MOBILE, AL —
OSHA Inspection: ALAFAB, INC
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of ALAFAB, INC in 770 PIERCE RD., MOBILE, AL 36608 (NAICS 332312). OSHA activity number 338934094.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- ALAFAB, INC
- Site address
- 770 PIERCE RD.
- City
- MOBILE
- State
- AL
- ZIP
- 36608
- Mailing
- 770 PIERCE RD., MOBILE, AL 36608
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Complete (A)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 332312
- Employees
- 62
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
9 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.23 D01 II
- Issued
- Apr 11, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $1,785 · Current $1,071 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.23(d)(1)(ii): Stairway(s) less than 44 inches wide having one side open, did not have at least one stair railing on the open side: a) On or about March 7, 2013 and times prior at the vertical boaring machine: The employer failed to ensure the stairs havng four risers were installed with standard stair railings which exposed employees to falls.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1071
- — Z (S) $1785
1910.38 B
- Issued
- Apr 11, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $1,785 · Current $1,071 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.38(b): An emergency action plan was not in writing, kept in the workplace, and available to employees for review: a) On or about March 7, 2013 and times prior, emergency evacuation plan: The employer failed to ensure an emergency action plan was developed to cover emergencies such as but not limited to fires, severe weather, power outage, and chemical spills from surrounding area.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1071
- — Z (S) $1785
1910.157 G02
- Issued
- Apr 11, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $2,380 · Current $1,428 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.157(g)(2): The educational program to familiarize employees with the general principles of fire extinguisher use and the hazards involved with incipient stage fire fighting was not provided to all employees upon initial employment, and at least annually thereafter: a) On or about March 7, 2013 and times prior, fire extinguisher training: The employer failed to ensure all employees were trained on the use of fire extinguishers upon hire and yearly thereafter since all employees are required to use fire extinguishers.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1428
- — Z (S) $2380
1910.184 C06
- Issued
- Apr 11, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $2,380 · Current $1,428 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.184(c)(6): Slings were not securely attached to their loads: a) On or about March 7, 2013 in the fabrication shop: The employer failed to ensure employees used the proper lifting attachment to lift steel sheets. Alloy steel chain slings without safety latches were used on the edges of the steel sheets without pad-eyes or holes to secure the hooks instead of using camlock clamps.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1428
- — Z (S) $2380
1910.212 A01
- Issued
- Apr 11, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $3,500 · Current $2,100 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1): Types of guarding. One or more methods of machine guarding shall be provided to protect the operator and other employees in the machine area from hazards such as those created by point of operation, ingoing nip points, rotating parts, flying chips and sparks. Examples of guarding methods are-barrier guards, two-hand tripping devices,electronic safety devices, etc. a) On or about March 7, 2013 and times prior in the fabrication shop: The employer failed to ensure the unused portion of the HYD-MECH model S-20 horizontal band saw blade was guarded to protect employees from inadvertent contact. b) On or about March 7, 2013 and times prior in the machine shop: The employer failed to ensure the Collet horizontal boaring machine was guarded at the point of operation to prevent metal savings from being thrown toward the employee. c) On or about March 7, 2013 and times prior in the machine shop: The employer failed to ensure the LaGun milling machine was guarded at the point of operation to prevent metal savings from being thrown toward the employee. d) On or about March 7, 2013 and times prior in the machine shop: The employer failed to ensure the Bullard Vertical Turret Lathe was guarded at the point of operation to prevent metal savings from being thrown toward the employee.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2100
- — Z (S) $3500
1910.219 B02
- Issued
- Apr 11, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $2,380 · Current $1,428 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.219(c)(4)(i): Unguarded projecting shaft end(s) did not present a smooth edge and the end projected more than one half the diameter of the shaft: a) On or about March 7, 2013 and times prior, the horizontal lathe machine: The employer failed to ensure the cooling pump shaft end was guarded to protect employees walking past it from inadvertent contact.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1428
- — Z (S) $2380
1904.29 B03
- Issued
- Apr 11, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1904.29(b)(3): 29 CFR 1904.29(b)(3): The employer did not enter the number of days away, job transfer or restriction on the OSHA 300 log within 7 calendar days of receiving information: a) On or about March 7, 2013 and times prior, recordable cases not logged on OSHA 300: The employer failed to ensure an employee who had a lost time injury (58 days) on September 24, 2012 was recorded on the OSHA 300 log within 7 days of the injury. b) On or about March 7, 2013 and times prior, recordable cases not logged on OSHA 300: The employer failed to ensure an employee who had a lost time injury (5 days) on September 28, 2012 was recorded on the OSHA 300 log within 7 days of the injury.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (O) $0
1904.32 B06
- Issued
- Apr 11, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $595 · Current $374 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1904.32(b)(6): 29 CFR 1904.32(b)(6): The Summary of Work-Related Injuries and Illnesses (OSHA Form 300A or equivalent) for the previous year was not posted between February 1 and April 30: a) On or about March 7, 2013 and times prior, posting of the 300A: The employer failed to ensure the 300A or equivalent form was posted for 2012 by February 1, 2013 and kept posted until April 30, 2013 in a common place for employees to review.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $374
- — Z (O) $595
1910.1200 E01
- Issued
- Apr 11, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met: a) On or about March 7, 2013 and times prior, hazard comminucation program: The employer failed to ensure a written hazard communication program was developed and maintained at the workplace.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (O) $0
More inspections at Alafab, INC
View Alafab, INC's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 332312)
More inspections in AL
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 338934094.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.