Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
2,004,209Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-13 Last loaded 2026-07-17

OSHA Inspection: PANAPRINT, INC.

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of PANAPRINT, INC. in 7979 NE INDUSTRIAL BLVD., MACON, GA 31216 (NAICS 323111). OSHA activity number 338925431.

Watch Panaprint, INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Panaprint, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
PANAPRINT, INC.
Site address
7979 NE INDUSTRIAL BLVD.
City
MACON
State
GA
ZIP
31216
Mailing
7979 NE INDUSTRIAL BLVD., MACON, GA 31216
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
323111
Employees
88
Ownership type
A

5 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.106 D03 II

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $3570.00 · Current $2142.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.106(d)(3)(ii): Storage cabinet(s) for flammable and combustible liquids were not designed or constructed to meet minimal fire resistance as required:  On or about February 28, 2013, employees were exposed to fire hazards when approximately 30 gallons of a class 3 flammable liquid (Nova Pressroom Products) were stored in a retrofitted electrical cabinet.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2142
  • — Z (S) $3570

1910.147 C04 I

Serious Gravity 5 5 instances 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $2975.00 · Current $1785.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(4)(i): Procedures were not developed, documented and utilized for the control of potentially hazardous energy when employees were engaged in activities covered by this section:  On or about February 28, 2013, employees were exposed to struck-by hazards when there were deficiencies in the machine specific lockout/tagout procedures:  a.     There were no machine specific procedures for some equipment such as, but not limited to, the Motivair Corp. chiller located at the entrance to the warehouse area.  b.     Machine specific procedures did not include a statement of the intended use of the procedure  c.     Machine specific procedures did not include procedural steps for shutting down, isolating, blocking and securing machines or equipment to control hazardous energy  d.     Machine specific procedures did not include specific procedural steps for the placement, removal and transfer of lockout devices or tagout devices and the responsibility for them  e.     Machine specific procedures did not include specific requirements for testing a machine or equipment to determine and verify the effectiveness of lockout devices, tagout devices, and other energy control measures.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1785
  • — Z (S) $2975

1910.303 G01 I A

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $1785.00 · Current $1071.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.303(g)(1)(i)(A): For electric equipment operating at 600 volts, nominal, or less to ground, and likely to require examination, adjustment, servicing, or maintenance while energized, the depth of the working space in the direction of access to live parts (as measured from the live parts where they were exposed or from the enclosure front or opening where they were enclosed) was less than indicated in Table S-1 of Subpart S of Part 1910:  On or about February 28, 2013, employees were exposed to hazards when the shutoff boxes for the chillers were located behind stored ink cans.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1071
  • — Z (S) $1785

1910.146 C02

Other-than-serious 2 instances 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.146(c)(2): The employer did not inform exposed employees, by posting danger signs or by any other equally effective means, of the existence and location of and the danger posed by the permit spaces:   On or about February 28, 2013, employees were exposed to hazards when the bag houses did not have signs.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.178 L04 III

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(4)(iii): An evaluation of each powered industrial truck operator's performance was not being conducted at least once every three years:  On or about February 28, 2013, employees were exposed to struck-by hazards when the employer had not had the forklift operators re-evaluated every three years.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 338925431.