Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: INTERIOR CONTRACTORS, INC.

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of INTERIOR CONTRACTORS, INC. in CSI STUDENT HOUSING FALLS AVE., TWIN FALLS, ID 83301 (NAICS 238310). OSHA activity number 338923220.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Interior Contractors, INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Interior Contractors, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
CSI STUDENT HOUSING FALLS AVE.
City
TWIN FALLS
State
ID
ZIP
83301
Mailing
P.O. BOX 573, HAILEY, ID 83333
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238310
Employees
16
Ownership type
A

6 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.134 C01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Apr 18, 2013
Abate by
Aug 5, 2013
Penalty
Initial $400 · Current $400
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1): A written respiratory protection program that included the provisions in 29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1)(i) - (ix) with worksite specific procedures was not established and implemented for required respirator use: (Construction Reference 1926.103):    a) South wing dorm 2nd floor: On February 20, 2013, and times prior thereto, employees were using N-95 respirators while dry sanding joint compound without specific procedures for required respirator use.   Note: Abatement certification is required for this item.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (O) $400

1910.134 D01 III

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Apr 18, 2013
Abate by
Aug 5, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(d)(1)(iii): The employer did not identify and evaluate the respiratory hazard(s) in the workplace; including a reasonable estimate of employee exposures to respiratory hazards and identification of the contaminant's chemical state and physical form: (Construction Reference 1926.103):   a) South wing 2nd floor dorm: On February 20, 2013, and times prior thereto, employees were using N-95 respirators while dry sanding joint compound without a reasonable estimate of exposure to the product.     Note: Abatement certification is required for this item.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.134 E01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Apr 18, 2013
Abate by
Aug 5, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace: (Construction Reference 1926.103):    a) South wing 2nd floor dorm: On February 20, 2013, and times prior thereto, employees were using N-95 respirators without a medical evaluation or being fit tested.      Note: Abatement certification is required for this item
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.134 F01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Apr 18, 2013
Abate by
Aug 5, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(f)(1): The employer did not ensure that employee(s) required to use a tight-fitting facepiece respirator passed the appropriate qualitative fit test (QLFT) or quantitative fit test (QNFT): (Construction Reference 1926.103):  a) South wing 2nd floor dorm: On February 20, 2013, and times prior thereto, employees were using a N-95 respirator without a QLFT or a QNFT.  Note: Abatement certification is required for this item.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.134 K01 I

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Apr 18, 2013
Abate by
Aug 5, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(k)(1)(i): The employer did not ensure that each employee could demonstrate knowledge of why the respirator was necessary and how improper fit, usage, or maintenance could compromise the protective effect of the respirator:  (Construction Reference 1926.103):   a) South wing 2nd floor dorm: On February 20, 2013, and times prior thereto, employees did not have knowledge of why they were using the N-95, and how the proper use and hazards were important to its safe use.    Note: Abatement certification is required for this item.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.1200 H01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Apr 18, 2013
Abate by
Aug 5, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area: (Construction Reference: 1926.59):    a) South wing 2nd floor dorm: On February 20, 2013, and times prior thereto, employees did not know the hazards contained in the dust from the joint compound while dry sanding .    Note: Abatement certification is required for this item.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (O) $0

View Interior Contractors, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 338923220.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.