Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: RONALD RICHTER

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of RONALD RICHTER in 251 WHITE ST., DANBURY, CT 06810 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 338946866.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Ronald Richter — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Ronald Richter is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
RONALD RICHTER
Site address
251 WHITE ST.
City
DANBURY
State
CT
ZIP
06810
Mailing
706 REDDING RD., WEST REDDING, CT 06896
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238160
Employees
5
Ownership type
A

2 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.20 B02

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Mar 15, 2013
Abate by
Apr 10, 2013
Penalty
Initial $2,000 · Current $1,000 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.20(b)(2): The employer did not initiate and maintain programs which provided for frequent and regular inspections of the job site, materials and equipment to be made by a competent person(s).    Worksite: A competent person did not conduct frequent and regular inspections of the jobsite, materials and equipment as required.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1000
  • — Z (S) $2000

1926.501 B10

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Mar 15, 2013
Abate by
Mar 27, 2013
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $1,500 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(10): Each employee engaged in roofing activities on low-slope roofs with unprotected sides and edges 6 feet or more above lower levels, was not protected from falling by guardrail systems, safety net systems, personal fall arrest systems, or a combination of warning line system and guardrail system, warning line system and safety net system, or warning line system and personal fall arrest system, or warning line system and safety monitoring system.  Or, on roofs 50-feet (15.25 m) or less in width, each employee was not protected by use of a monitoring system.    Worksite: The employees who were working on the 3 in 12 pitch roof with an eave height of approximately 17 feet above the ground were not protected from fall hazards by the use of guardrails, safety nets, a personal fall arrest system or a monitoring system.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1500
  • — Z (S) $2800

View Ronald Richter's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 338946866.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.