PROVIDENCE, RI —
OSHA Inspection: MONARCH METAL FINISHING CO., INC.
Complaint inspection · Health discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of MONARCH METAL FINISHING CO., INC. in 189 GEORGIA AVENUE, PROVIDENCE, RI 02903 (NAICS 332813). OSHA activity number 338936727.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- MONARCH METAL FINISHING CO., INC.
- Site address
- 189 GEORGIA AVENUE
- City
- PROVIDENCE
- State
- RI
- ZIP
- 02903
- Mailing
- 189 GEORGIA AVENUE, PROVIDENCE, RI 02903
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Health
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 332813
- Employees
- 51
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
19 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.95 B01
- Issued
- Aug 29, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $4,410 · Current $2,205 Reduced
81108111
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.95(b)(1): When employees are subjected to sound exceeding those listed in Table G-16, feasible administrative or engineering controls shall be utilized. If such controls fail to reduce sound levels within the levels of Table G-16, personal protective equipment shall be provided and used to reduce sound levels within the levels of the table: Vibratory Area, Shakeout machines: Employees (Finishers) working in the Vibratory Area were subjected to sound levels exceeding those listed 29 CFR 1910.95, Table G-16: 1) On 03/13/2013 a Finisher performing shakeout tasks in this area was exposed to noise levels in excess of OSHA's permissible exposure limit of 90 dBA for an eight-hour time weighted average. This employee was exposed to noise levels of 94 dBA for 383 minutes. This represents a dose of 180 percent of the allowable eight-hour time-weighted average of 90 dBA. Zero exposure was assumed for any unsampled time; 2) On 03/13/2013 a Finsher performing shakeout tasks in this area was exposed to noise levels in excess of OSHA's permissible exposure limit of 90 decibels for an eight-hour time-weighted average. This employee was exposed to noise levels in excess of 93.4 dBA for 384 minutes. This represents a dose of 163 percent of the allowable eight-hour time-weighted average of 90 dBA. Zero exposure was assumed for any unsampled time; 3) On 03/13/2013 a Finisher performing shakeout tasks in this area was exposed to noise levels in excess of OSHA's Action Level of 85 dBA for an eight hour time-weighted average This employee was exposed to noise levels in excess of 91 dBA for 383 minutes. This represents a dose of 119 percent of the allowable eight-hour time-weighted Action Level of 85 dBA. Zero exposure was assumed for any unsampled time; 4) On 03/13/2013 a Finisher performing shakeout tasks in this area was exposed to noise levels in excess of OSHA's Action Level of 85 dBA for an eight-hour time-weighted average. This employee was exposed to noise levels in excess of 88 dBA for 388 minutes. This represents a dose of 123 percent of the allowable eight-hour time-weighted Action Level of 85 dBA. Zero exposure was assumed for any unsampled time.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2205
- — Z (S) $4410
1910.95 C01
- Issued
- Aug 29, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
81108111
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.95(c)(1): The employer shall administer a continuing, effective hearing conservation program, as described in paragraphs (c) through (o) of this section, whenever employee noise exposures equal or exceed an 8-hour time-weighted average sound level (TWA) of 85 decibels measured on the A scale (slow response) or, equivalently, a dose of fifty percent. For purposes of the hearing conservation program, employee noise exposures shall be computed in accordance with appendix A and Table G-16a, and without regard to any attenuation provided by the use of personal protective equipment.: Vibratory Area, Shakeout machines: Employees (Finishers) working in the Vibratory Area were subjected to sound levels exceeding those listed 29 CFR 1910.95, Table G-16: 1) On 03/13/2013 a Finisher performing shakeout tasks in this area was exposed to noise levels in excess of OSHA's permissible exposure limit of 90 dBA for an eight-hour time weighted average. This employee was exposed to noise levels of 94 dBA for 383 minutes. This represents a dose of 180 percent of the allowable eight-hour time-weighted average of 90 dBA. Zero exposure was assumed for any unsampled time; 2) On 03/13/2013 a Finsher performing shakeout tasks in this area was exposed to noise levels in excess of OSHA's permissible exposure limit of 90 decibels for an eight-hour time-weighted average. This employee was exposed to noise levels in excess of 93.4 dBA for 384 minutes. This represents a dose of 163 percent of the allowable eight-hour time-weighted average of 90 dBA. Zero exposure was assumed for any unsampled time; 3) On 03/13/2013 a Finisher performing shakeout tasks in this area was exposed to noise levels in excess of OSHA's Action Level of 85 dBA for an eight hour time-weighted average. This employee was exposed to noise levels in excess of 91 dBA for 383 minutes. This represents a dose of 119 percent of the allowable eight-hour time-weighted Action Level of 85 dBA. Zero exposure was assumed for any unsampled time; 4) On 03/13/2013 a Finisher performing shakeout tasks in this area was exposed to noise levels in excess of OSHA's Action Level of 85 dBA for an eight-hour time-weighted average. This employee was exposed to noise levels in excess of 88 dBA for 388 minutes. This represents a dose of 123 percent of the allowable eight-hour time-weighted Action Level of 85 dBA. Zero exposure was assumed for any unsampled time.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.95 K01
