Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: SHIELD AIR SOLUTIONS, INC.

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of SHIELD AIR SOLUTIONS, INC. in 3708 GREENHOUSE RD., HOUSTON, TX 77084 (NAICS 333415). OSHA activity number 338933823.

Watch Shield AIR Solutions, INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Shield AIR Solutions, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
3708 GREENHOUSE RD.
City
HOUSTON
State
TX
ZIP
77084
Mailing
3708 GREENHOUSE RD., HOUSTON, TX 77084
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
333415
Employees
150
Ownership type
A

8 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.24 H

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 4 exposed
Issued
Apr 4, 2013
Abate by
Apr 19, 2013
Penalty
Initial $3,600 · Current $1,800 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.24(h): Standard railings were not provided on the open sides of all exposed stairways and stair platforms:    The employer does not provide standard railing on all sides of stairways.    a. This violation was observed on or about March 5, 2013, on the west side of the assembly area where employees were exposed to a fall hazard of approximately 15 feet when using a set of stairs without a midrail installed.    b. This violation was observed on or about March 5, 2013, on the east side of the assembly area where employees were exposed to a fall hazard of approximately 15 feet when using a set of stairs without a midrail installed.    Pursuant to 29 C.F.R. 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation showing that it is in compliance with the standard, including describing the steps that it is taking to ensure that standard railing are provided on the open sides of exposed stairways and platforms.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1800
  • — Z (S) $3600

1910.141 G02

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Apr 4, 2013
Abate by
Apr 19, 2013
Penalty
Initial $4,500 · Current $2,250 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.141(g)(2): Employees were permitted to consume food or beverage in area(s) exposed to toxic materials:    The employer does not prevent employees from consuming food or beverage in areas exposed to toxic materials. This violation occurred on or about March 5, 2013, in the painting area where employees were exposed to a chemical ingestion hazard when preparing food and beverages in an area containing Xylene, Ethylbezene, Methyl Isobutyl Ketone and Silica.     Pursuant to 29 C.F.R. 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation showing that it is in compliance with the standard, including describing the steps that it is taking to ensure that area exposed to toxic materials are not used by employee to consume food or beverages.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2250
  • — Z (S) $4500

1910.212 A03 II

Serious Gravity 10 3 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Apr 4, 2013
Abate by
Jun 28, 2013
Penalty
Initial $6,300 · Current $3,150 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(3)(ii): Point(s) of operation of machinery were not guarded to prevent employee(s) from having any part of their body in the danger zone(s) during operating cycle(s):    The employer does not guard the point of operation of machines whose operation exposes an employee to injury.    a. This violation was observed on or about March 5, 2013, in the fabrication shop where employees were exposed to a struck-by hazard when operating a Dumas press brake Model E37160 S/N 7534061928-E without a point of operation guard.     b. This violation was observed on or about March 5, 2013, in the fabrication shop where employees were exposed to a struck-by hazard when operating a Heim press brake Model 45-6 S/N 2445 without a point of operation guard.     c. This violation was observed on or about March 5, 2013, in the fabrication shop where employees were exposed to a struck-by hazard when operating a Chicago Dreis & Krump press brake Model SS-501 S/N 5295 without a point of operation guard.     Pursuant to 29 C.F.R. 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation showing that it is in compliance with the standard, including describing the steps that it is taking to ensure that guards are installed on all machines to protect employees from the point of operation.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $3150
  • — Z (S) $6300

1910.215 A04

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Apr 4, 2013
Abate by
Apr 19, 2013
Penalty
Initial $6,300 · Current $3,150 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.215(a)(4): Grinding machinery was not used with work rest(s) to support offhand grinding work:    The employer does not ensure grinding machinery is used with work rests. This violation was observed on or about March 5, 2013, in the NE section of the assembly area where employees were exposed to a struck-by hazard when operating a Dayton bench grinder without work rests installed.    Pursuant to 29 C.F.R. 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation showing that it is in compliance with the standard, including describing the steps that it is taking to ensure that work rests on grinding machinery are used to support offhand grinding work.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $3150
  • — Z (S) $6300

1910.215 B09

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Apr 4, 2013
Abate by
Apr 19, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.215(b)(9): The distance between the abrasive wheel periphery(s) and the adjustable tongue or the end of the safety guard peripheral member at the top exceeded one fourth inch:    The employer does not adjust tongue guards on grinding machinery to a maximum opening of one fourth inch. This violation occurred on or about March 5, 2013, in the NE corner of the Assembly Shop where employees were exposed to a struck-by hazard when operating a Dayton bench grinder with the tongue guard adjusted to approximately 1 inch.     Pursuant to 29 C.F.R. 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation showing that it is in compliance with the standard, including describing the steps that it is taking to ensure that tongue guards on grinding machinery are adjusted closely to the wheel with a maximum opening of one fourth inch.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.243 C03

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Apr 4, 2013
Abate by
Apr 19, 2013
Penalty
Initial $5,400 · Current $2,700 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.243(c)(3): Abrasive wheels used on vertical portable grinder(s) (right angle head grinders) were not provided with safety guard(s) having a maximum exposure angle of 180 degrees and located between the operator and wheel:    The employer does not provide safety guards on abrasive wheels of portable grinders. This violation was observed on or about March 5, 2013, in the fabrication shop where employees were exposed to a struck-by hazard while operating a Dewalt portable grinder, Model# GA7011C without a safety guard.      Pursuant to 29 C.F.R. 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation showing that it is in compliance with the standard, including describing the steps that it is taking to ensure that abrasive wheels used on vertical portable grinder are provided with safety guard(s) having a maximum exposure angle of 180 degrees and located between the operator and wheel.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2700
  • — Z (S) $5400

1910.303 B02

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Apr 4, 2013
Abate by
Apr 19, 2013
Penalty
Initial $6,300 · Current $3,150 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.303(b)(2): Listed or labeled electrical equipment was not used or installed in accordance with instructions included in the listing or labeling:    The employer does not ensure that listed and labeled equipment are installed in accordance with instructions. This violation was observed on March 5, 2013, on the south side of the Fabrication Shop where an employee was exposed to an electrical shock hazard when using a metal work bench with a metal electrical wall outlet box welded to the frame.     Pursuant to 29 C.F.R. 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation showing that it is in compliance with the standard, including describing the steps that it is taking to ensure that listed and labeled electrical equipment is used and installed in accordance with instructions included in the listing and labeling.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $3150
  • — Z (S) $6300

1910.305 G02 II

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Apr 4, 2013
Abate by
Apr 19, 2013
Penalty
Initial $4,500 · Current $2,250 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.305(g)(2)(ii): Flexible cords were not used only in continuous lengths without splice or tap:    The employer does not ensure that flexible cords are used in continuous lengths without splice. This violation was observed on or about March 5, 2013, in the Assembly area on the NE wall where an employee was operating a DeWalt buffer plugged into a power strip with a splice at the upper end.     Pursuant to 29 C.F.R. 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation showing that it is in compliance with the standard, including describing the steps that it is taking to ensure that flexible cords are used only in continuous lengths without splice or tap.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2250
  • — Z (S) $4500

View Shield AIR Solutions, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 338933823.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.