Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,197,124Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-25 Last loaded 2026-08-28

OSHA Inspection: HALDEMAN FORD

Complaint inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of HALDEMAN FORD in 607 RT 33, HAMILTON SQUARE, NJ 08690 (NAICS 811111). OSHA activity number 338918329.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Haldeman Ford for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Haldeman Ford is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
HALDEMAN FORD
Site address
607 RT 33
City
HAMILTON SQUARE
State
NJ
ZIP
08690
Mailing
607 RT 33, HAMILTON SQUARE, NJ 08690
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
Non-union (B)
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
811111
Employees
74
Ownership type
Private (A)

7 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.157 G02

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 26 exposed
Issued
May 8, 2013
Abate by
Jun 4, 2013
Penalty
Initial $2,100 · Current $1,260 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.157(g)(2):     The educational program to familiarize employees with the general principles of fire extinguisher use and the hazards involved with incipient stage fire fighting was not provided to all employees upon initial employment, and at least annually thereafter:    a) Throughout facility: The employer did provide training to employees on the general principles of fire extinguisher use and the hazards involved with incipient state firefighting initially upon hire and annually thereafter, on or about 2/26/13.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1260
  • · Z (S) $2100

1910.215 A04

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 26 exposed
Issued
May 8, 2013
Abate by
Jun 4, 2013
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $1,680 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.215(a)(4):     Grinding machinery was not used with work rest(s) to support offhand grinding work:    a) Lathe/tire room: A Dayton 6 inch bench grinder, model 2LKR5 lot number 101000665, did not have a work rest, on or about 2/26/13.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1680
  • · Z (S) $2800

1910.215 B09

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 26 exposed
Issued
May 8, 2013
Abate by
Jun 4, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.215(b)(9):   The distance between the abrasive wheel periphery(s) and the adjustable tongue or the end of the safety guard peripheral member at the top exceeded one fourth inch:  a) Lathe/tire room: A Dayton 6 inch bench grinder, model 2LKR5 lot number 101000665, had an opening of more than 1/4 inch between the wheel and the top periphery, on or about 2/26/13.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.134 C02 I

Other-than-serious 1 instance 26 exposed
Issued
May 8, 2013
Abate by
Jun 4, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(2)(i): Respirator users were not provided with the information contained in Appendix D to 29 CFR 1910.134 when the employer determined that any voluntary respirator use was permissible:   a) Service garage: Employees provided filtering facepiece dust masks for voluntary use were not provided with the information contained in Appendix D, on or about 2/26/13.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $0
  • · Z (O) $0

1910.1200 E01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 26 exposed
Issued
May 8, 2013
Abate by
Jun 4, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1):     The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met:      a) Throughout facility: The employer did not develop and implement a written hazard communication progam for the chemicals used by employees, including, but not limited to, brake cleaner, antifreeze, oil, brake fluid, transmission fluid , on or about 2/26/13.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $0
  • · Z (O) $0

1910.1200 G01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 26 exposed
Issued
May 8, 2013
Abate by
Jun 4, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(g)(1):     Employers did not have a safety data sheet in the workplace for each hazardous chemical that was used:      a) Throughout facility: The employer did not maintain material safety data sheets in the facility for the chemicals used by employees, including, but not limited to, brake cleaner, antifreeze, oil, brake fluid, transmission fluid , on or about 2/26/13.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $0
  • · Z (O) $0

1910.1200 H01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 26 exposed
Issued
May 8, 2013
Abate by
Jun 4, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1):     Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area:    a) Throughout facility: Employees have not received training on the chemicals used in the facility, including, but not limited to, brake cleaner, antifreeze, oil, brake fluid, transmission fluid , on or about 2/26/13.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $0
  • · Z (O) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 338918329.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.