point(s) of operation of machinery were not guarded to prevent employee(s) from having any part of their body in the danger zone(s) during operating cycle(s): (a) On or about February 11, 2013, the Aida 250 had inadequate guarding when two operators were working on the same piece of equipment exposing one employee to the point of operation. (b) The Aida 250 had inadequate point of operation guarding on the back side of the punch press exposing employees to struck by hazards. (c) The Aida 200 #2 had inadequate point of operation guarding on the back side of the punch press exposing employees to struck by hazards. (d) The Aida 200 #5 had inadequate point of operation guarding on the back side of the punch press exposing employees to struck by hazards. (e) The Cincinnati 135 Angled press brake had inadequate point of operation guarding on the back side of the punch press exposing employees to struck by hazards.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $4900
- — Z (S) $7000
1910.1030 F01 I
- Issued
- May 2, 2013
- Abate by
- May 29, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1030(f)(1)(i): The employer did not make available the hepatitis B vaccine and vaccination series to all employees who have occupational exposure: (a) On or about February 11, 2013; hepatitis B vaccination was not made available to employees who cleaned blood after an accident occurred on the Aida 250 punch press.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (O) $0
1910.1030 G02 I
- Issued
- May 2, 2013
- Abate by
- Jun 19, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1030(g)(2)(i): The employer did not ensure that each employee with occupational exposure participated in a training program: (a) The employer designated first responders, janitors, and two employees for the exposure determination and/or clean up of blood as a result of an accident on or about February 11, 2013. The employer did not provide training to those exposed.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (O) $0
More inspections at Kapco, INC.
View Kapco, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 332116)
More inspections in WI
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 338914542.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.