Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,197,549Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-27 Last loaded 2026-08-31

OSHA Inspection: ACTION MANUFACTURING COMPANY

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of ACTION MANUFACTURING COMPANY in 190 RITTENHOUSE CIRCLE, BRISTOL, PA 19007 (NAICS 332993). OSHA activity number 338956634.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Action Manufacturing Company for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Action Manufacturing Company is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
190 RITTENHOUSE CIRCLE
City
BRISTOL
State
PA
ZIP
19007
Mailing
190 RITTENHOUSE CIRCLE, BRISTOL, PA 19007
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
Non-union (B)
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
332993
Employees
115
Ownership type
Private (A)

5 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.147 C06 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jul 2, 2013
Abate by
Jul 18, 2013
Penalty
Initial $3,443 · Current $2,066 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(6)(i): The employer did not conduct a periodic inspection of the energy control procedure at least annually to ensure that the procedure and the requirement of this standard were being followed:    a) Action Manufacturing Company, Main Machine Area - On or about March 14, 2013, a periodic inspection of the energy control procedure had not been conducted since November, 1994.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $2065.8
  • · Z (S) $3443

1910.147 D

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jul 2, 2013
Abate by
Jul 18, 2013
Penalty
Initial $3,443 · Current $2,066 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.147(d): The established procedure for the application of energy control (the lockout or tagout procedures) did not cover the actions listed in and was not done in sequence as required by 29 CFR 1910.147(d)(1)-(6):    a) Action Manufacturing Company, Main Machine Area - On or about March 14, 2013, lock out tag out procedures were not performed in the required sequence in that the relief of stored energy step is listed prior to the locking and/or tagging out procedure.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $2065.8
  • · Z (S) $3443

1910.212 A01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jul 2, 2013
Penalty
Initial $2,341 · Current $1,405 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1): One or more methods of machine guarding was not provided to protect the operator and other employees in the machine area from hazards such as those created by point of operation, ingoing nip points, rotating parts, flying chips and sparks:    a) Action Manufacturing Company, Main Machine Area - on or about March 14, 2013, employees were exposed to an incompletely guarded vertical band saw blade on a Powermatic band saw.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1404.6
  • · Z (S) $2341

1910.147 C05 II B

Other-than-serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jul 2, 2013
Abate by
Jul 18, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(5)(ii)(B): Lockout and tagout devices were not standardized within the facility in at least one of the following criteria: color; shape; or size.  a) Action Manufacturing Company, Main Machine Area - On or about March 14, 2013, employees were using padlocks of different manufacture and color as locking devices. The employer also had two designs of tags that were of different colors.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $0
  • · Z (O) $0

1910.147 C07 IV

Other-than-serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jul 2, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(7)(iv): The employer did not certify that employee training had been accomplished and kept up to date:  a) Action Manufacturing Company, Main Machine Area - On or about March 14, 2013, the employer did not certify that training had been accomplished for two maintenance employees.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $0
  • · Z (O) $0

View Action Manufacturing Company's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 338956634.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.