MACON, GA ·
OSHA Inspection: PANAPRINT, INC.
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of PANAPRINT, INC. in 7979 NE INDUSTRIAL BLVD., MACON, GA 31216 (NAICS 323111). OSHA activity number 338925431.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- PANAPRINT, INC.
- Site address
- 7979 NE INDUSTRIAL BLVD.
- City
- MACON
- State
- GA
- ZIP
- 31216
- Mailing
- 7979 NE INDUSTRIAL BLVD., MACON, GA 31216
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Complete (A)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- Non-union (B)
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 323111
- Employees
- 88
- Ownership type
- Private (A)
Citations
5 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.106 D03 II
- Issued
- May 31, 2013
- Abate by
- Jun 26, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $3,570 · Current $2,142 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.106(d)(3)(ii): Storage cabinet(s) for flammable and combustible liquids were not designed or constructed to meet minimal fire resistance as required: On or about February 28, 2013, employees were exposed to fire hazards when approximately 30 gallons of a class 3 flammable liquid (Nova Pressroom Products) were stored in a retrofitted electrical cabinet.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $2142
- · Z (S) $3570
1910.147 C04 I
- Issued
- May 31, 2013
- Abate by
- Jun 26, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $2,975 · Current $1,785 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(4)(i): Procedures were not developed, documented and utilized for the control of potentially hazardous energy when employees were engaged in activities covered by this section: On or about February 28, 2013, employees were exposed to struck-by hazards when there were deficiencies in the machine specific lockout/tagout procedures: a. There were no machine specific procedures for some equipment such as, but not limited to, the Motivair Corp. chiller located at the entrance to the warehouse area. b. Machine specific procedures did not include a statement of the intended use of the procedure c. Machine specific procedures did not include procedural steps for shutting down, isolating, blocking and securing machines or equipment to control hazardous energy d. Machine specific procedures did not include specific procedural steps for the placement, removal and transfer of lockout devices or tagout devices and the responsibility for them e. Machine specific procedures did not include specific requirements for testing a machine or equipment to determine and verify the effectiveness of lockout devices, tagout devices, and other energy control measures.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1785
- · Z (S) $2975
1910.303 G01 I A
- Issued
- May 31, 2013
- Abate by
- Jun 6, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $1,785 · Current $1,071 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.303(g)(1)(i)(A): For electric equipment operating at 600 volts, nominal, or less to ground, and likely to require examination, adjustment, servicing, or maintenance while energized, the depth of the working space in the direction of access to live parts (as measured from the live parts where they were exposed or from the enclosure front or opening where they were enclosed) was less than indicated in Table S-1 of Subpart S of Part 1910: On or about February 28, 2013, employees were exposed to hazards when the shutoff boxes for the chillers were located behind stored ink cans.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1071
- · Z (S) $1785
1910.146 C02
- Issued
- May 31, 2013
- Abate by
- Jun 26, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.146(c)(2): The employer did not inform exposed employees, by posting danger signs or by any other equally effective means, of the existence and location of and the danger posed by the permit spaces: On or about February 28, 2013, employees were exposed to hazards when the bag houses did not have signs.
Recent events (2)
- · I (O) $0
- · Z (O) $0
1910.178 L04 III
- Issued
- May 31, 2013
- Abate by
- Jun 26, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(4)(iii): An evaluation of each powered industrial truck operator's performance was not being conducted at least once every three years: On or about February 28, 2013, employees were exposed to struck-by hazards when the employer had not had the forklift operators re-evaluated every three years.
Recent events (2)
- · I (O) $0
- · Z (O) $0
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 323111)
More inspections in GA
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 338925431.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.