- Issued
- Aug 29, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $3,150 · Current $1,575 Reduced
81108111
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.95(k)(1): The employer shall train each employee who is exposed to noise at or above an 8-hour time weighted average of 85 decibels in accordance with the requirements of this section. The employer shall institute a training program and ensure employee participation in the program: Vibratory Area, Shakeout machines: Employees (Finishers) working in the Vibratory Area were subjected to sound levels exceeding those listed 29 CFR 1910.95, Table G-16: 1) On 03/13/2013 a Finisher performing shakeout tasks in this area was exposed to noise levels in excess of OSHA's permissible exposure limit of 90 dBA for an eight-hour time weighted average. This employee was exposed to noise levels of 94 dBA for 383 minutes. This represents a dose of 180 percent of the allowable eight-hour time-weighted average of 90 dBA. Zero exposure was assumed for any unsampled time; 2) On 03/13/2013 a Finsher performing shakeout tasks in this area was exposed to noise levels in excess of OSHA's permissible exposure limit of 90 decibels for an eight-hour time-weighted average. This employee was exposed to noise levels in excess of 93.4 dBA for 384 minutes. This represents a dose of 163 percent of the allowable eight-hour time-weighted average of 90 dBA. Zero exposure was assumed for any unsampled time; 3) On 03/13/2013 a Finisher performing shakeout tasks in this area was exposed to noise levels in excess of OSHA's Action Level of 85 dBA for an eight hour time-weighted average This employee was exposed to noise levels in excess of 91 dBA for 383 minutes. This represents a dose of 119 percent of the allowable eight-hour time-weighted Action Level of 85 dBA. Zero exposure was assumed for any unsampled time; 4) On 03/13/2013 a Finisher performing shakeout tasks in this area was exposed to noise levels in excess of OSHA's Action Level of 85 dBA for an eight-hour time-weighted average. This employee was exposed to noise levels in excess of 88 dBA for 388 minutes. This represents a dose of 123 percent of the allowable eight-hour time-weighted Action Level of 85 dBA. Zero exposure was assumed for any unsampled time.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1575
- — Z (S) $3150
1910.106 D04 I
- Issued
- Aug 29, 2013
- Abate by
- Oct 3, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $2,520 · Current $1,260 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.106(d)(4)(i): Inside storage rooms were not constructed to meet the required fire-resistive rating for their use. Such construction shall comply with the test specifications set forth in Standard Methods of Fire Tests of Building Construction and Materials, NFPA 251-1969. Where an automatic sprinkler system is provided, the system shall be designed and installed in an acceptable manner. Openings to other rooms or buildings shall be provided with noncombustible liquid-tight raised sills or ramps at least 4 inches in height, or the floor in the storage area shall be at least 4 inches below the surrounding floor. Openings shall be provided with approved self-closing fire doors. The room shall be liquid-tight where the walls join the floor. A permissible alternate to the sill or ramp is an open-grated trench inside of the room which drains to a safe location. Where other portions of the building or other properties are exposed, windows shall be protected as set forth in the Standard for Fire Doors and Windows, NFPA No. 80-1968, which is incorporated by reference as specified in Sec. 1910.6, for Class E or F openings. Wood at least 1 inch nominal thickness may be used for shelving, racks, dunnage, scuffboards, floor overlay, and similar installations: Facility: In the following instances, the employer did not construct inside flammable storage rooms to meet the required fire-resistive rating for their use: (1) The opening of the flammable storage room was not equipped with a self-closing fire door; (2) Wood used for all shelving was not at least 1-inch nominal thickness.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1260
- — Z (S) $2520
1910.106 D04 IV
- Issued
- Aug 29, 2013
- Abate by
- Oct 3, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.106(d)(4)(iv): Every inside storage room was not provided with either a gravity or a mechanical exhaust ventilation system to provide for a complete change of air within the room at least six times per hour. If a mechanical exhaust system is used, it shall be controlled by a switch located outside of the door. The ventilating equipment and any lighting fixtures shall be operated by the same switch. A pilot light shall be installed adjacent to the switch if Category 1 or 2 flammable liquids, or Category 3 flammable liquids with a flashpoint below 100 °F (37.8 °C), are dispensed within the room: Inside Flammable Storage Room: When the employer provided a mechanical exhaust ventilation system in the inside Flammable Storage Room, the employer did not ensure that: (1) the ventilation system provided for a complete change of air within the room at least six (6) times per hour; (2) the mechanical ventilation system was controlled by a switch located outside the door; (3) a pilot light was installed adjacent to the switch when Class 1 liquids are dispensed inside the room.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.107 G03
