Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,197,124Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-25 Last loaded 2026-08-28

OSHA Inspection: G3 CONTRACTING

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of G3 CONTRACTING in 12310 NW EXPRESSWAY, PIEDMONT, OK 73078 (NAICS 238130). OSHA activity number 338925464.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch G3 Contracting for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for G3 Contracting is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
G3 CONTRACTING
Site address
12310 NW EXPRESSWAY
City
PIEDMONT
State
OK
ZIP
73078
Mailing
2012 F STREET, ORD, NE 68862
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
Non-union (B)
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238130
Employees
5
Ownership type
Private (A)

4 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.178 L01 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Mar 19, 2013
Abate by
May 3, 2013
Penalty
Initial $1,600 · Current $800 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(1)(i):     The employer did not ensure that each powered industrial truck operator was competent to operate a powered industrial truck safely, as demonstrated by the successful completion of the training and evaluation specified in this paragraph (l):    At the worksite:  On or about February 28, 2013, and at times prior thereto, the employer allowed an employee to operate a rough terrain type forklift without providing the required training and evaluation for powered industrial trucks.  Employees were exposed to fall from heights, caught in between and struck-by hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $800
  • · Z (S) $1600

1926.100 A

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Mar 19, 2013
Abate by
Mar 21, 2013
Penalty
Initial $1,200 · Current $600 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.100(a):     Employees working in areas where there is a possible danger of head injury from impact, or from falling or flying objects, or from electrical shock and burns, were not protected by protective helmets:      At the worksite:  On or about February 28, 2013, and at times prior thereto, the employer did not require the use of head protection while employees were working in an area with overhead hazards present.  Employees were exposed to struck-by hazards from falling and flying objects.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $600
  • · Z (S) $1200

1926.451 A06

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Mar 19, 2013
Abate by
Mar 27, 2013
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $1,400 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.451(a)(6):     Scaffolds were not designed by a qualified person and were not constructed and loaded in accordance with that design:    At the job site, on or about February 28, 2013, and at times prior thereto, the employer allowed employees to use an elevated work platform supported by a rough terrain forklift that was not designed by a qualified person.  Employees were exposed to fall from heights hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1400
  • · Z (S) $2800

1926.451 C02 V

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Mar 19, 2013
Abate by
Mar 27, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.451(c)(2)(v):       Fork-lifts were used to support scaffold platforms while the entire platform was not attached to the forks:    At the worksite:  On or about February 28, 2013, and at times prior thereto, the employer allowed employees to use a rough terrain type forklift to support an elevated work platform without being attached to the forks.  Employees were exposed to the hazard of fall from heights.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 338925464.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.