CLINTON, CT ·
OSHA Inspection: ARGO TRANSDATA CORPORATION
Complaint inspection · Health discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of ARGO TRANSDATA CORPORATION in 1 HERITAGE PARK RD, CLINTON, CT 06413 (NAICS 334412). OSHA activity number 338944770.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- ARGO TRANSDATA CORPORATION
- Site address
- 1 HERITAGE PARK RD
- City
- CLINTON
- State
- CT
- ZIP
- 06413
- Mailing
- 1 HERITAGE PARK RD, CLINTON, CT 06413
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Health
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- Non-union (B)
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 334412
- Employees
- 25
- Ownership type
- Private (A)
Citations
5 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.132 D01
- Issued
- May 23, 2013
- Abate by
- Jun 5, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $1,600 · Current $1,120 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.132(d)(1): The employer did not assess the workplace to determine if hazards are present, or are likely to be present, which necessitate the use of personal protective equipment (PPE): Facility: The employer did not conduct a site-specific workplace hazard assessment to determine the necessitate and appropriate types of PPE for employees.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1120
- · Z (S) $1600
1910.134 C01
- Issued
- May 23, 2013
- Abate by
- Jun 5, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $1,600 · Current $1,120 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1): A written respiratory protection program that included the provisions in 29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1)(i) - (ix) with worksite specific procedures was not established and implemented for required respirator use: Facility: The employer did not establish and implement a respiratory protection program for employees who were required to wear respirators while working with urethane conformal coating.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1120
- · Z (S) $1600
1910.134 K
- Issued
- May 23, 2013
- Abate by
- Jun 5, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(k): The employer did not provide comprehensive, understandable training which did not occur annually and/or more often if necessary: Facility: The employer did not provide comprehensive training for employees who were required to wear respirators.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
1910.134 E01
- Issued
- May 23, 2013
- Abate by
- Jun 5, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $1,600 · Current $1,120 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace: Facility: The employer did not provide employees with a medical evaluation prior to employee use of a half-facepiece respirator while spraying urethane conformal coating.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1120
- · Z (S) $1600
1910.134 F02
- Issued
- May 23, 2013
- Abate by
- Jun 5, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $1,600 · Current $1,120 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(f)(2): Employee(s) using tight-fitting facepiece respirators were not fit tested prior to initial use of the respirator: Facility: The employer did not provide employees with a fit test prior to employee use of a half-facepiece respirator while spraying urethane conformal coating.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1120
- · Z (S) $1600
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 334412)
More inspections in CT
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 338944770.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.