- Issued
- Aug 29, 2013
- Abate by
- Sep 10, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $1,890 · Current $945 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.107(g)(3): Residue scrapings and debris contaminated with residue shall be immediately removed from the premises and properly disposed of. Approved metal waste cans shall be provided wherever rags or waste are impregnated with finishing material and all such rags or waste deposited therein immediately after use. The contents of waste cans shall be properly disposed of at least once daily or at the end of each shift: Lacquer Room, Spray Booth: The employer used combustible cardboard to line the interior of the spray booth and collect combustible overspray from lacquer spraying operations. This cardboard was not changed frequently, and this allowed the build-up of combustible overspray residue inside the booth.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $945
- — Z (S) $1890
1910.120 Q01
- Issued
- Aug 29, 2013
- Abate by
- Oct 16, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $2,520 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.120(q)(1): An emergency response plan shall be developed and implemented to handle anticipated emergencies prior to the commencement of emergency response operations. The plan shall be in writing and available for inspection and copying by employees, their representatives and OSHA personnel. Employers who will evacuate their employees from the danger area when an emergency occurs, and who do not permit any of their employees to assist in handling the emergency, are exempt from the requirements of this paragraph if they provide an emergency action plan in accordance with 29 CFR 1910.38: Facility: For employees who would respond to, and clean up, uncontrolled releases of hazardous chemicals, the employer did not develop and implement a written emergency response plan. These chemicals include, but are not limited to, Sulfuric Acid, Hydrochloric Acid, Sodium Cyanide, and Zinc Cyanide.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $2520
1910.132 A
- Issued
- Aug 29, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $2,520 · Current $1,260 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.132(a): Protective equipment, including personal protective equipment for eyes, face, head, and extremities, protective clothing, respiratory devices, and protective shields and barriers, shall be provided, used, and maintained in a sanitary and reliable condition wherever it is necessary by reason of hazards of processes or environment, chemical hazards, radiological hazards, or mechanical irritants encountered in a manner capable of causing injury or impairment in the function of any part of the body through absorption, inhalation or physical contact: Worksite: The employer did not provide, and enforce usage of, personal protective equipment for employees exposed to eye, face, and skin hazards.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1260
- — Z (S) $2520
1910.133 A01
- Issued
- Aug 29, 2013
- Abate by
- Sep 17, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.133(a)(1): The employer shall ensure that each affected employee uses appropriate eye or face protection when exposed to eye or face hazards from flying particles, molten metal, liquid chemicals, acids or caustic liquids, chemical gases or vapors, or potentially injurious light radiation: Facility: Employees who use highly corrosive acids, bases, cyanides, and solvents did not ensure that exposed employees wore adequate personl protective equipment.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.134 C01
- Issued
- Aug 29, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $1,890 · Current $945 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1): In any workplace where respirators are necessary to protect the health of the employee or whenever respirators are required by the employer, the employer shall establish and implement a written respiratory protection program with worksite-specific procedures. The program shall be updated as necessary to reflect those changes in workplace conditions that affect respirator use: Facility: For employees who wear half-mask elastomeric respirators, the employer did not develop and implement a written respiratory protection plan with worksite-specific procedures for employee use.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $945
- — Z (S) $1890
1910.134 E01
- Issued
- Aug 29, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $1,890 · Current $945 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): General. The employer shall provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee is fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace: Facility: The employer did not provide medical evaluations for employees who wear half-mask elastomeric respirators in the performance of workplace duties.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $945
- — Z (S) $1890
1910.151 B
- Issued
- Aug 29, 2013
- Abate by
- Oct 3, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $2,520 · Current $1,260 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.151(b): In the absence of an infirmary, clinic, or hospital in near proximity to the workplace which is used for the treatment of all injured employees, a person or persons were not adequately trained to render first aid. Adequate first aid supplies were not readily available: Facility: When cyanide compounds were during plating operations, the employer did not have ready a first aid kit specifically stocked with antidotes to counter the effects of an accidental cyanide poisoning.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1260
