Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: CONSPEC CONSTRUCTION, L.L.C.

Unprogrammed Related inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened an unprogrammed Related safety inspection of CONSPEC CONSTRUCTION, L.L.C. in 14711-14713 ST HIGHWAY 37, WHITTINGTON, IL 62897 (NAICS 236220). OSHA activity number 338957624.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Conspec Construction, L.L.C. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Conspec Construction, L.L.C. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
14711-14713 ST HIGHWAY 37
City
WHITTINGTON
State
IL
ZIP
62897
Mailing
704 N. HICKORY ST., BENTON, IL 62812
Inspection type
Unprogrammed Related (G)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
236220
Employees
4
Ownership type
A

4 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.20 B01

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 1 exposed
Issued
May 7, 2013
Abate by
Jun 3, 2013
Penalty
Initial $1,600 · Current $1,600
29 CFR 1926.20(b)(1): The employer did not initiate and maintain such programs as may be necessary to comply with this part:        a)    South side of the motel construction project, two employees working in an elevated JLG 80HX aerial lift, were exposed to fall hazards of 11 feet and the employer did not initiate and maintain an accident prevention program to control and eliminate the hazards present at the jobsite in accordance with OSHA regulations.
Recent events (3)
  • — A (S) $1600
  • — I (S) $1120
  • — Z (S) $1600

1926.20 B02

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
May 7, 2013
Abate by
Jun 3, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.20(b)(2): The employer did not initiate and maintain programs which provided for frequent and regular inspections of the job site, materials and equipment to be made by a competent person(s):        a)    South side of the motel construction project, two employees working in an elevated JLG 80HX aerial lift, were exposed to fall hazards of 11 feet due to not wearing their safety harnesses as part of a Personal Fall Arrest System.  The employer did not initiate and maintain programs which provided for frequent and regular inspections of the job site, materials and equipment to be made by a competent person to ensure employees were not performing unsafe operations at the jobsite.
Recent events (3)
  • — A (S) $0
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.100 A

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
May 7, 2013
Abate by
May 13, 2013
Penalty
Initial $1,600 · Current $1,600
29 CFR 1926.100(a):       Employees working in areas where there was a possible danger of head injury from impact, or falling or flying objects, or from electrical shock and burns, were not protected by protective helmets:       a)    At the worksite on the north side of motel construction site, three employees were exposed to head injuries and were not wearing protective helmets while working below other employees that were using metal tools and roofing materials.  Two employees were in an aerial lift and other one was on the ground level
Recent events (3)
  • — A (S) $1600
  • — I (S) $1120
  • — Z (S) $1600

1926.453 B02 V

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
May 7, 2013
Abate by
May 13, 2013
Penalty
Initial $1,600 · Current $1,600
29 CFR 1926.453(b)(2)(v):       A body belt was not worn and/or a lanyard was not attached to the boom or basket when working from an aerial lift: Note:  As of January 1, 1998, subpart M of this part (1926.502(d)) provides that body belts are not acceptable as part of a personal fall arrest system.  The use of a body belt in a tethering system or in a restraint system is acceptable and is regulated:           a)    South side of the motel construction project,  two employees working in an elevated JLG 80HX aerial lift, where exposed to fall hazards of 11 feet due to not wearing their safety harnesses as part of a Personal Fall Arrest System.
Recent events (3)
  • — A (S) $1600
  • — I (S) $1120
  • — Z (S) $1600

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 338957624.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.