Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: FERGUSON WATERWORKS

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of FERGUSON WATERWORKS in N49 W22990 COMMERCE CENTRE DRIVE, PEWAUKEE, WI 53072 (NAICS 423720). OSHA activity number 338941735.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Ferguson Waterworks — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Ferguson Waterworks is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
FERGUSON WATERWORKS
Site address
N49 W22990 COMMERCE CENTRE DRIVE
City
PEWAUKEE
State
WI
ZIP
53072
Mailing
N49 W22990 COMMERCE CENTRE DRIVE, PEWAUKEE, WI 53072
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
423720
Employees
12
Ownership type
A

2 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.176 A

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Apr 24, 2013
Abate by
May 6, 2013
Penalty
Initial $3,400 · Current $2,380 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.176(a):   Aisle(s) and passageway(s) were not kept clear and in good repair with no obstruction across or in aisles that could create a hazard.  (a)  In the material storage yard, the employer did not ensure that aisles and passageways were free from snow and/or ice accumulations. Powered industrial vehicles, such as but not limited to the Toyota, Mitsubishi, or Hyster, were getting stuck or sliding on snow and/or ice.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2380
  • — Z (S) $3400

1910.132 D01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Apr 24, 2013
Abate by
May 20, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.132(d)(1): The employer did not assess the workplace to determine if hazards are present, or are likely to be present, which necessitate the use of personal protective equipment (PPE):  (a)  The employer did not perform a certified hazard assessment to determine personal protective equipment requirements. Employees were performing liquid propane gas tank changes on the forklifts, such as but not limited to on the Toyota, Mitsubishi, or Hyster without the use of adequate eye protection.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

View Ferguson Waterworks's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 338941735.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.