Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,191,288Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-24 Last loaded 2026-07-29

OSHA Inspection: BACON UNIVERSAL COMPANY, INC.

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of BACON UNIVERSAL COMPANY, INC. in 918 AHUA STREET, HONOLULU, HI 96819 (NAICS 532412). OSHA activity number 338945520.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Bacon Universal Company, INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Bacon Universal Company, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
918 AHUA STREET
City
HONOLULU
State
HI
ZIP
96819
Mailing
918 AHUA STREET, HONOLULU, HI 96819
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
532412
Employees
45
Ownership type
A

6 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.134 C02 II

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Mar 15, 2013
Abate by
Apr 3, 2013
Penalty
Initial $2,380 · Current $1,785 Reduced

Hazardous substances R103

29 CFR 1910.134(c)(2)(ii): The employer did not establish and implement those elements of a written program necessary to ensure that any employee using a respirator voluntarily was medically able to use that respirator, and that the respirator was cleaned, stored, and maintained so that its use does not present a health hazard to the user:    On or about March 8, 2013, the employer did not establish the elements of a written program necessary to ensure that  employees using an elastomeric half-face respirator voluntarily were medically able to use that respirator, and that the respirators were cleaned, stored, and maintained so that its use did not present a health hazard to the user for the following employees:    a) Rental Technician utilizing an elastomeric half-face respirator when cleaning coral dust from equipment.    b) Service & Rental Technician utilizing an elastomeric half-face respirator when cleaning coral dust from equipment.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1785
  • — Z (S) $2380

1910.134 D01 III

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Mar 15, 2013
Abate by
Apr 3, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0

Hazardous substances R103

29 CFR 1910.134(d)(1)(iii): The employer did not identify and evaluate the respiratory hazard(s) in the workplace; including a reasonable estimate of employee exposures to respiratory hazards and identification of the contaminant's chemical state and physical form:    On or about March 8, 2013, the employer did not evaluate employee exposure to coral dust during air hammering and removing coral from excavator tracks.     a) Rental Technician when cleaning coral dust from equipment.    b) Service & Rental Technician when cleaning coral dust from equipment.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 E01

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Mar 15, 2013
Abate by
Apr 3, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0

Hazardous substances R103

29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace:    On or about March 8, 2013, the employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use an elastomeric respirator, before the employee was fit tested and used the respirator.    a) Rental Technician utilizing an elastomeric half-face respirator when cleaning coral dust from equipment.    b) Service & Rental Technician utilizing an elastomeric half-face respirator when cleaning coral dust from equipment.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.157 C01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 44 exposed
Issued
Mar 15, 2013
Abate by
Apr 3, 2013
Penalty
Initial $1,785 · Current $1,339 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.157(c)(1): Portable fire extinguishers were not mounted, located and identified so that they were readily accessible without subjecting the employees to injuries:    On or about March 8, 2013, portable fire extinguishers in the Service Area that were provided for employee use were not located so they were readily accessible.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1338.75
  • — Z (S) $1785

1910.178 F02

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 25 exposed
Issued
Mar 15, 2013
Abate by
Apr 3, 2013
Penalty
Initial $2,975 · Current $2,231 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.178(f)(2): The storage and handling of liquefied petroleum gas fuel was not in accordance with NFPA Storage and Handling of Liquefied Petroleum Gases (NFPA No. 58-1969), which is incorporated by reference as specified in 29 CFR 1910.6:    On or about March 8, 2013, LP-gas cylinders stored outside the Rental Shed were not located so as to minimize exposure to physical damage, in that they were not protected from contact from the movement of powered industrial vehicle and other construction equipment traffic in the area.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2231.25
  • — Z (S) $2975

1910.132 D02

Other-than-serious 1 instance 25 exposed
Issued
Mar 15, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.132(d)(2): The employer did not verify that the required workplace hazard assessment has been performed through a written certification which included the requirements as outlined in 29 CFR 1910.132(d)(2):    On or about March 8, 2013, the employer did not complete a workplace hazard assessment that contained a written certification and included the identity of the workplace evaluated, the person certifying the evaluation and the date of the hazard assessment, for employees working in the Parts, Service and Rental areas.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

View Bacon Universal Company, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 338945520.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.