Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,194,531Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-11 Last loaded 2026-08-14

OSHA Inspection: ARMY DIRECTORATE OF FAMILY AND MORALE, WELFARE & RECREATION

Planned inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned health inspection of ARMY DIRECTORATE OF FAMILY AND MORALE, WELFARE & RECREATION in 1010 LEGGETT AVE BOX 339500 MAIL STOP 1AA, JOINT BASE LEWIS MCCHORD, WA 98433 (NAICS 928110). OSHA activity number 338932270.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Army Directorate of Family and Morale, Welfare & Recreation for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Army Directorate of Family and Morale, Welfare & Recreation is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
1010 LEGGETT AVE BOX 339500 MAIL STOP 1AA
City
JOINT BASE LEWIS MCCHORD
State
WA
ZIP
98433
Mailing
1010 LEGGETT AVE BOX 339500 MAIL STOP 1AA, JOINT BASE LEWIS MCCHORD, WA 98433
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
Union (A)
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
928110
Employees
1309
Ownership type
Federal government (D)

5 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.132 D02

Serious Gravity 5 3 instances 6 exposed
Issued
Apr 15, 2013
Abate by
May 31, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.132(d)(2):     The employer did not verify, through a written certification, that the required workplace hazard assessment had been performed:    A)     The employer did not perform a personal portective equipment analysis for employees handling corrosive chemcials in the kitchen and laundry facility of the Child daycare center.    B)      The employer did not perform a written personal protective equipment analysis of the kitchen at the bowling alley.
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.133 A01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Apr 15, 2013
Abate by
May 9, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.133(a)(1):     The employer did not ensure that each affected employee uses appropriate eye or face protection when exposed to eye or face hazards from flying particles, molten metal, liquid chemicals, acids or caustic liquids, chemical gases or vapors, or potentially injurious light radiation:    A)     In the kitchen of the snack bar at the base bowling alley, employees were manually mixing corrosive chemicals into dish water, without proper eye protection.
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.151 C

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 6 exposed
Issued
Apr 15, 2013
Abate by
May 31, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.151(c):     Where employees were exposed to injurious corrosive materials, suitable facilities for quick drenching or flushing of the eyes and body were not provided within the work area for immediate emergency use:    A)     In the kitchen and the laundry room of the child daycare center, employees were manually mixing bleach solutions from concentrate, and there was no emergency eye wash station in the facility.    B)     In the kitchen of the bowling alley's snack bar, employees manually added corrosive degreaser to the dish water and there was no emergency eye wash station in the facility.
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.134 D

Other-than-serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Apr 15, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(d):     Employer did not evaluate respiratory hazard(s) in the workplace, to identify relevant workplace and user factors, and base respirator selections on these factors.    A)     At Keeler swimming pool, employees were using respirators when handling pool chemicals, and the employer had not performed a respirator analysis to make sure employees needed a respirator, or if they had the correct kind.
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (O) $0

1910.1200 F05

Other-than-serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Apr 15, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(f)(5):     The employer did not ensure that each container of hazardous chemicals in the workplace was labeled, tagged, or marked with the identity and appropriate hazard warnings regarding the chemicals contained therein:    A)     in the janitorial closet at the gym, there was a chemical spray bottle that was not labeled as to its contents.
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (O) $0

View Army Directorate of Family and Morale, Welfare & Recreation's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 338932270.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.