Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: JOSE ACOSTA

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of JOSE ACOSTA in 10913 HAMPTON LAKES, MAIZE, KS 67101 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 338953748.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Jose Acosta — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Jose Acosta is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
JOSE ACOSTA
Site address
10913 HAMPTON LAKES
City
MAIZE
State
KS
ZIP
67101
Mailing
1812 S. GLENN AVE, MAIZE, KS 67101
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238160
Employees
4
Ownership type
A

5 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.20 B01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Apr 4, 2013
Abate by
Apr 30, 2013
Penalty
Initial $1,200 · Current $1,200
29 CFR 1926.20(b)(1): The employer did not initiate and maintain accident prevention programs as necessary to comply with this part:    At 10913 Hampton Lakes, Maize, KS, the employer failed to develop an accident prevention program to address hazards associated with residential roofing, exposing employees to falls of approximately 10 feet from the eave to the ground below.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $1200
  • — C (S) $1200
  • — Z (S) $1200

1926.50 B

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Apr 4, 2013
Abate by
Apr 30, 2013
Penalty
Initial $1,200 · Current $1,200
29 CFR 1926.50(b): Provisions were not made prior to commencement of the project for prompt medical attention in case of serious injury:      At 10913 Hampton Lakes, Maize, KS, the employer failed to identify emergency services for employees and instruct employees on steps to be taken during an injury accident, resulting in prolonged suffering of an injured employee.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $1200
  • — C (S) $1200
  • — Z (S) $1200

1926.501 B13

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Apr 4, 2013
Abate by
Apr 30, 2013
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $2,800
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b):     At 10913 Hampton Lakes, Maize, KS, on or about March 2, 2013, the employer failed to provide fall protection to an employee sweeping snow from a 6 in 12 sloped roof, resulting in an approximate fall of 10 feet to the ground below.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $2800
  • — C (S) $2800
  • — Z (S) $2800

1926.502 A02

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Apr 4, 2013
Abate by
Apr 30, 2013
Penalty
Initial $2,000 · Current $2,000
29 CFR 1926.502(a)(2): The employer did not provide and install all fall protection systems required by this subpart for employee(s) and did not comply with all other pertinent requirements of this subpart before employee(s) began the work that necessitates the fall protection.    At 10913 Hampton Lakes, Maize, KS, on or about March 2, 2013, the employer failed to provide or install fall protection systems to protect his employees from a fall from a 6 in 12 sloped roof, exposing employees to a fall of approximately 10 feet to the ground below.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $2000
  • — C (S) $2000
  • — Z (S) $2000

1926.503 A01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Apr 4, 2013
Abate by
Apr 30, 2013
Penalty
Initial $1,200 · Current $1,200
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee potentially exposed to fall hazards to enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards:    At 10913 Hampton Lakes, Maize, KS, the employer failed to provide fall protection training to employees, exposing employees to an approximate 10 feet fall from a 6 in 12 sloped roof.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $1200
  • — C (S) $1200
  • — Z (S) $1200

View Jose Acosta's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 338953748.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.