- — Z (S) $2520
1910.157 C01
- Issued
- Aug 29, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $1,890 · Current $945 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.157(c)(1): The employer did not provide portable fire extinguishers and did not mount, locate and identify them so that they are readily accessible to employees without subjecting the employees to possible injury: Flammable Spray Area: Employer did not mount, locate and identify fire extinguishers so that they were readily accessible to employees in the event of an emergency. Portable fire extinguishers were allowed to be obstructed by hanging coats, jackets, and other apparel.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $945
- — Z (S) $1890
1910.178 L01 I
- Issued
- Aug 29, 2013
- Abate by
- Oct 16, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $2,520 · Current $1,260 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(1)(i): The employer shall ensure that each powered industrial truck operator is competent to operate a powered industrial truck safely, as demonstrated by the successful completion of the training and evaluation specified in this paragraph (l): Facility: The employer did not ensure that employees who operated powered industrial trucks successfully completed a program of training and evaluation as specified in 29 CFR 1910.178(l)(2)(i) through (iii), (l)(3)(i) through (iii), and (l)(4)(i) through (iii).
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1260
- — Z (S) $2520
1910.303 G01 I A
- Issued
- Aug 29, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $1,890 · Current $945 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.303(g)(1)(i)(A): The depth of the working space in the direction of access to live parts may not be less than indicated in Table S-1. Distances shall be measured from the live parts if they are exposed or from the enclosure front or opening if they are enclosed: In the following locations, the employer did not ensure that access to live parts in the event of an emergency was at least 3 feet in all directions: 1) Cyanide Area, 2) Buffing Area.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $945
- — Z (S) $1890
1910.1200 E01
- Issued
- Aug 29, 2013
- Abate by
- Oct 3, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $3,780 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): Employers shall develop, implement, and maintain at each workplace, a written hazard communication program which at least describes how the criteria specified in paragraphs (f), (g), and (h) of this section for labels and other forms of warning, material safety data sheets, and employee information and training will be met: Facility: The employer did not develop and implement a written hazard communication program when employees were handling, and exposed to, hazardous acids, bases, cyanides, and spraying flammable laquers, thinners, and solvents.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $3780
1910.1200 H01
- Issued
- Aug 29, 2013
- Abate by
- Oct 3, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): Employers did not provide employees with effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment, and whenever a new physical or health hazard the employees have not previously been trained about is introduced into their work area: Facility: When employees handled, and were exposed to, hazardous acid, bases, cyanide, and plating compounds, the employer did not conduct hazard communication training as required under 29 CFR 1910 1200(h)(2)(i),through (iii), and 1200(h)(3)(i) through (iv).
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.1200 F05
- Issued
- Aug 29, 2013
- Abate by
- Oct 3, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $2,520 · Current $1,260 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(f)(5): Except as provided in paragraphs (f)(6) and (f)(7) of this section, the employer shall ensure that each container of hazardous chemicals in the workplace is labeled, tagged or marked with the following information: Identity of the hazardous chemical(s) contained therein; and, Appropriate hazard warnings, or alternatively, words, pictures, symbols, or combination thereof, which provide at least general information regarding the hazards of the chemicals, and which, in conjunction with the other information immediately available to employees under the hazard communication program, will provide employees with the specific information regarding the physical and health hazards of the hazardous chemical.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1260
- — Z (S) $2520
1904.1 A02
- Issued
- Aug 29, 2013
- Abate by
- Oct 16, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $630 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1904.1(a)(2): If your company had more than ten (10) employees at any time during the last calendar year, you must keep OSHA injury and illness records unless your establishment is classified as a partially exempt industry under �� 1904.2: Facility: The employer did not develop and maintain OSHA 300 injury and illness records during the time in business.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (O) $630
More inspections at Monarch Metal Finishing CO., INC.
View Monarch Metal Finishing CO., INC.'s full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 332813)
More inspections in RI
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 338936727.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.