AUSTIN, TX —
OSHA Inspection: INTERSTATE PLASTICS
Referral inspection · Health discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a referral health inspection of INTERSTATE PLASTICS in 3714 BLUESTEIN DRIVE SUITE 790, AUSTIN, TX 78721 (NAICS 424610). OSHA activity number 338922115.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- INTERSTATE PLASTICS
- Site address
- 3714 BLUESTEIN DRIVE SUITE 790
- City
- AUSTIN
- State
- TX
- ZIP
- 78721
- Mailing
- 3714 BLUESTEIN DRIVE SUITE 790, AUSTIN, TX 78721
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Referral (C)
- Scope
- Complete (A)
- Discipline
- Health
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 424610
- Employees
- 13
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
6 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.37 A03
- Issued
- May 23, 2013
- Abate by
- Jun 7, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $2,100 · Current $1,260 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.37(a)(3): Exit routes were not free and/or unobstructed. No materials or equipment may be placed, either permanently or temporarily, within the exit route. On or about March 3, 2013, the exit near the table saw was obsturcted by pallets and other items exposing employees to trip and fall hazards. Pursuant to 29 C.F.R. 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the date of this citation, the employer must submit documentation showing that it is in compliance with the standard, including describing the steps that it is taking to ensure that each exit is clear of any obstruction to prevent employees from he hazards of trip and falls.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1260
- — Z (S) $2100
1910.132 D01
- Issued
- May 23, 2013
- Abate by
- Jun 7, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $2,100 · Current $1,260 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.132(d)(1): The employer did not assess the workplace to determine if hazards were present, or were likely to be present, which necessitated the use of personal protective equipment: On or about February 26, 2013, the employer did not assess the workplace to ensure the employees were properly issued and/or using personal protective equipment while operating panel and tables saws, forklifts, and lifting heavy materials, exposing employees to the hazard of being struck by falling materials. Pursuant to 29 C.F.R. 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the date of this citation, the employer must submit documentation showing that it is in compliance with the standard, including describing the steps that it is taking to ensure that employees with exposure to potential hazards are issued the proper personal protective equipment while working.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1260
- — Z (S) $2100
1910.136 A
- Issued
- May 23, 2013
- Abate by
- Jun 7, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.136(a): The employer did not ensure that each affected employee uses protective footwear when working in areas where there is a danger of foot injuries due to falling or rolling objects, or objects piercing the sole, and where such employee's feet are exposed to electrical hazards: On or about February 26, 2013, the employer did not ensure that the employees working with and around heavy materials were using safety shoes, exposing the employees to the hazard of being struck by falling materials. Pursuant to 29 C.F.R. 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the date of this citation, the employer must submit documentation showing that it is in compliance with the standard, including describing the steps that it is taking to ensure that the employees are not exposed to injures to their feet while working.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.178 L06
- Issued
- May 23, 2013
- Abate by
- Jun 7, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $1,680 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(6): The employer did not certify that each operator has been trained and evaluated as required by this paragraph (l): On or about February 26, 2013, the employer did not ensure that each of the employees operating the Toyota forklifts were certified before they were required to operate them, exposing the employees to the hazard of being struck by the fork lift. Pursuant to 29 C.F.R. 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the date of this citation, the employer must submit documentation showing that it is in compliance with the standard, including describing the steps that it is taking to ensure that each employee operating a forklift is certified.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1680
- — Z (S) $2800
1910.178 M05 III
- Issued
- May 23, 2013
- Abate by
- Jun 7, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.178(m)(5)(iii): Powered industrial truck(s), with the operator dismounted and within 25 feet of the truck still in his view, did not have the load lowered: On or about February 26, 2013, an employee that was operating the forklift did not lower the load before dismounting to operate the panel saw, exposing employees to the hazard of being struck by the forklift. Pursuant to 29 C.F.R. 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the date of this citation, the employer must submit documentation showing that it is in compliance with the standard, including describing the steps that it is taking to ensure that when forklifts are dismounted, the loads are lowered.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.1200 E01
- Issued
- May 23, 2013
- Abate by
- Jun 7, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $2,100 · Current $1,260 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met: On or about February 26, 2013, the employer did not develop, implement or maintain a written hazard communication program for employees cutting plastics that contain fiber glass, Styrene, and Cadmium, exposing employees to inhalation hazards. Pursuant to 29 C.F.R. 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the date of this citation, the employer must submit documentation showing that it is in compliance with the standard, including describing the steps that it is taking to ensure that a written hazard communication program is developed, implemented, and maintained at the facility.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1260
- — Z (S) $2100
More inspections at Interstate Plastics
View Interstate Plastics's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 424610)
More inspections in TX
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 338922115.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.