Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: TRI COUNTY BUILDERS

Planned inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned health inspection of TRI COUNTY BUILDERS in 993 WEST MAIN STREET, SUGARCREEK, OH 44681 (NAICS 236118). OSHA activity number 338957285.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch TRI County Builders — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for TRI County Builders is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
TRI COUNTY BUILDERS
Site address
993 WEST MAIN STREET
City
SUGARCREEK
State
OH
ZIP
44681
Mailing
4011 TR 369, MILLERSBURG, OH 44654
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
236118
Employees
5
Ownership type
A

1 citation on file for this inspection.

1926.501 B13

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Mar 29, 2013
Abate by
Apr 18, 2013
Penalty
Initial $2,000 · Current $1,400 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): "Residential construction." Each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels shall be protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system unless another provision in paragraph (b) of this section provides for an alternative fall protection measure. Exception: When the employer can demonstrate that it is infeasible or creates a greater hazard to use these systems, the employer shall develop and implement a fall protection plan which meets the requirements of paragraph (k) of 1926.502.  Note: There is a presumption that it is feasible and will not create a greater hazard to implement at least one of the above-listed fall protection systems. Accordingly, the employer has the burden of establishing that it is appropriate to implement a fall protection plan which complies with 1926.502(k) for a particular workplace situation, in lieu of implementing any of those systems.    March 13, 2013, Tri County Builders, 993 W. Main Street, Sugarcreek, Ohio jobsite:     a. Employees working up to 20 feet above lower levels (ground) were not provided fall protection for roof activities such as installing roofing materials and performing associated duties, such as taking measurements. Additionally the employer had not established a compliant 1926.502(k) fall protection plan.    b. Employees were not provided fall protection associated with 11 window openings in the exterior wall located on the second story (the top floor used to access the roof work area).
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1400
  • — Z (S) $2000

View TRI County Builders's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 338957285.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.