Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: A & E POWDER COATING LLC

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of A & E POWDER COATING LLC in 1511 SHERIDAN AVENUE, SPRINGFIELD, OH 45505 (NAICS 332812). OSHA activity number 338940620.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch A & E Powder Coating LLC — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for A & E Powder Coating LLC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
1511 SHERIDAN AVENUE
City
SPRINGFIELD
State
OH
ZIP
45505
Mailing
1151 SHERIDAN AVENUE, SPRINGFIELD, OH 45505
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
332812
Employees
26
Ownership type
A

9 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.242 B

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Apr 16, 2013
Abate by
May 3, 2013
Penalty
Initial $2,100 · Current $750 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.242(b):     Compressed air used for cleaning. Compressed air shall not be used for cleaning purposes except where reduced to less than 30 p.s.i. and then only with effective chip guarding and personal protective equipment.    In the Production Area, on Paint Line #2, a painter was using compressed air for cleaning the tip of the powder coat paint gun and when the nozzle was deadended it measured 70 psi.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $750
  • — C (S) $2100
  • — Z (S) $2100

1910.304 G05

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Apr 16, 2013
Abate by
Apr 26, 2013
Penalty
Initial $2,100 · Current $750 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.304(g)(5):     Grounding path. The path to ground from circuits, equipment, and enclosures shall be permanent, continuous, and effective.    On Production Area, on Paint Line #1, a packer was using a Better Pack 500 tape machine to tape boxes and the 110 Volt AC power cord plug was missing its ground pin.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $750
  • — C (S) $2100
  • — Z (S) $2100

1910.132 D02

Other-than-serious 1 instance 12 exposed
Issued
Apr 16, 2013
Abate by
May 3, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.132(d)(2):     The employer shall verify that the required workplace hazard assessment has been performed through a written certification that identifies the workplace evaluated; the person certifying that the evaluation has been performed; the date(s) of the hazard assessment; and, which identifies the document as a certification of hazard assessment.    The Company had not performed a written certification that identifies the workplace evaluated and the person certifying that the evaluation has been performed.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (O) $0
  • — C (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.134 C01

Deleted Other-than-serious 1 instance 8 exposed
Issued
Apr 16, 2013
Abate by
Jun 3, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1):   In any workplace where respirators are necessary to protect the health of the employee or whenever respirators are required by the employer, the employer shall establish and implement a written respiratory protection program with worksite-specific procedures. The program shall be updated as necessary to reflect those changes in workplace conditions that affect respirator use. The employer shall include in the program the following provisions of this section, as applicable:  The Company required painters to wear the N95 filtering facepiece respirators when powder coating on Line 1 and 2 and did not have a written respiratory protection program.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (O) $0
  • — C (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.134 E01

Deleted Other-than-serious 1 instance 8 exposed
Issued
Apr 16, 2013
Abate by
Jun 3, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1):     General. The employer shall provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee is fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace. The employer may discontinue an employee's medical evaluations when the employee is no longer required to use a respirator.    The Company did not provide a medical evaluation to employees using a N95 filtering facepiece respirator while powder coating on Lines 1 and 2.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (O) $0
  • — C (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.134 F01

Deleted Other-than-serious 1 instance 8 exposed
Issued
Apr 16, 2013
Abate by
Jun 3, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(f)(1):     The employer shall ensure that employees using a tight-fitting facepiece respirator pass an appropriate qualitative fit test (QLFT) or quantitative fit test (QNFT) as stated in this paragraph.    Painters wearing a N95 filtering facepiece respirator when powder coating on Lines 1 and 2 had not been fit tested before being allowed to wear the respirator.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (O) $0
  • — C (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.134 K

Deleted Other-than-serious 1 instance 8 exposed
Issued
Apr 16, 2013
Abate by
Jun 3, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(k):     Training and information. This paragraph requires the employer to provide effective training to employees who are required to use respirators. The training must be comprehensive, understandable, and recur annually, and more often if necessary. This paragraph also requires the employer to provide the basic information on respirators in Appendix D of this section to employees who wear respirators when not required by this section or by the employer to do so.    Employees who are required to wear N95 filtering facepiece respirators when powder coating on Lines 1 and 2 had not had training on the proper use of respirators.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (O) $0
  • — C (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.178 L04 III

Other-than-serious 1 instance 8 exposed
Issued
Apr 16, 2013
Abate by
May 3, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(4)(iii):     An evaluation of each powered industrial truck operator's performance shall be conducted at least once every three years.    Forklift operators who received initial training in September 2009 did not receive an evaluation of the performance once every three years.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (O) $0
  • — C (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.1200 E01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 8 exposed
Issued
Apr 16, 2013
Abate by
Jun 3, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1):     Employers shall develop, implement, and maintain at each workplace, a written hazard communication program which at least describes how the criteria specified in paragraphs (f), (g), and (h) of this section for labels and other forms of warning, material safety data sheets, and employee information and training will be met, and which also includes the following:    The employer had not developed and implemented a written hazard communication program for hazardous chemicals and materials used by employees in the facility.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (O) $0
  • — C (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 338940620.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.