VIRDEN, IL ·
OSHA Inspection: FREEDOM CHEVROLET, INC.
Complaint inspection · Health discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of FREEDOM CHEVROLET, INC. in 634 S. SPRINGFIELD STREET, VIRDEN, IL 62690 (NAICS 811192). OSHA activity number 338931389.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- FREEDOM CHEVROLET, INC.
- Site address
- 634 S. SPRINGFIELD STREET
- City
- VIRDEN
- State
- IL
- ZIP
- 62690
- Mailing
- 625 S. SPRINGFIELD STREET, VIRDEN, IL 62690
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Health
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 811192
- Employees
- 35
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
8 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.303 B02
- Issued
- Mar 25, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $4,200 · Current $2,100 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.303(b)(2): Listed or labeled electrical equipment was not used or installed in accordance with instructions included in the listing or labeling: Employees performing automotive detailing operations were exposed to electrical shock and the employer did not provide outlets devices with ground fault circuit interruption as referenced in the National Electrical Code, Article 511-10.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $2100
- · Z (S) $4200
1910.305 B01 II
- Issued
- Mar 25, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $1,400 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.305(b)(1)(ii): Unused openings in boxes, cabinets, or fittings were not effectively closed: Employees working in the facility were exposed to electrical shock and the employer failed to ensure unused openings in boxes, cabinets, and fittings were effectively closed.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1400
- · Z (S) $2800
1910.305 E01
- Issued
- Mar 25, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.305(e)(1): Cabinets, cutout boxes, fittings, boxes, and panelboard enclosures in damp or wet locations were not installed to prevent moisture or water from entering and accumulating within the enclosures: Employees working in the facility were exposed to electrical shock and the employer failed to enclose boxes were installed to prevent moisture or water from entering and accumulating within the enclosure.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $2800
1910.334 A02 II
- Issued
- Mar 25, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $4,200 · Current $2,100 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.334(a)(2)(ii): If there is a defect or evidence of damage that might expose an employee to injury, the defective or damaged item was not removed from service, and no employee may use it until repairs and tests necessary to render the equipment safe have been made. Employees performing automotive detailing operations were exposed to electrical shock and the employer did not ensure defective extension cords were removed from service until rendered safe.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $2100
- · Z (S) $4200
1910.1200 E01
- Issued
- Mar 25, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $700 · Current $350 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200 will be met: Employees were exposed to chemical hazards when using auto cleaners and other chemicals. The written hazard communication program did not address all of the requirements of the standard. The written hazard communication program did not include: a. The methods the employer will use to inform employees of the hazards of non-routine tasks the employer assigns employees. b. The methods the employer will use to provide the other employers on-site access to material safety data sheets for each hazardous chemical the employees may be exposed to while working. c. The methods the employer will use to inform the other employers of any precautionary measures that need to be taken to protect employees during the workplace's normal operating conditions and in foreseeable emergencies. d. The methods the employer will use to inform the other employers of the labeling system used in the workplace. e. The methods the employer uses to provide employee information on hazardous chemicals.
Recent events (2)
- · I (O) $350
- · Z (O) $700
1910.1200 F05
- Issued
- Mar 25, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $700 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(f)(5): The employer did not ensure that each container of hazardous chemicals in the workplace was labeled, tagged, or marked with the identity and appropriate hazard warnings regarding the chemicals contained therein: Employees were exposed to chemical hazards when storing in an unlabeled container and the employer did not ensure proper labeling was conducted.
Recent events (2)
- · I (O) $0
- · Z (O) $700
1910.1200 G01
- Issued
- Mar 25, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $700 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(g)(1): The employer did not have a material safety data sheet for each hazardous chemical which they used: Employees were exposed to chemical hazards when Material Safety Data Sheets were not available for the cleaning and detailing chemicals. The Material Safety Data Sheets were not obtained from the manufacturer or importer.
Recent events (2)
- · I (O) $0
- · Z (O) $700
1910.1200 H01
- Issued
- Mar 25, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $700 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard was introduced into their work area: Employees were exposed to cleaning and other chemicals and the employer did not perform training and communicate information to employees to address the chemical hazards.
Recent events (2)
- · I (O) $0
- · Z (O) $700
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 811192)
More inspections in IL
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 338931389.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.