Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: ALDO RAMIREZ

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of ALDO RAMIREZ in 1304 TWISTING MEADOWS DRIVE, HASLET, TX 76052 (NAICS 238350). OSHA activity number 338920416.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Aldo Ramirez — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Aldo Ramirez is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
ALDO RAMIREZ
Site address
1304 TWISTING MEADOWS DRIVE
City
HASLET
State
TX
ZIP
76052
Mailing
1532 DOWDY FERRY, DALLAS, TX 75217
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238350
Employees
6
Ownership type
A

8 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.21 B02

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
May 10, 2013
Abate by
May 30, 2013
Penalty
Initial $1,600 · Current $1,600
29 CFR 1926.21(b)(2): The employer shall instruct each employee in the recognition and avoidance of unsafe conditions and the regulations applicable to his work environment to control or eliminate any hazards or other exposure to illness or injury.    On or about February 27, 2012, employees were performing decking work on a steep roof without fall protection and safety glasses while other employees worked below and used circular saws to cut plywood without hard hats or safety glasses and did not recognize the hazards associated with these conditions.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1600
  • — Z (S) $1600

1926.102 A01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
May 10, 2013
Abate by
May 30, 2013
Penalty
Initial $1,600 · Current $1,600
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): Employees shall be provided with eye and face protection equipment when machines or operations present potential eye or face injury from physical, chemical, or radiation agents.   On or about February 27, 2013, the employer did not ensure employees were provided eye protection. Employees without eye protection were cutting wood with an electric circular saw and exposed to eye injuries.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1600
  • — Z (S) $1600

1926.404 F06

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 2 exposed
Issued
May 10, 2013
Abate by
May 30, 2013
Penalty
Initial $1,600 · Current $1,600
29 CFR 1926.404(f)(6): The path to ground from circuits, equipment, and enclosures shall be permanent and continuous.   On or about February 27, 2013, the employer did not ensure electrical equipment used by employees was equipped with a ground. Employees using an electric circular saw connected to a flexible electrical cord with the ground removed were exposed to an electrical shock.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1600
  • — Z (S) $1600

1926.405 G02 IV

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
May 10, 2013
Abate by
May 30, 2013
Penalty
Initial $1,600 · Current $1,600
29 CFR 1926.405(g)(2)(iv): Strain relief. Flexible cords connected to devices and fittings did not have strain relief provided to  prevent pull from being directly transmitted to joints or terminal screws.   On or about February 27, 2013, the employer did not ensure circular saws connected to flexible cords did not have strain relief. Employees using the electric circular saws to cut plywood were exposed to electric shock hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1600
  • — Z (S) $1600

1926.501 B13

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
May 10, 2013
Abate by
May 30, 2013
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $2,800
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13):  Each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels shall be protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system unless another provision in paragraph (b) of this section provides for an alternative fall protection measure.    On or about February 27, 2013, the employer did not ensure employees performing decking work at a height more than 6 feet were protected from falling. The employees were exposed to an unprotected fall to the ground below.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2800
  • — Z (S) $2800

1926.501 C

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
May 10, 2013
Abate by
May 30, 2013
Penalty
Initial $1,600 · Current $1,600
29 CFR 1926.501(c): When an employee is exposed to falling objects, the employer did not have each employee wear a hard hat.     On or about February 27, 2012 the employer did not ensure employees working on the ground were protected by a hard hat while other employees worked above. The employees on the ground were exposed to being struck-by objects falling from a height of over 15 feet.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1600
  • — Z (S) $1600

1926.503 A01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
May 10, 2013
Abate by
May 30, 2013
Penalty
Initial $1,600 · Current $1,600
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1): The employer shall provide a training program for each employee who might be exposed to fall hazards. The program shall enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and shall train each employee in the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards.   On or about February 27, 2012, the employer did not ensure employees exposed to fall hazards were trained to recognize and avoid such hazards. The employees working without fall protection were exposed to an unprotected fall of over 15 feet to the ground below.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1600
  • — Z (S) $1600

1926.1052 C01 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
May 10, 2013
Abate by
May 30, 2013
Penalty
Initial $1,600 · Current $1,600
29 CFR 1926.1052(c)(1)(i):  Stairways having four or more risers or rising more than 30 inches (76 cm), whichever is less, shall be equipped with one handrail.    On or about February 27, 2012, the employer did not ensure the stairs employees were using to access the roof was equipped with one handrail.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1600
  • — Z (S) $1600

View Aldo Ramirez's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 338920416.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.