BERLIN, NH —
OSHA Inspection: MASCARO CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, LP
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of MASCARO CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, LP in COMMUNITY STREET, BERLIN, NH 03570 (NAICS 236210). OSHA activity number 338953862.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- MASCARO CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, LP
- Site address
- COMMUNITY STREET
- City
- BERLIN
- State
- NH
- ZIP
- 03570
- Mailing
- 1720 METROPOLITIAN STREET, PITTSBURGH, PA 15233
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Complete (A)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- A
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 236210
- Employees
- 8000
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
5 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.651 J01
- Issued
- Sep 10, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $4,000 · Current $2,000 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.651(j)(1): Adequate protection was not provided to protect employees from loose rock or soil that could pose a hazard by falling or rolling from an excavation face: a. North of Boiler Building - Employees were not protected from struck by hazards while laying pipe in an excavation where there were near vertical walls and loose bricks and rocks mixed in with the walls of that excavation.
Recent events (3)
- — F (O) $2000
- — C (S) $4000
- — Z (S) $4000
1926.652 A01
- Issued
- Sep 10, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $7,000 · Current $7,000
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.652(a)(1): Each employee in an excavation was not protected from cave-ins by an adequate protective system designed in accordance with 29 CFR 1926.652(c). The employer had not complied with the provisions of 29 CFR 1926.652(b)(1)(i) in that: a. Scale House - On or about 03/12/13, Employees were not protected from cave-in hazards while setting concrete forms in a 6 foot deep open sided excavation that was not adequately sloped and did not contain an alternative protective system.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $7000
- — C (S) $7000
- — Z (S) $7000
1926.652 A01
- Issued
- Sep 10, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $70,000 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.652(a)(1): Each employee in an excavation was not protected from cave-ins by an adequate protective system designed in accordance with 29 CFR 1926.652(c). The employer had not complied with the provisions of 29 CFR 1926.652(b)(1)(i) in that: a. Site - On or about 03/12/13, Employees were not protected from cave-in hazards while laying pipe in a 12 foot deep excavation that was not adequately sloped and did not contain an alternative protective system. b. Site - On or about 03/25/13, Employees were not protected from cave-in hazards while setting a water pump inside a 12 foot deep excavation that was not properly sloped and did not contain an alternative protective system.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $0
- — C (W) $70000
- — Z (W) $70000
1926.1053 B04
- Issued
- Sep 10, 2013
- Abate by
- Sep 16, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $4,000 · Current $4,000
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(4): Ladders were used for purposes other than the purposes for which they were designed: a. North of Boiler Building - Employees were not protected from falls of 6 feet while using an 8' fiberglass portable step ladder in the closed position to enter and exit a trench box.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $4000
- — C (S) $4000
- — Z (S) $4000
1926.602 C01 II
- Issued
- Sep 10, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.602(c)(1)(ii): Modifications or additions affecting the safe operation of the equipment were made without the manufacturer's written approval: a. The employer affected the capacity of a JLG rough terrain forklift model #- 1255, by lifting steel concrete gang forms beneath the forks with a sling, without the manufacturers written approval.
Recent events (3)
- — F (O) $0
- — C (O) $0
- — Z (O) $0
More inspections at Mascaro Construction Company, LP
View Mascaro Construction Company, LP's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 236210)
More inspections in NH
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 338953862.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.